Housing Environment, 40/2022, 2022, pp. 4 - 17
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.22.018.17001Housing Environment, 40/2022, 2022, pp. 18 - 28
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.22.019.17002Housing Environment, 40/2022, 2022, pp. 29 - 44
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.22.020.17003Housing Environment, 40/2022, 2022, pp. 45 - 56
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.22.022.17004Housing Environment, 40/2022, 2022, pp. 57 - 66
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.22.023.17005Housing Environment, 40/2022, 2022, pp. 67 - 83
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.22.024.17006Housing Environment, 40/2022, 2022, pp. 84 - 95
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.22.025.17007Słowa kluczowe: Polish sacred architecture, postmodernism, housing estates, large housing estates, public space, public life, sacralisation, desacralisation, sacred landscape, the sacred, the profane, sign, designatum, ritual, Kraków, Lviv, locus sacer, place identity, modern sacral buildings, housing environment, city, Singapore, locus sacer, sacrum, modern sacral buildings, new residential districts, city, Freiburg, sacred architecture, urban composition, universalism, archetype, housing environment, sacrum, urban form, residential areas, accessibility analysis
