FAQ
T_LOGIN Log in

Don't have an account on our website?

T_REGISTER Register

Problems of Forensic Sciences

Description

Problems of Forensic Sciences has been published since 1960 by the Institute of Forensic  Research Publishers and accepts papers from a broad range of forensic sciences and related disciplines. Problems of Forensic Sciences is published quarterly, with all articles appearing in both English and Polish. A free electronic version of the journal is also available at this website. All authors who would like to contribute to our periodical are cordially invited to submit papers.

ISSN: 1230-7483

eISSN: 2720-5983

MNiSW points: 70

UIC ID: 27203

Abbreviations: Z Zag. Nauk Sądow.

DOI: 10.4467/12307483PFS

Editorial team

Editor-in-Chief:
Prof. Józef K. Gierowski
Deputy Editor-in-Chief:
Prof. dr hab. Dariusz Zuba
Sekretarz redakcji:
Anna Sałatarow-Kraciuk
Editors:
Dr Agnieszka Haś
Dr Tomasz Kupiec
Prof. Grzegorz Zadora

Affiliation

Professor Jan Sehn Institute of Forensic Research in Kraków

Journal content

see all issues Next

142–143

Publication date: 10.12.2025

Editor-in-Chief: Józef K. Gierowski

Deputy Editor-in-Chief: Dariusz Zuba

Sekretarz redakcji: Anna Sałatarow-Kraciuk

Issue content

Inga Markiewicz

Problems of Forensic Sciences, 142–143, 2025

Aim: The aim of this paper is to describe the assumptions of the Good Lives Model (GLM) in the context of traditional therapeutic methods based on risk management (RNR), as well as to assess its usefulness and effectiveness in therapeutic and rehabilitative work with patients in forensic psychiatric units.
Main results: According to the GLM approach, an effective way to reduce the risk of reoffending is to provide forensic patients with the necessary conditions for a better life and to develop their ability to meet their needs (or acquire goods important to them) using socially acceptable means and methods. This involves learning how to live a “good life” and adopting desirable behavior patterns as alternatives to previous unlawful behaviors. Working within the GLM framework yields better therapeutic outcomes than relying solely on methods aimed at minimizing the risk of recidivism.
Practical implications for forensic science: The dissemination of the GLM concept in Polish forensic psychiatric units would enable staff working with mental health offenders to take a broader perspective on the issue of their social maladjustment and the etiology of unlawful behavior. It would also equip professionals with additional ideas and tools for therapeutic work. As a result of the rehabilitation efforts undertaken, the likelihood of patients committing offenses after being discharged from forensic units should decrease.
Read more Next

Jacek Kudera, Naima Islam Nodi, Julia Roegner

Problems of Forensic Sciences, 142–143, 2025

Identical twins present a difficult case for both auditory and machine speaker recognition. This paper addresses this challenge and presents the findings of two studies: an auditory speaker discrimination test and a machine-based task using forensic automatic speaker recognition (ASR) system. The outcomes of the perceptual judgement task were compared with the log-likelihood ratios (LLRs) yielded by an x-vector-based speaker recognition system. Although the task was given to lay listeners, as opposed to forensic phonetic experts, the results appear to be congruent with the scores yielded by a state-of-the-art automatic system. The human raters were more accurate in judging same-speaker pairs than different-speaker pairs. The machine approach showed better performance in both conditions tested as compared to human listeners. Overall, the voices that were difficult for human listeners were different from those that the ASR system struggled with.
Read more Next