Binding and Phasehood in South Slavic Revisited
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEBinding and Phasehood in South Slavic Revisited
Publication date: 05.2019
Studies in Polish Linguistics, Volume 14 (2019), Vol. 14, Issue 2, pp. 61 - 80
https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920SPL.19.014.11079Authors
Binding and Phasehood in South Slavic Revisited
In a series of works and using a variety of diagnostics, Bošković argues that languages can be divided into those in which nominals project to DP and those in which they do not. Since Bulgarian (and Macedonian) express definiteness morphologically, they would appear to differ from Bosnian/Croatian/Montenegrin/Serbian (and Slovenian) in countenancing DP, but recent work argues that evidence for Bg as a DP-language is not so clear cut. In an attempt to set the record straight about the South Slavic data she describes, this paper addresses the criticisms specifically raised by LaTerza (2016), who explores Despić’s (2009, 2011, 2013) observations about binding and phasehood in BCMS. In revisiting her claims it will be shown that the relevant differences between the South Slavic languages do in fact lend support to the “parameterized DP” account of the different binding possibilities.
Bošković Željko (2003). On left branch extraction. In Investigations into Formal Slavic Linguistics: Contributions of the Fourth European Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages—FDSL 4, Peter Kosta, Joanna Błaszczak, Jens Frasek, Ljudmila Geist, Marzena Żygis (eds.), 543–577. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Bošković Željko (2005). On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica 59: 1–45.
Bošković Željko (2006). Case checking vs. case assignment and the case of adverbial NPs. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 522–533.
Bošković Željko (2008). What will you have, DP or NP? In NELS 37, Emily Elfner, Martin Walkow (eds.), 101–114. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.
Bošković Željko (2009a). More on the no-DP analysis of article-less languages. Studia Linguistica 63:187–203.
Bošković Željko (2009b). The NP/DP analysis and Slovenian. Proceeding of the University of Novi Sad Workshop on Generative Syntax 1, 53–73.
Bošković Željko (2012). On NPs and Clauses. In Discourse and Grammar: From Sentence Types to Lexical Categories, Günther Grewendorf, Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds.), 179–242. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bošković Željko (2013). Phases beyond clauses. In The Nominal Structure in Slavic and Beyond, Lilia Schürcks, Anastasia Giannakidou, Urtzi Etxebarria (eds.), 75–128. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bošković Željko (2014). Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 45(1): 27–89.
Bošković Željko (2016). Getting really edgy: On the edge of the edge. Linguistic Inquiry 47(1): 1–33.
Bošković Željko, Şener Serkan (2014). The Turkish NP. In Syntax and Semantics 39: Crosslinguistic Studies on Noun Phrase Structure and Reference, Patricia Hofherr, Anne Zribi-Hertz (eds.), 102–140. Leiden: Brill.
Despić Miloje (2009). On the structure of Serbo-Croatian NP: Evidence from binding. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Yale Meeting 2008, Jodi Reich, Maria Babyonyshev, Darya Kavitskaya (eds.), 17–32. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Despić Miloje (2011). Syntax in the Absence of Determiner Phrase. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, Ph.D. dissertation.
Despić Miloje (2013). Binding and the structure of NP in Serbo-Croatian. Linguistic Inquiry 44(2): 239–270.
Elson Mark (1976). The definite article in Bulgarian and Macedonian. The Slavic and East European Journal 20(3): 273–279.
Embick David, Noyer Rolf (2001). Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32(4): 555–595.
Franks Steven (1994). Parametric properties of numeral phrases in Slavic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12(4): 570–649.
Franks Steven (2001). The Internal Structure of Slavic NPs, with Special Reference to Bulgarian. In Generative Linguistics in Poland: Syntax and Morphosyntax, Adam Przepiórkowski, Piotr Bański (eds.), 53–69. Warszawa: Instytut Podstaw Informatyki PAN.
