Publication date: 06.11.2018
Licence:
CC BY-NC-ND
Editorial team
Issue editors dr Alicja Jagielska-Burduk; dr Żaneta Gwardzińska; dr Magdalena Marcinkowska, redaktor części Orzecznictwo
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 11 - 14
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 15 - 20
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 21 - 44
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.001.9762Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 45 - 62
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.002.9763Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 63 - 80
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.003.9764Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 81 - 96
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.004.9765Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 97 - 106
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.005.9766Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 107 - 118
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.006.9767Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 119 - 130
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.007.9768Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 131 - 140
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.008.9769Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 141 - 156
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.009.9770Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 157 - 170
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.010.9771Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 171 - 188
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.011.9772Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 189 - 214
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.012.9773Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 215 - 236
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.013.9774Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 237 - 239
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 240 - 242
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 243 - 246
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 247 - 250
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 251 - 252
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 253 - 254
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 255 - 259
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.014.9791Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 1/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 260 - 262
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.015.9792Słowa kluczowe: Art, pornography, crimes against sexual freedom, Censorship, freedom of art, limitations of free speech, Public international law, freedom of artistic expression, international adjudication, Criminal Code, offences, petty offences, administrative torts, the Act on the Protection of Monuments and the Guardianship of Monuments, the Restitution of National Cultural Property Act, Archaeology, artefacts, metal detecting, archaeological site, metal detector, damage of archaeological site, Construction permit, monument registration, conservation body, construction work, conservation permit, Monument, urban layout, register of monuments, Jean-Pierre Camus, roman dévot (pious romance), Palombe, ou la femme honorable, libertinage, French 17th century novel, The French Revolution, women, citizen rights, equality, family, identity, contestation, transgression, morality, stereotypes, modern woman, Insult religious feelings, freedom of expression, conflict of values, freedom of artistic expression, religious freedom, cultural heritage, museum, save haven, safeguarding, legislation, heritage in danger, art law, crime, statistics, national heritage, robbery, theft, damage