FAQ

Tom 23, Numer 4

Laboratoria Kultury Współczesnej

2022 Następne

Data publikacji: 12.2022

Opis

Projekt dofinansowany przez Uniwersytet Jagielloński ze środków Wydziału Zarządzania i Komunikacji Społecznej, a także Instytutu Kultury.

Projekt okładki i grafiki: Mateusz Kula

Licencja: CC BY  ikona licencji

Redakcja

Redaktor naczelny Orcid Małgorzata Ćwikła

Zastępca redaktora naczelnego Orcid Marcin Laberschek

Sekretarz redakcji Olga Kosińska

Redakcja numeru 4 Piotr Graczyk, Alicja Kędziora

Zawartość numeru

Mateusz Falkowski

Zarządzanie w Kulturze, Tom 23, Numer 4, 2022, s. 349 - 356

https://doi.org/10.4467/20843976ZK.22.023.17255

Laboratory Questions

Laboratory still is a relatively new form of doing human sciences. One that is novel and somewhat foreign at its staring point. In the text the author discusses the intuitive associations – that are not always explicitly stated – hidden behind the idea of the laboratory, in particular this institution’s affinity with theatre, factory and workshop.

Czytaj więcej Następne

Marcin Laberschek

Zarządzanie w Kulturze, Tom 23, Numer 4, 2022, s. 357 - 379

https://doi.org/10.4467/20843976ZK.22.024.17256

Abstraction and Reality. Enterprises of the Polish People’s Republic as the Factories of Art

Part of enterprises that were active during the time of Polish People’s Republic was fulfilling the role of an industrial art patrons, sponsoring and organising different types of artistic projects. The factories were however first and foremost obliged to fulfil the national industrial plans and their production norms, both of which could be impeded by their cultural and artistic activities. In this article the author poses a following question: why was it that the enterprises were sponsoring artistic events and how were they benefitting from it? To provide an answer, the author focused on three events under the industrial patronage – Biennale of Spatial Forms in Elbląg, 1st Symposium of Fine Artists and Scientists in Puławy as well as 1st Biennale of Metal Sculptures in Warsaw – and conducted an analysis of scientific and specialist literature on their topic. On this basis, the author drew the conclusion that the advantages related to the patronage had mostly a social character and resulted from building positive relations with the authorities, local communities and employees.

Czytaj więcej Następne

Michał Pałasz

Zarządzanie w Kulturze, Tom 23, Numer 4, 2022, s. 381 - 397

https://doi.org/10.4467/20843976ZK.22.025.17257

Kill Marketing, Death to Management!

The aim of the paper is to show that management and marketing, in terms of their interpretations dominating in the Polish higher education, are structurally unsustainable in a world that attempts to respond to the climatic and ecological challenges. The subject and starting point of the article is the critique of two popular definitions of management and marketing. The research problem relates to the incompatibility of social practices, such as contemporary management and marketing, with the scale of the challenges of the Anthropocene and the need to search for new, even utopian, ways of organizing reality. The main research questions are: are management and marketing practices in their current shape sustainable in a world that has decided to face the climatic and ecological challenges, and why is so.

Czytaj więcej Następne

Małgorzata Ćwikła

Zarządzanie w Kulturze, Tom 23, Numer 4, 2022, s. 399 - 403

https://doi.org/10.4467/20843976ZK.22.026.17258

* Recenzja powstała w wyniku realizacji projektu badawczego o numerze 2021/05/X/HS4/00317 (Testowanie metody dyfrakcyjnej w naukach o zarządzaniu), finansowanego ze środków Narodowego Centrum Nauki.

Czytaj więcej Następne