Franks Steven (2009). Macedonian pronominal clitics as object agreement markers. In A Linguist’s Linguist: Studies in South Slavic Linguistics in Honor of E. Wayles Browne, Steven Franks, Vrinda Chidambaram, Brian Joseph (eds.), 189–221. Bloomington, IN: Slavica.
Franks Steven (2014). The Slovenian orphan accusative, empty pronouns and noun phrase structure. In The Nominal Structure in Slavic and Beyond, Lilia Schürcks, Anastasia Giannakidou, Urtzi Etxebarria (eds.), 129–182. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Franks Steven (2018). A Bulgarian solution to the Slavic Q question? In Katerino Mome: Studies in Bulgarian Morphosyntax in Honor of Catherine Rudin, Steven Franks, Vrinda Chidambaram, Brian Joseph, Iliyana Krapova (eds.), 93–120. Bloomington, IN: Slavica.
Franks Steven, King Tracy Holloway (2000). A Handbook of Slavic Clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Friedman Victor (2001). Macedonian. The Slavic and East European Language Re- search Center, Duke University.
Gyllin Roger (1982). Morfologična klasifikacija na opredelitelnija člen v bâlgarskija ezik. Sâpostavitelno ezikoznanie 7(3): 16–22.
Halpern Aaron (1995). On the Morphology and Placement of Clitics. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Koev Todor (2011). Definiteness as agreement: Evidence from Bulgarian. In Proceed- ings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Mary Byram Wash- burn, Katherine McKinney-Bock, Erika Varis, Ann Sawyer, Barbara Tomaszewicz (eds.), 133–141. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Kornfilt Jaklin (2018). NP versus DP: Which one fits Turkish nominal phrases bet- ter? Turkic Languages 22(2): 155–166.
LaTerza Ivana (2016). Binding in English and South Slavic and the parameterized DP hypothesis. Linguistic Inquiry 47(4): 741–753.
Lyutikova Ekaterina, Pereltsvaig Asya (2015). The Tatar DP. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 60(3): 289–325.
Migdalski Krzysztof (2018). On two sources of second position effects (part 2). Studies in Polish Linguistics 13(4): 187–208.
Montalbetti Mario (1984). After Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT, Ph.D. dissertation.
Pancheva Roumyana (2018). How many flowers! So many colors! Number marking in cardinality exclamatives in Bulgarian. In Katerino Mome: Studies in Bulgarian Morphosyntax in Honor of Catherine Rudin, Steven Franks, Vrinda Chidambaram, Brian Joseph, Iliyana Krapova (eds.), 197–233. Bloomington, IN: Slavica.
Schürcks Lilia (2006). Binding and point of view in Bulgarian. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 51(4): 386–405.
Srdanović Sanja (2019). The referential properties of Serbian possessive constructions: Clitics vs. strong pronouns. Talk presented at Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 28, Stony Brook, NY.
Stateva Penka, Stepanov Arthur (2016). Agreement errors and structural distance: A corpus study of Bulgarian. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 61(3): 1–15.
Szczegielniak Adam (2017). Dynamic phase heads. The case of the invisible DP in Slavic. In A Pesky Set: Papers for David Pesetsky. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 80, Claire Halpert, Hadas Kotek, and Coppe van Urk (eds.), 301–311. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Tasseva-Kurktchieva Mila, Dubinsky Stanley (2018). On the NP/DP Frontier: Bulgarian as a transitional case. In Katerino Mome: Studies in Bulgarian Morphosyntax in Honor of Catherine Rudin, Steven Franks, Vrinda Chidambaram, Brian Joseph, Iliyana Krapova (eds.), 287–312. Bloomington, IN: Slavica.
Tomić Olga Mišeska (2012). A Grammar of Macedonian. Bloomington, IN: Slavica
Zanon Ksenia (2015). On Hybrid Coordination and Quantifier Raising in Russian. Indiana University, Ph.D. dissertation.
Information: Studies in Polish Linguistics, Volume 14 (2019), Vol. 14, Issue 2, pp. 61 - 80
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Binding and Phasehood in South Slavic Revisited
Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana USA
Published at: 05.2019
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
English