Bader Markus, Meng Michael (1999). Case attraction phenomena in German. Manuscript, University of Jena. (http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.112.2979&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed: 28 August 2018)).

Bader Markus, Meng Michael, Bayer Josef (2000). Case and reanalysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29, 37–52.

Baggio Giosue (2008). Processing temporal constraints: An ERP study. Language Learning 58, 35–55.

Bates Douglas, Mächler Martin, Bolker Ben, Walker Steve (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Soft ware 67(1), 1–48.

R package lme4 version 1.1-17. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01.

Błaszczak Joanna, Jabłońska Patrycja, Klimek-Jankowska Dorota, Migdalski Krzysztof (2014). The riddle of future tense in Polish: How much ‘future’ is there in ‘future tense’? In Future Tense(s) / Future Time(s), Philippe De Brabanter, Mikhail Kissine, Saghie Sharifzadeh (eds.), 165–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bock Kathryn, Eberhard Kathleen M. (1993). Meaning, sound and syntax in English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes 8, 57–99.

Bock Kathryn, Eberhard Kathleen M., Cutting J. Cooper (2004). Producing number agreement: How pronouns equal verbs. Journal of Memory and Language 51, 251–278.

Bos Laura S., Dragoy Olga, Stowe Laurie A., Bastiaanse Roelien (2013). Time reference teased apart from tense: Thinking beyond the present. Journal of Neurolinguistics 26, 283–297.

Coulson Seana, King Jonathan W., Kutas Marta (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes 13, 21–58.

Dillon Brian, Nevins Andrew, Austin Alison C., Phillips Colin (2012). Syntactic and semantic predictors of tense in Hindi: An ERP investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes 27(3), 313–344.

Dornisch Ewa (1997). Auxiliaries and functional projections in Polish. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics (FASL) IV: The Cornell Meeting 1995. (= Michigan Slavic Materials 39), Wayles Browne, Ewa Dornisch, Natasha Kondrashova, Draga ZEC (eds.), 183–209. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publishers.

Drenhaus Heiner, Frisch Stefan, Saddy Douglas (2005). Processing negative polarity items: When negation comes through the backdoor. In Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical, and Computational Perspectives (= Studies in Generative Grammar 85). Stephan Kepser and Marga Reis (eds.), 145–165. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Eberhard Kathleen M., Cutting J. Cooper, Bock Kathryn (2005). Making syntax of sense: Number agreement in sentence production. Psychological Review 112, 531–559.

Fisiak Jacek, Lipińska-Grzegorek Maria, Zabrocki Tadeusz (1978). An Introductory English-Polish Contrastive Grammar. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

Jasper Herbert H. (1958). The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 10, 371–375.

Häussler Jana (2012). The Emergence of Attraction Errors during Sentence Comprehension. PhD thesis, University of Konstanz (revised version for publication).

Hagoort Peter (2003). Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15, 883–899.

Lenth Russell (2019). emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.4.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans. 

Łaziński Marek (2006). O panach i paniach (Polskie rzeczowniki tytularne i ich asymetria rodzajowopłciowa) [About gentlemen and ladies (Polish nouns of address and their asymmetry in gender and sex)]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Mikoś Michael J. (1985). Alternative forms of the future imperfective tense in Polish. Slavic and East European Journal 29, 448–460.

Molinaro Nicola, Kim Albert, Vespignani Francesco, Job Remo (2008). Anaphoric agreement violation: An ERP analysis of its interpretation. Cognition 106, 963–974.

Münte Thomas F., Matzke Mike, Johannes Sönke (1997). Brain activity associated with syntactic incongruencies in words and pseudo-words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9, 318–329.

Nevins Andrew, Dillon Brian, Malhotra Shiti, Phillips Colin (2007). The role of feature-number and feature-type in processing Hindi verb agreement violations. Brain Research 116(4), 481–494.

Oldfield R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9, 97–113.

Phillips Colin, Wagers Matthew W., Lau Ellen F. (2011). Grammatical illusions and selective fallibility in real-time language comprehension. In Experiments at the Interfaces (= Syntax and Semantics 37), Jeffrey T. Runner (ed.), 153–186. Bingley: Emerald.

R Core Team. 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/. 

Spencer Andrew (2001). The paradigm-based model of morphosyntax. Transactions of the Philological Society 99(2), 279–313.

Tajsner Przemyslaw (1999). A minimalist analysis of compound future in Polish. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 33, 119–131.

Tremblay Antoine, Ransijn Johannes (2015). LMERConvenienceFunctions: Model Selection and Post-hoc Analysis for (G)LMER Models. R package version 2.10. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=LMERConvenienceFunctions 

Witkoś Jacek (1998). The Syntax of Clitics: Steps towards a Minimalist Account. Poznań: motivex.

Zhang Yaxu, Zhang Jingting (2008). Brain responses to agreement violations of Chinese grammatical aspect. NeuroReport 19(10), 1039–1043.