Housing Environment, 34/2021, 2021, pp. 5 - 18
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.21.004.13643Nowe kierunki rozwoju architektury wież mieszkalnych na wybranych przykładach – Manhattan, Nowy Jork
Housing Environment, 34/2021, 2021, pp. 19 - 32
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.21.003.13642Housing Environment, 34/2021, 2021, pp. 33 - 43
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.21.002.13641Housing Environment, 34/2021, 2021, pp. 44 - 57
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.21.009.13647Housing Environment, 34/2021, 2021, pp. 58 - 77
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.21.006.13645Housing Environment, 34/2021, 2021, pp. 78 - 89
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.21.005.13644Housing Environment, 34/2021, 2021, pp. 90 - 95
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.21.010.13648Housing Environment, 34/2021, 2021, pp. 96 - 111
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.21.007.13646Housing Environment, 34/2021, 2021, pp. 112 - 119
https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.21.001.13640Słowa kluczowe: Los Angeles, metropolis, icon, highway, film, Hollywood, New York, residential tower, Manhattan, Billionaires’ Row, Longyearbyen, Gruvedalen, social space, Svalbard, Spitsbergen, spatial structure of the city, revitalization program, closed areas, sustainable development, degraded area, larger urban unit, urban planning, housing architecture, sustainable environment, cultural landscape of the city, architecture for children, the influence of architecture and surroundings on human development, architecture and nature in the context of educational facilities, Architecture, urban planning, urban space, urban design, ecological city, sustainable city, re-urbanization, master plan, development plan, urban public space, planning system, housing in Masuria, archetype, tradition, modernity
