FAQ

Comparison of Gurumukhi and Latin scripts in handwriting identification: A forensic perspective

Publication date: 03.12.2021

Problems of Forensic Sciences, 2021, 125, pp. 5 - 17

https://doi.org/10.4467/12307483PFS.20.001.14781

Authors

,
Amanpreet Kaur
Department of Forensic Science and Chemistry, RIMT University, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India
All publications →
,
R. K. Garg
Department of Forensic Science, Punjabi University, Patiala, Punjab, India
All publications →
Meenakshi Mahajan
Regional Forensic Science Laboratory, Dharamshala, HP, India
All publications →

Titles

Comparison of Gurumukhi and Latin scripts in handwriting identification: A forensic perspective

Abstract

The present study has been carried out to study the possibility of handwriting comparison in cases where document under question is inscribed in different language and the available standards are in other language. The aspect is prevalent in the field of languages since people around the globe are being attracted to learn new languages, but their native language always has some impact on the next learned languages. Punjabi is the first language taught in the schools of Punjab and other languages afterward. Punjabi is the mother tongue of Punjab area and in contemporary times most of the population of Punjab leaning towards learning English language. For this study, 1200 samples in Punjabi and English from 100 individuals who studied English as well as Punjabi and using these languages on a daily basis were collected and analyzed. Class characteristics like alignment, slant, size, the arrangement of a piece of handwriting, connections, fluency line quality of handwriting along with the characters of letter form and formation were considered and the results were further analyzed statistically using Chi-square test. The results of the present study revealed the handwriting written in distinct scripts is similar and comparable with each other. Additionally, the study will help correlate a person’s handwriting with ethnicity, nationality, and region based on the characters present in the handwriting samples.

References

1. Cheng, n., Lee, G. K., Yap, B. S., Lee, L. T., Tan, S. C., Tan, K. P. (2005). Investigation of class characteristics in English handwriting of the three main racial groups: Chinese, Malay and Indian in Singapore. Journal of Forensic Science, 50(1), 1–8.

2. Ellis, A. W. (1979). Slips of the pen. Visible Language, 13(3), 273.

3. English language. Retrieved September 20, 2020 from: https://omniglot.com/writing/english.htm.

4. Gill, H., Gleason, H. A. (1963). A reference grammar of Punjabi. Patiala: Punjabi University Publication.

5. Gurumukhi. Retrieved October 13, 2020 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gurmukhi.

6. huber, r. A., headrick, A. M. (1999). Handwriting identification: Facts and fundamentals. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

7. Jasuja, O. P., Komal, Singh, S. (1996). Examination of Gurumukhi script: a preliminary report. Science and Justice, 36(1), 9–13.

8. Kaur, A., Singh, M., Jasuja, O. P. (2017). Interscript comparison of handwriting features leading to their identification and authorship. Nowa Kodyfikacja Prawa Karnego, 45, 15–36.

9. Kelly, J. S., Lindblom, B. S. (2006). Scientific examination of questioned documents. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

10. Ledić, A., Rosandić, G. (2018). Comparing Latin with Cyrillic script in handwriting identification? Policija i sigurnost, 28(1), 27–43.

11. Masica, C. P. (1991). Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

12. Osborn, A. S. (1929). Questioned documents. Albany: Boyd Printing Co.

13. Saini, K., Kaur, n. (2018). Forensic examination of class characteristics in English handwriting of the three states: Andhra Pradesh, Punjab and Kashmir in India. Arab Journal of Forensic Sciences and Forensic Medicine1(8), 1034–1047.

14. Saxena, H. M., Singh, M. (1992). Classification of the writing elements in Devanagari scripts. Journal of Forensic Science Society, 32(2), 143–150.

15. Singh, A., Gupta, S. C., Saxena, H. M. (1994). Influence of the primary language and idiosyncratic features in simple forgeries. Journal of Forensic Science Society34(2), 83–87.

16. Turnbull, S. J., Jones, A. E., Allen, M. (2010). Identification of class characteristics of Polish people writing in English. Journal of Forensic Science, 55(5), 1296–1303. 

17. Turner, I. J., Sidhu, R. K., Love, J. M. (2008). A preliminary study investigating class characteristics in Gurumukhi handwriting of 1st and 2nd generation Punjabis. Science and Justice, 48, 126–132.

Information

Information: Problems of Forensic Sciences, 2021, 125, pp. 5 - 17

Article type: Original article

Titles:

Polish:

Comparison of Gurumukhi and Latin scripts in handwriting identification: A forensic perspective

English:

Comparison of Gurumukhi and Latin scripts in handwriting identification: A forensic perspective

Authors

Department of Forensic Science and Chemistry, RIMT University, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India

Department of Forensic Science, Punjabi University, Patiala, Punjab, India

Regional Forensic Science Laboratory, Dharamshala, HP, India

Published at: 03.12.2021

Received at: 23.11.2020

Accepted at: 31.07.2021

Article status: Open

Licence: CC BY-NC-ND  licence icon

Percentage share of authors:

Amanpreet Kaur (Author) - 33%
R. K. Garg (Author) - 33%
Meenakshi Mahajan (Author) - 34%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

English, Polish