The Balkan Dative revisited
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEThe Balkan Dative revisited
Publication date: 15.10.2011
Studies in Polish Linguistics, Volume 6 (2011), Vol. 6, Issue 1, pp. 139 - 151
Authors
The Balkan Dative revisited
The authors are interested in the semantic (= not formal) evolution of the dative case relationship. They carry their analysis in the framework of the anthropocentric case theory and argue that the referent of the dative NP (NPD) is the second (in the communicative hierarchy) human protagonist of the event (beneficiens and/or experiencer). Also the D ~ G opposition is analyzed on the semantic plane, with the referent of the NPG interpreted as the possessor in contexts when the possessor – possessum relation is realized at the level of a NP, and not at the sentential level. The syntactic, adverbal vs. adnominal position is understood as the basic, definitional difference between NPD and NPG at the formal plane.
Atanasov Petar (1990): Le mégléno-roumain de nos jours. (= Balkan Archiv 7). — Hamburg: H. Buske.
Gogolewski Stanisław (1982): Kategoria przypadka w słowiańskich i romańskich językach ligi bałkańskiej. — Łódź: Acta Universitatis Lodziensis.
Gołąb Zbigniew (1984): The Arumanian Dialect of Kruševo in SR Macedonia SFR Yugoslavia. — Skopje: MANU.
Horrocks Geoffrey C. (1997): Greek: A history of the language and its speakers. — London–New York: Longmans.
Mindak Jolanta, Sawicka Irena (1993): Zarys gramatyki języka albańskiego. — Warszawa: Slawistyczny Ośrodek Wydawniczy.
Moszyński Leszek (2006): Wstęp do fi lologii słowiańskiej. — Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Newmark Leonard, Hubbard Philip, Prifti Peter (1982): Standard Albanian, A Reference Grammar for Students. — Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Renzi Lorenzo (con la collaborazione di Giampaolo Salvi) (1987): Nuova introduzione alla filologia romanza. — Bologna: Mulino.
Topolińska Zuzanna (1996): Anthropocentric Language Theory as Organizing Principle of the Slavic Case System. — Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego 52, 57–72.
Tsigou Maria (1996): The Evolution of the Dative in Greek. — Cahiers de l‘Institut de linguistique de Louvain 22 (3–4/1–2), 211–215.
ИЛИЕВСКИ Петар Хр. (1988): Учеството на грчкиот и балканскиот латински во развојот на старословемнската деклинација. — [In:] Балканолошки лингвистички студии со посебен осврт кон историскиот развој на македонскиот јазик; Скопје: ИМЈ, 99–113.
МАРКОВИЌ Марјан (2007): Ароманскиот и македонскиот говор од охридско-струшкиот регион во балкански контекст. — Скопје: МАНУ.
МИТКОВСКА Лилјана (2005): Изразување на посесивност на ниво на именската синтагма во македонскиот и во англискиот јазик. — Докторска дисератција, Скопје: УКИМ.
ТОПОЛИЊСКА Зузана (1988): Дативниот однос и кирилометодиевското јазично наследство. — [In:] Кирило-методиевскиот (старословенскиот период и кирилометодиевската традиција во Македонија; Скопје: МАНУ, 53–59.
ТОПОЛИЊСКА Зузана (2008): Развитокот на граматичките категории. (= Македонски – Пол-ски. Граматичка конфронтација 7). — Скопје: МАНУ.
Barðdal Jóhanna, Kulikov Leonid: Case in Decline, http://ling.uib.no/IECASTP/CaseInDecline.pdf.
Blake Barry: Features of Case, http://www.latrobe.edu.au/linguistics/LaTrobePapersinLinguistics/Vol%2005/02Blake.pdf.
Information: Studies in Polish Linguistics, Volume 6 (2011), Vol. 6, Issue 1, pp. 139 - 151
Article type: Original article
Titles:
The Balkan Dative revisited
O datiwie w językach Bałkanów raz jeszcze
Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, MacedoniaSs. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje
Published at: 15.10.2011
Article status: Open
Licence: None
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
EnglishView count: 2089
Number of downloads: 1122