Strict and Sloppy Readings of Pronominal Objects in Polish

Marta Ruda

Strict and Sloppy Readings of Pronominal Objects in Polish

Publication date: 06.2021

Studies in Polish Linguistics, Volume 16 (2021), Vol. 16, Issue 2, pp. 121 - 144

https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920SPL.21.006.13960

Authors

Pobierz pełny tekst

PDF

Titles

Strict and Sloppy Readings of Pronominal Objects in Polish

Abstract

Pronominal clitics in South Slavic languages have been shown to manifest the strict/sloppy reading ambiguity effect. In this paper I examine Polish object pronouns from this perspective, observing that even though they are not clitics, they can still be compatible with the sloppy interpretation if the right type of context is provided. The data speak against an ellipsis-based approach, aligning with the view that the sloppy reading is not a viable test for ellipsis. I thus pursue an alternative analysis on which the strict and sloppy readings are associated with a structural difference in the composition of the pronoun (PersP vs. NumP respectively), offering along the way additional evidence pointing to the importance of pragmatic distinctions in investigations of the interpretive properties of different types of nominal elements. From a more general point of view, the discussion suggests that the empirical picture related to the sloppy interpretation is highly complex, making an investigation of a broader spectrum of languages and contexts indispensable for disentangling all the relevant factors and developing an optimal theoretical approach.

W literaturze dotyczącej języków południowosłowiańskich pokazano, że klityki zaimkowe w tych językach przejawiają dwuznaczność pod względem dokładnej i niedokładnej interpretacji. W artykule poddaję badaniu z tej perspektywy polskie zaimki w funkcji dopełnienia, pokazując, że ‒ pomimo iż nie są klitykami ‒ mogą też mieć interpretację niedokładną, jeżeli są osadzone w odpowiednim kontekście. Dane przemawiają przeciwko podejściu wykorzystującemu mechanizm elipsy, w zgodzie z poglądem, że interpretacja niedokładna nie jest wiarygodnym testem dla struktur eliptycznych. Proponuję zatem alternatywną analizę, według której interpretacje dokładna i niedokładna wynikają z różnicy strukturalnej zaimka (odpowiednio PersP vs. NumP), dostarczając przy tym dodatkowych danych wskazujących na wagę rozróżnień pragmatycznych dla badań nad własnościami interpretacyjnymi różnych typów jednostek nominalnych. Z bardziej ogólnego punktu widzenia dyskusja sugeruje, że dane empiryczne związane z zagadnieniem interpretacji niedokładnej są niezwykle skomplikowane, przez co konieczne jest zbadanie szerszego spektrum języków i kontekstów w celu rozwikłania wszystkich istotnych zmiennych oraz zaproponowania optymalnego podejścia teoretycznego.

Keywords

strict and sloppy reading, pronouns, clitics, argument drop

dokładna i niedokładna interpretacja, zaimki, klityki, opuszczanie argumentu

References

Download references

Bailyn John Frederick (2017). Against a VP ellipsis account of Russian verb-stranding constructions. In Studies in Japanese and Korean Linguistics and beyond, Alexander Vovin (ed.), 93–109. Leiden: Brill.

BoškovićŽeljko (2018). On pronouns, clitic doubling, and argument ellipsis: Argument ellipsis as predicate ellipsis. English Linguistics 35, 1–37.

Cardinaletti Anna, Starke Michal (1999). The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In Eurotyp. Volume 5/Part 1: Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), 145–234. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.

Cetnarowska Bożena (2003). On pronominal clusters in Polish. In Investigations into Formal Slavic Linguistics: Contributions of the Fourth European Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages — FDSL IV held at Potsdam University, November 28–30, 2001, Peter Kosta, Joanna Błaszczak, Jens Frasek, Ljudmila Geist, Marzena Żygis (eds.), 13–30. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Cetnarowska Bożena (2004). The scale of pronominal strength in Polish: An OT analysis of unstressed and weak pronouns. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 39, 39–57.

Cheng Hsu-Te Johnny (2013). Argument ellipsis, classifier phrases, and the DP parameter. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, Ph.D. dissertation.

Chierchia Gennaro (1998). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6, 339–405.

Cyrino Sonia, Lopes Ruth (2016). Null objects are ellipsis in Brazilian Portuguese. The Linguistic Review 33, 483–502.

Duguine Maia (2014). Argument ellipsis: A unitary approach to pro-drop. The Linguistic Review 31, 515–549.

Elbourne Paul (2005). Situations and Individuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Elbourne Paul (2013). Definite Descriptions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Franks Steven (2013). Orphans, doubling, coordination, and phases: On nominal structure in Slovenian. Slovenski jezik — Slovene Linguistic Studies 9, 55–92.

Franks Steven (2016). Clitics are/become Minimal(ist). In Formal Studies in Slovenian Syntax: In Honor of Janez Orešnik, Franc Lanko Marušič, Rok Žaucer (eds.), 91–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Gribanova Vera (2013a). Verb-stranding Verb Phrase ellipsis and the structure of the Russian verbal complex. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31, 91–136.

Gribanova Vera (2013b). A new argument for verb-stranding Verb Phrase ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 44, 145–157.

Heim Irene (1991). Artikel und definitheit [Articles and definiteness]. In Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung, Arnim von Stechow, Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), 487–535. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Hoji Hajime (1998). Null object and sloppy identity in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry 29, 127–152.

Huang C.-T. James (1987). Remarks on empty categories in Chinese. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 321–337.

