Housing Environment, 24/2018, 2018, pp. 3 - 3
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.18.051.9641Housing Environment, 24/2018, 2018, pp. 4 - 12
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.18.052.9642Housing Environment, 24/2018, 2018, pp. 13 - 25
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.18.053.9643Housing Environment, 24/2018, 2018, pp. 26 - 33
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.18.054.9644Housing Environment, 24/2018, 2018, pp. 34 - 41
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.18.055.9645Housing Environment, 24/2018, 2018, pp. 42 - 49
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.18.056.9646Housing Environment, 24/2018, 2018, pp. 50 - 59
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.18.057.9647Housing Environment, 24/2018, 2018, pp. 60 - 73
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.18.058.9648Housing Environment, 24/2018, 2018, pp. 74 - 81
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.18.059.9649Housing Environment, 24/2018, 2018, pp. 82 - 88
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.18.060.9650Housing Environment, 24/2018, 2018, pp. 89 - 98
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.18.061.9651Housing Environment, 24/2018, 2018, pp. 99 - 110
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.18.062.9652Współczesne znaczenia wody i zieleni w biurowcu wizytówce – na przykładzie Business Tower Norymberga
Housing Environment, 24/2018, 2018, pp. 111 - 119
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.18.063.9653Housing Environment, 24/2018, 2018, pp. 120 - 129
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.18.064.9654Housing Environment, 24/2018, 2018, pp. 130 - 141
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.18.065.9655Housing Environment, 24/2018, 2018, pp. 142 - 149
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.18.066.9656Housing Environment, 24/2018, 2018, pp. 150 - 163
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.18.067.9657Housing Environment, 24/2018, 2018, pp. 164 - 167
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.18.068.9658Housing Environment, 24/2018, 2018, pp. 168 - 178
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.18.069.9659Housing Environment, 24/2018, 2018, pp. 179 - 185
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.18.070.9660Housing Environment, 24/2018, 2018, pp. 186 - 250
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.18.071.9661Słowa kluczowe: river, Vistula River boulevards, public space, urban space, riverfront areas, revitalisation, eco-expo, greenery in architecture, water in architecture, Urban Heat Island, microclimate, law regulations, houses, water law agreement, sewage system, tight water tank, ‘green city’, system, ecosystem, urban space, community, sustainable development, vegetation in the interior, green interior, green walls, potted plants, water in the interior, winter garden, conservatory, atrium, sustaina¬ble development, water, public space, urban and landscape solutions, city, composition, waterfronts, pocket parks, edge zone, sustainable mobility, walkability, water in the city, public greenery, sustainable development, architectural and urban composition, natural compositional elements, housing environment, housing complexes, park, public space, landscape urbanism, spaces of culture, European city, office building, recreational space, greenery and water, city showcase, company showcase, Green Infrastructure, recreation, river in the city, ecosystem services, revitalisation of rivers, garden festivals, Gartenschau Germany, geothermal baths, geothermal energy, hot tub, infinity pool, the landscape, public space, Iceland, Green areas, semi-private backyard gardens, housing estate, architecture of seaside regions, residential architecture, Western Pomerania, spiritual structure of the city, lost object of cultural heritage, history of cathedral recreation, Water, architecture in greenery, water reflection, sustainable design, post-industrial areas, revitalisation, post-industrial urban landscape, environment in revitalised areas, water, greenery, architecture of single-family detached houses, architectural form