Transport Geography Papers of Polish Geographical Society, 23 (3), 2020, pp. 5 - 6
Transport Geography Papers of Polish Geographical Society, 23 (3), 2020, pp. 7 - 14
https://doi.org/10.4467/2543859XPKG.20.016.12784Transport Geography Papers of Polish Geographical Society, 23 (3), 2020, pp. 15 - 28
https://doi.org/10.4467/2543859XPKG.20.017.12785Transport Geography Papers of Polish Geographical Society, 23 (3), 2020, pp. 29 - 40
https://doi.org/10.4467/2543859XPKG.20.018.12786Transport Geography Papers of Polish Geographical Society, 23 (3), 2020, pp. 41 - 60
https://doi.org/10.4467/2543859XPKG.20.019.12787Transport Geography Papers of Polish Geographical Society, 23 (3), 2020, pp. 61 - 68
https://doi.org/10.4467/2543859XPKG.20.020.12788Transport Geography Papers of Polish Geographical Society, 23 (3), 2020, pp. 69 - 83
https://doi.org/10.4467/2543859XPKG.20.021.12789Transport Geography Papers of Polish Geographical Society, 23 (3), 2020, pp. 84 - 90
https://doi.org/10.4467/2543859XPKG.20.022.12790Transport Geography Papers of Polish Geographical Society, 23 (3), 2020, pp. 91 - 92
Transport Geography Papers of Polish Geographical Society, 23 (3), 2020, pp. 93 - 94
Słowa kluczowe: comparative analysis, Krakow, public transport indicators, connectivity, accessibility, sustainable mobility in cities, older persons, interview, Łódź, public transport, Bike-sharing, cycling, mobility, big data, Poznań, transport, post-socialist EU countries, highways, expressways, marine transport, seaport, green ports, sustainable development, transport, intermodal transport, sustainable development, sustainable transport, digital governance, digital inequality, centers of interoperable governance, artificial intelligence, transportation geo-information startups.