Interpretation of differences in a comparative analysis of handwriting
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEChoose format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEInterpretation of differences in a comparative analysis of handwriting
Publication date: 11.01.2024
Problems of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 134, pp. 133 - 141
https://doi.org/10.4467/12307483PFS.23.008.19057Authors
Interpretation of differences in a comparative analysis of handwriting
According to experts’ opinion which was also confirmed by many different experiments on handwriting, most errors made by document examiners result from a misjudgment (or misinterpretation) in the significance of a difference found between the questioned and exemplar materials. The article introduces a number of ideas for improving methodology for examination of handwriting, especially how to understand one of the main principles respecting writing identification that a writer cannot ameliorate his maximum writing ability or skill without effort, practice and/or training over a period of time, or how to prepare writing standards for examination of distorted writing.
1. Harralson, H. H. (2013). Developments in handwriting and signature identification in the digital age. Amsterdam: Anderson Publishing.
2. Huber, R. A., Headrick, A. M. (1999). Handwriting identification: Facts and fundamentals. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
3. Kelly, J. S., Angel, M. (2021). Forensic document examination in the 21st century. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
4. Kelly, J. S., Lindblom, B. S. (2006). Scientific examination of questioned documents. 2nd edition. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
5. Mohammed, L. A. (2019). Forensic examination of signatures. Academic Press.
6. Morris, R. N., Richards, G. B. (2010). What is the basis for a handwriting elimination? Journal of the American Society of Questioned Documents Examiners, 13(2), 43–63.
7. Napieralska-Ozga, E. (2002). Wybrane zagadnienia wpływu zmian ustroju psychofizycznego człowieka oraz innych czynników na wygląd pisma ręcznego, a w szczególności podpisów. (In) Z. Kegel (Ed.), Problematyka dowodu z ekspertyzy dokumentów (pp. 102–107). Wrocław: Uniwersytet Wrocławski.
8. Simsons, D., Spencer, R., Auer, S. (2011). The effects of constraining signatures. Journal of the American Society of Questioned Documents Examiners, 14(1), 39–50.
9. Slyter, S. A. (1995). Forensic signature examination. Springfield: Charles C Thomas Publisher.
10. Widła, T. (2002). Wpływ pozycji pisarskiej na grafizm. (In) Z. Kegel (Ed.), Problematyka dowodu z ekspertyzy dokumentów (pp. 389–391). Wrocław: Uniwersytet Wrocławski.
11. Wójtowicz-Garcarz, K. (2003). Ewolucja podpisu. (In) K. Wójtowicz-Garcarz, S. Podgajny, J. Koszelak, Zeszyt metodyczny nr 18: Wpływ czynników wolicjonalnych i pozawolicjonalnych na obraz podpisu (pp. 7–30). Warszawa: CLK KGP.
Information: Problems of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 134, pp. 133 - 141
Article type: Original article
Titles:
Interpretation of differences in a comparative analysis of handwriting
Interpretation of differences in a comparative analysis of handwriting
Published at: 11.01.2024
Received at: 01.06.2023
Accepted at: 11.09.2023
Article status: Open
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Percentage share of authors:
Article corrections:
-Publication languages:
English, PolishView count: 540
Number of downloads: 264
Suggested citations: Vancouver