Huang C.-T. James (1991). Remarks on the status of null objects. In Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, Robert Freidin (ed.), 56–76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jung Hakyung, Migdalski Krzysztof (2015). On the degrammaticalization of pronominal clitics in Slavic. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The First Berkeley Meeting 2014 (Michigan Slavic Materials, 61), Małgorzata Szajbel-Keck, Roslyn Burns, Darya Kavitskaya (eds.), 143–162. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.

Kasai Hironobu (2014). On the nature of null clausal complements in Japanese. Syntax 17, 168–188.

Kim Soowon (1999). Sloppy/strict identity, empty objects, and NP ellipsis. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8, 255–284.

Kurafuji Takeo (2018). A choice function approach to null arguments. Linguistics and Philosophy 42, 3–44.

Landau Idan (2018). Missing objects in Hebrew: Argument ellipsis, not VP ellipsis. Glossa 3, 1–37.

Landau Idan (2020). On the nonexistence of verb-stranding VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 51, 341–365.

Lowenstamm Jean (2008). On little n, √, and types of nouns. In Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology, Jutta Hartmann, Veronika Hegedűs, Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), 105–144. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

McShane Marjorie J. (1999). The ellipsis of accusative direct objects in Russian, Polish and Czech. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 7, 45–88.

Merchant Jason (2013). Diagnosing ellipsis. In Diagnosing Syntax, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng, Norbert Corver (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Merchant Jason (2018). Verb-stranding predicate ellipsis in Greek, implicit arguments, and ellipsis-internal focus. In A Reasonable Way to Proceed: Essays in Honor of Jim McCloskey, Jason Merchant, Line Mikkelsen, Deniz Rudin, and Kelsey Sasaki (eds.), 229–269. University of California eScholarship.

Migdalski Krzysztof (2016). Second Position Effects in the Syntax of Germanic and Slavic Languages. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.

Oku Satoshi (1998). A theory of selection and reconstruction in the Minimalist perspective. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, Ph.D. dissertation.

Otani Kazuyo, Whitman John (1991). V-raising and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 345–358.

Perlmutter David, Orešnik Janez (1973). Language-particular rules and explanation in syntax. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson, Paul Kiparsky (eds.), 419–459. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Ruda Marta (2021). Polish personal pronouns: [PersP~Pers [NumP Num [n]]] and [NumP Num [n]]. Studies in Polish Linguistics 16(1), 23–40.

Ruda Marta (2017). On the Syntax of Missing Objects. A Study with Special Reference to English, Polish, and Hungarian. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

RunićJelena (2013). A new look at clitics: Evidence from Slavic. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Third Indiana Meeting 2012, Steven Franks, Markus Dickinson, George Fowler, Melissa Witcombe, Ksenia Zanon (eds.), 275–288.

Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications. Saito Mamoru (2007). Notes on East Asian argument ellipsis. Language Research 43, 203–227.

Sakamoto Yuta (2019). Overtly empty but covertly complex. Linguistic Inquiry 50, 105–136.

Sauerland Uli (2007). Flat binding: Binding without sequences. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language?, Uli Sauerland, Hans-Martin Gartner (eds.), 197–254. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Şener Serkan, Takahashi Daiko (2010). Ellipsis of arguments in Japanese and Turkish. Nanzan Linguistics 6, 79–99.

Takahashi Daiko (2008). Quantificational null objects and argument ellipsis objects and argument ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 39, 307–326.

Takahashi Daiko (2020). Derivational argument ellipsis. The Linguistic Review 37, 47–74.

Tancredi Christopher Damian (1992). Deletion, deaccenting and presupposition. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Ph.D. dissertation.

Tomioka Satoshi (2003). The semantics of Japanese null pronouns and its cross-linguistic implications. In The Interfaces: Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Structures, Kerstin Schwabe, Susanne Winkler (eds.), 321–339. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Tomioka Satoshi (2014a). Micro-parameters in discourse pro-drop languages: Comments on ‘Born empty’by Yen-hui Audrey Li. Lingua 151, 69–77.

Tomioka Satoshi (2014b). Remarks on missing arguments in Japanese. In Proceedings of FAJL 7: Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics, Shigeto Kawahara, Mika Igarashi (eds.), 251–263. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wechsler Stephen (2006). Why are the lazy so agreeable? In Between 40 and 60 Puzzles for Krifka, Hans-Martin Gartner, Sigrid Beck, Regine Eckardt, Renate Musan, Barbara Stiebels (eds.). Berlin: ZAS.

Willim Ewa (2012). On the feature valuation/interpretability biconditional in Minimalist Theory. The case of (un)interpretable gender. In Sound, Structure and Sense. Studies in Memory of Edmund Gussmann. Eugeniusz Cyran, Henryk Kardela, Bogdan Szymanek (eds.), 761–806. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.

WitkośJacek (1998). The Syntax of Clitics. Steps towards a Minimalist Account. Poznań: Motivex.

Information

Information: Studies in Polish Linguistics, Volume 16 (2021), Vol. 16, Issue 2, pp. 121 - 144

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920SPL.21.006.13960

Article type: Original article

Titles:

English:

Strict and Sloppy Readings of Pronominal Objects in Polish

Authors

Marta Ruda

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6330-0666

Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków, Poland

Published at: 06.2021

Article status: Open

Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Article financing:

* This research was supported by National Science Centre, Poland, grant 2018/31/D/HS2/00130.

Percentage share of authors:

Marta Ruda (Author) - 100%

Article corrections:

Publication languages:

English

View count: 848

Number of downloads: 607

<p>Strict and Sloppy Readings of Pronominal Objects in Polish</p>

Download xml