A Relevance-Theoretic Account of Some Constraints on Syntactic Parentheticals: Evidence from English and Polish
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEA Relevance-Theoretic Account of Some Constraints on Syntactic Parentheticals: Evidence from English and Polish
Publication date: 24.03.2016
Studies in Polish Linguistics, Volume 10 (2015), Vol. 10, Issue 4, pp. 175 - 196
https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920SPL.15.008.1789Authors
A Relevance-Theoretic Account of Some Constraints on Syntactic Parentheticals: Evidence from English and Polish
Blakemore Diane (2005). and-parentheticals. Journal of Pragmatics 37(8): 1165−1181.
Blakemore Diane (2006). Divisions of labour: The analysis of parentheticals. Lingua 116: 1670−1687.
Blakemore Diane (2007). ‘Or’-parentheticals, ‘that is’-parentheticals and the pragmatics of reformulation. Journal of Linguistics 43(2): 311−339.
Blakemore Diane (2009). On the relevance of parentheticals. Actes d’IDP 09: 9−17.
Carston Robyn (2002). Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dehé Nicole (2010). Parentheticals. In The Pragmatics Encyclopedia, Louise Cummings (ed.), 307−308. Oxford: Routledge.
Dehé Nicole, Kavalova Yordanka (2006). The syntax, pragmatics and prosody of parenthetical what. English Language and Linguistics 10(2): 289−320.
Green Mitchell S. (2000). Illocutionary force and semantic content. Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 435−473.
Grimshaw Jane (2011). The place of slifting in the English complement system. Generative Initiatives in Syntactic Theory 3, Handout. [URL: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B1DtOqeuIhA3Nzg2NDNmNzEtMmFkZC00N2VjLThjYmUtNmM0MTA1MzUxMWNj/edit?hl=en_US; accessed February 10, 2016.]
Hooper Joan B. (1975). On assertive predicates. In Syntax and Semantics IV, John Kimball (ed.), 91−124. New York: Academic Press.
Hooper Joan B., Thompson Sandra A. (1973). On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 465−497.
Ifantidou Elly (2001). Evidentials and Relevance. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Ifantidou-Trouki Elly (1993). Sentential adverbs and relevance. Lingua 90(1–2): 69−90.
Jackendoff Ray (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Jary Mark (2011). Assertion, relevance and the declarative mood. Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface 25: 267−289.
Kavalova Yordanka (2007). And-parenthetical clauses. In Parentheticals, Nicole Dehé, Yordanka Kavalova (eds.), 145−147. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Moeschler Jacques (2013). Is a speaker-based pragmatics possible? Or how can a hearer infer a speaker’s commitment? Journal of Pragmatics 43(1): 84−97.
Morency Patrick et al. (2008). Explicitness, implicitness and commitment attribution: A cognitive pragmatic approach. In Commitment, Philippe de Brabanter, Patrick Dendale (eds.), 197−220. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Papafragou Anna (2006). Epistemic modality and truth conditions. Lingua 116(10): 1688−1702.
Rooryck Johan (2001). Evidentiality, Parts I and II. Glot International 5: 4−5.
Ross John R. (1973). Slifting. In The Formal Analysis of Natural Language, Maurice Gross, Morris Halle, Marcel Schützenberger (eds.), 133−172. The Hague: Mouton.
Simons Mandy (2007). Observations on embedding verbs, evidentiality, and presupposition. Lingua 117(6): 1034−1056.
Speas Peggy (2004). Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua 114(3): 255−277.
Sperber Dan, Clément Fabrice, Heintz Christophe, Mascaro Oliver, Mercier Hugo, Origgi Gloria, Wilson Deirdre (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind and Language 25(4): 359−393.
Sperber Dan, Wilson Deirdre (1986/1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sperber Dan, Wilson Deirdre (2015). Beyond speaker’s meaning. Croatian Journal of Philosophy XV(44): 117−149.
Stalnaker Robert (2002). Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5–6): 701−721.
Urmson James O. (1952). Parenthetical verbs. Mind 61: 480−496.
Wilson Deirdre (1994). Relevance and understanding. In Language and Understanding, Gillian Brown, Kirsten Malmkjaer, Alastair Pollitt and John Williams (eds.), 35−58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilson Deirdre (2011). The conceptual-procedural distinction: Past, present and future. In Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, Victoria Escandell-Vidal, Manuel Leonetti and Aoife Ahern (eds.), 3−31. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
Wilson Deirdre (2012). Modality and the conceptual-procedural distinction. In Relevance Theory: More than Understanding, Ewa Wałaszewska, Agnieszka Piskorska (eds.), 23−43. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Wilson Deirdre, Sperber Dan (1993). Linguistic Form and Relevance. Lingua 90(1–2): 1−25.
Information: Studies in Polish Linguistics, Volume 10 (2015), Vol. 10, Issue 4, pp. 175 - 196
Article type: Original article
Titles:
A Relevance-Theoretic Account of Some Constraints on Syntactic Parentheticals: Evidence from English and Polish
Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków, Poland
Published at: 24.03.2016
Article status: Open
Licence: None
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
EnglishView count: 2181
Number of downloads: 1917