Transport Geography Papers of Polish Geographical Society, 23 (4), 2020, pp. 5 - 6
Transport Geography Papers of Polish Geographical Society, 23 (4), 2020, pp. 7 - 18
https://doi.org/10.4467/2543859XPKG.20.023.13125Transport Geography Papers of Polish Geographical Society, 23 (4), 2020, pp. 19 - 31
https://doi.org/10.4467/2543859XPKG.20.024.13126Transport Geography Papers of Polish Geographical Society, 23 (4), 2020, pp. 32 - 41
https://doi.org/10.4467/2543859XPKG.20.025.13127Transport Geography Papers of Polish Geographical Society, 23 (4), 2020, pp. 42 - 48
https://doi.org/10.4467/2543859XPKG.20.026.13128Transport Geography Papers of Polish Geographical Society, 23 (4), 2020, pp. 49 - 60
https://doi.org/10.4467/2543859XPKG.20.027.13129Transport Geography Papers of Polish Geographical Society, 23 (4), 2020, pp. 61 - 62
Słowa kluczowe: Bike sharing, European Union funds, cycling, mobility., railway line Brest–Włodawa, railwayline Chełm–Włodawa, cross-border railway line, railway tourism, tourist assets, MCA, Cracow, GTFS, accessibility, sustainable mobility, mobility indicator, transport policy, survey research, car travel, modern ICT solutions, ICT, transport needs, seniors