Arts & Cultural Studies Review, Issue 2 (24) , 2015, pp. 97 - 107
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843860PK.14.006.3524Arts & Cultural Studies Review, Issue 2 (24) , 2015, pp. 108 - 125
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843860PK.14.007.3525Arts & Cultural Studies Review, Issue 2 (24) , 2015, pp. 126 - 139
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843860PK.14.008.3526Arts & Cultural Studies Review, Issue 2 (24) , 2015, pp. 140 - 150
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843860PK.14.009.3527Arts & Cultural Studies Review, Issue 2 (24) , 2015, pp. 151 - 159
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843860PK.14.010.3528Arts & Cultural Studies Review, Issue 2 (24) , 2015, pp. 160 - 173
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843860PK.14.011.3529Arts & Cultural Studies Review, Issue 2 (24) , 2015, pp. 174 - 178
Słowa kluczowe: cinema, philosophy, ontology, time, eternal return, Bergson, Deleuze, publishing movement, Bourdieu, cultural industries, creative industries, new media and the book market, sociology of culture, sociology of literature, literary production in Poland, double life of writers, conditions of creative work, self-organization, cultural workers’ movement, literary agent, literature and business, symbolic capital, economic capital, professionalization of the publishing market, sociology of literature, Bourdieu, literary field, Polish literature, canon, contemporary literature, education, habitus, Pierre Bourdieu