Przegląd Kulturoznawczy, Numer 2 (24) , 2015, s. 97 - 107
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843860PK.14.006.3524Przegląd Kulturoznawczy, Numer 2 (24) , 2015, s. 108 - 125
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843860PK.14.007.3525Przegląd Kulturoznawczy, Numer 2 (24) , 2015, s. 126 - 139
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843860PK.14.008.3526Przegląd Kulturoznawczy, Numer 2 (24) , 2015, s. 140 - 150
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843860PK.14.009.3527Przegląd Kulturoznawczy, Numer 2 (24) , 2015, s. 151 - 159
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843860PK.14.010.3528Przegląd Kulturoznawczy, Numer 2 (24) , 2015, s. 160 - 173
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843860PK.14.011.3529Przegląd Kulturoznawczy, Numer 2 (24) , 2015, s. 174 - 178
Słowa kluczowe: cinema, philosophy, ontology, time, eternal return, Bergson, Deleuze, new media and the book market, sociology of culture, sociology of literature, publishing movement, Bourdieu, cultural industries, creative industries, literary production in Poland, double life of writers, conditions of creative work, self-organization, cultural workers’ movement, literary agent, literature and business, symbolic capital, economic capital, professionalization of the publishing market, sociology of literature, Bourdieu, literary field, Polish literature, canon, contemporary literature, education, habitus, Pierre Bourdieu