Publication date: 26.06.2019
Licence:
CC BY-NC-ND
Editorial team
Issue Editors Andrzej Jakubowski, Alicja Jagielska-Burduk
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 15 - 18
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 19 - 28
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.016.10370Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 29 - 50
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.017.10371Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 51 - 70
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.018.10372Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 71 - 88
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.019.10373Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 89 - 120
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.020.10374Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 121 - 142
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.021.10375Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 143 - 158
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.022.10376Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 159 - 184
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.023.10377Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 185 - 220
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.024.10378Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 221 - 250
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.025.10379Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 251 - 276
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.026.10380Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 277 - 304
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.18.027.10381Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 305 - 318
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 319 - 322
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 323 - 325
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 326 - 329
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 330 - 334
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 335 - 337
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 338 - 340
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 341 - 346
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 347 - 349
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 350 - 351
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 352 - 355
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 356 - 358
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 359 - 363
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 364 - 368
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 369 - 373
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2018 (4), 2018, pp. 374 - 378
Słowa kluczowe: European Parliament, European Year of Cultural Heritage, European Union, cultural policy, cultural heritage, Europe, cultural heritage, European Heritage Label, EYCH 2018, political and cultural community, illicit trafficking, cultural property, European Union, import, export, Syria, Iraq, armed conflict, Eastern Partnership, European Neighbourhood Policy, cultural heritage, Eastern Partnership Culture Programmes, Hasankeyf, Ilisu dam, cultural heritage protection, development projects, human rights, international cultural heritage law, preventive measures, criminal law, cultural property, soft law, Nicosia Convention, art, national heritage, art crime, public opinion, Slovenia, private property rights, criminal law, cultural heritage, civil law, ownership, looted art, restitution claims, alternative dispute resolution, European regulation, Nazi-looted art, Court of Arbitration for Art (CAfA), human rights, cultural heritage, Poland, Germany, reconciliation, restitution, cultural heritage, public policy, European Union, Italy, United Kingdom, private stakeholders, cultural property, diversity, cultural property legislation, cultural heritage law, religious heritage, non-state actors, Orthodox Church