FAQ
T_LOGIN Log in

Don't have an account on our website?

T_REGISTER Register

Studies in Polish Linguistics

Description

The journal offers articles devoted to a variety of topics such as phonology, morphology, morphonology, syntax, morphosyntax, semantics, pragmatics, information structure, linguistic stylistics, phraseology, discourse analysis, lexicology and lexicography, language contact, language typology, generative linguistics, cognitive linguistics, quantitative linguistics, historical linguistics, sociolinguistics, corpus linguistics, and translation studies.

ISSN: 1732-8160

eISSN: 2300-5920

MNiSW points: 70

UIC ID: 26621

Abbreviations: Stud. Pol. Linguist.

DOI: 10.4467/23005920SPL

Editorial team

Editor-in-Chief :
Magdalena Szczyrbak
Assistant to the Editor-in-Chief:
Agata Pawlina

Affiliation

Jagiellonian University in Kraków

Journal content

see all issues Next

Vol. 21, Issue 1

Publication date: 30.04.2026

Editor-in-Chief : Magdalena Szczyrbak

Assistant to the Editor-in-Chief: Agata Pawlina

Issue content

Daniel Karczewski

Studies in Polish Linguistics, Vol. 21, Issue 1, Volume 21 (2026), pp. 1-17

https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920SPL.26.001.23410
This study examines how native speakers of Polish paraphrase two types of quantified statements: (i) minority statements (e.g., Wszystkie kangury mają torby ‘All kangaroos have pouches’), that is, false universal generalizations about properties possessed by only a subset of a category, and (ii) statements involving pragmatically implied quantifier domain restriction (e.g., Wszyscy przynieśli prezenty dla Hani ‘Everyone brought presents for Hania’), where the quantifier is understood to apply to a limited set. The aim is to contribute to the ongoing discussion on overgeneralization bias, that is, the tendency of adults to endorse false universal statements. Two competing accounts have been proposed for this phenomenon: the generic overgeneralization effect hypothesis (Leslie et al., 2011) and the quantifier domain restriction hypothesis (Lazaridou-Chatzigoga et al., 2017, 2019). The analysis of paraphrases showed that participants rarely referred to a restricted subset of the category. Instead, they either retained a strong universal quantifier or omitted the quantifier in their paraphrases. These findings lend support to the generic overgeneralization effect hypothesis over the domain restriction account.
Read more Next

Natalia Zawadzka-Paluektau, Witold Kieraś

Studies in Polish Linguistics, Vol. 21, Issue 1, Volume 21 (2026), pp. 19-46

https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920SPL.26.002.23411
Despite extensive research, populism remains one of the most strongly contested concepts relating to political language. This study aims to contribute to its understanding by putting forward an approach to identifying markers of populist communication, which draws on the Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies toolkit. In order to test the “populist Zeitgeist” hypothesis (Mudde, 2007), and to fill the gap in research on populism in Eastern Europe, this methodology is then applied to a corpus of Polish mainstream politicians’ election campaign speeches. The results point to the populist contagion, provide counter-evidence to the claims of a transitory nature of populism and show significant variation, despite the relatively subtle ideological differences between the analysed parties. This suggests that populism should not be considered merely as an attachment to a “host” (usually extreme) ideology, but rather as a complex discursive phenomenon in its own right.
Read more Next