FAQ

Analysis of the most popular online BAC calculators

Publication date: 08.05.2024

Problems of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 136, pp. 321 - 340

https://doi.org/10.4467/12307483PFS.23.019.19626

Authors

,
Dominika Jama
Institute of Forensic Research, Kraków, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4479-555X Orcid
All publications →
,
Karolina Sekuła
Institute of Forensic Research, Kraków, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8061-9388 Orcid
All publications →
Dariusz Zuba
Institute of Forensic Research, Kraków, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5133-1756 Orcid
All publications →

Titles

Analysis of the most popular online BAC calculators

Abstract

In order to check their sobriety after drinking alcohol, drivers can use applications available online that perform prospective estimation of alcohol content, called ‘alcomat online’ or ‘BA C calculators’.
The aim of the study was to analyse the method of performing calculations using ‘BA C calculators’ available on the Internet and to assess their reliability.
The five most popular ‘calculators’ found in the Google search engine and a commercial one were analysed. The applications were tested by entering data on 10 cases of alcohol consumption by people were tested for alcohol content in exhaled air using the Alcotest 7510 analyser and alcohol curves were plotted for them. Then, real ethanol concentrations and complete ethanol elimination times for these people were compared with values calculated by the applications.
The analysed ‘calculators’ base their calculations on various principles. Both the maximum alcohol concentrations and the time of their occurrence varied among the applications, but all seem to use the alcohol distribution coefficient established by Widmark. The use of individual elimination rates ranging from 0.12 to even 0.3‰/h was also observed. The time for complete alcohol elimination indicated by the applications was in most cases longer than the actual time.
Online applications such as the ‘BA C calculator’ available to Polish users may be helpful tools for determining the time of complete elimination of alcohol from the body. However, due to the different calculation methods used in applications, which sometimes lead to different conclusions, they should be approached with great caution. These applications will not replace reliable sobriety tests, e.g. analysis of exhaled air.

References

  1. Forrest, A. R. W. (1986). Commentary: estimation of Widmark’s factor. Journal of the Forensic Sciences Society, 26(4), 249–252.
  2. Jama, D., Sekuła, K., Zuba, D. (2021). A comparison of prospective calculations with experimental alcohol curves. Problems of Forensic Sciences, 128, 241–258.
  3. Jones, A. W. (2010). Evidence-based survey of the elimination rates of ethanol from blood with applications in forensic casework. Forensic Science International, 200, 1–20.
  4. Jones, A. W. (2019). Alcohol, its absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion in the body and pharmacokinetic calculations. WIREs Forensic Science, e1340.
  5. Posey, D., Mozayani, A. (2007). The estimation of blood alcohol concentration Widmark revisited. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology, 3(1), 33–9.
  6. Rozporządzenia Ministra Zdrowia i Ministra Spraw Wewnętrznych i administracji z dnia 28 grudnia 2018 r. w sprawie badań na zawartość alkoholu w organizmie.
  7. Seidl, S., Jansen, U., Alt, A. (2000). The calculation of blood ethanol concentrations in males and females. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 1114, 71–77.
  8. Sekuła, K., Jama, D., Zuba, D. (2020). The influence of prospective calculation models on accuracy of determining the sobriety state. Problems of Forensic Sciences, 122/123, 143–163.
  9. Symon, E., Rzepka, P. (2022). Alkohol. (In) Wypadki drogowe w Polsce w 2022 roku (pp. 62–72). Warszawa: Wydział Opiniodawczo-Analityczny Biura Ruchu Drogowego Komendy Głównej Policji.
  10. Urlich, L., Kramer, Y., Zink, P. (1987). Relevance of individual parameters in the calculation of blood alcohol levels in relation to the volume of intake. Blutalkohol, 24, 192–198.
  11. U stawa z dnia 20 czerwca 1997 r. Prawo o ruchu drogowym (1997). Dziennik Ustaw, 98, 602.
  12. Watson, P. E., Watson, I. D., Batt, R. D. (1981). Prediction of blood alcohol concentrations in human subjects. Updating the Widmark equation. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 42, 547–556.
  13. Widmark, E. M. P. (1932). Die theoretischen Grundlagen und die praktische Verwendbakreit der gerichtlich-medizinischen Alkoholbestimmung. Berlin: Urban & Schwarzenberg [Translation to English in 1981 and entitled Principles and applications of medicolegal alcohol determinations. California: Biomedical Publications].
  14. Wilson, H., Stoyanow, R. S., Gandabhai, S., Baldwin, A. (2016). The quality and accuracy of mobile apps to prevent driving after drinking alcohol. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 4(3): e98.

Information

Information: Problems of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 136, pp. 321 - 340

Article type: Original article

Titles:

English: Analysis of the most popular online BAC calculators
Polish: Analysis of the most popular online BAC calculators = Analiza najpopularniejszych dostępnych w sieci „kalkulatorów trzeźwości”

Authors

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4479-555X

Dominika Jama
Institute of Forensic Research, Kraków, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4479-555X Orcid
All publications →

Institute of Forensic Research, Kraków, Poland

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8061-9388

Karolina Sekuła
Institute of Forensic Research, Kraków, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8061-9388 Orcid
All publications →

Institute of Forensic Research, Kraków, Poland

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5133-1756

Dariusz Zuba
Institute of Forensic Research, Kraków, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5133-1756 Orcid
All publications →

Institute of Forensic Research, Kraków, Poland

Published at: 08.05.2024

Received at: 11.12.2023

Accepted at: 18.01.2024

Article status: Open

Licence: CC BY-NC-ND  licence icon

Copyrights:

© Copyright by the Prof. Dr Jan Sehn Institute of Forensic Research in Kraków, Kraków 2023

Percentage share of authors:

Dominika Jama (Author) - 33.33%
Karolina Sekuła (Author) - 33.33%
Dariusz Zuba (Author) - 33.33%

Article corrections:

-

Publication languages:

English, Polish

View count: 400

Number of downloads: 134

Analysis of the most popular online BAC calculators