2-2016 (2)

2016

Publication date: 17.02.2017

Licence: None

Editorial team

Deputy Editor-in-Chief Wojciech Szafrański

Issue editors Francesca Fiorentini, Kristin Hausler, Alicja Jagielska-Burduk, Andrzej Jakubowski

Issue content

Editorial

Francesca Fiorentini, Kristin Hausler, Alicja Jagielska-Burduk, Andrzej Jakubowski

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 9 - 20

PDF

Interview

The Santander Bank Foundation – 25 Years
of Cultural Patronage

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 21 - 26

PDF

Research Articles

Directive 2014/60: A New Legal Framework for Ensuring the Return of Cultural Objects within the European Union

Maciej Górka

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 27 - 34

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.16.016.6124

PDF

The Return of Illicitly Exported Cultural Objects: The Implementation of the 2014/60/EU Directive
in France

Sophie Vigneron

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 35 - 56

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.16.017.6125

PDF

Greek Law 4355/2015 Implementing Directive 2014/60/EU on the Return of Cultural Objects Unlawfully Removed from the Territory of a Member State

Irini A. Stamatoudi

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 57 - 70

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.16.018.6126

PDF

The Implementation of Directive 2014/60/EU and the Problems of the Compliance of Italian Legislation with International and EU Law

Manlio Frigo

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 71 - 84

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.16.019.6127

PDF

The Protection of Cultural Property: Recent Developments in Germany in the Context of New EU Law and the 1970 UNESCO Convention

Robert Peters

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 85 - 102

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.16.020.6128

PDF

The Implementation of Directive 2014/60/EU in the Netherlands

Marja van Heese

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 103 - 118

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.16.021.6129

PDF

The Implementation Process of Directive 2014/60/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
in Austrian Legislation

Bernard Łukańko

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 119 - 134

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.16.022.6130

PDF

The Lady or the Tiger? Legal Pitfalls of Implementing the Return of Cultural Goods Directive

Piotr Stec

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 135 - 148

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.16.023.6131

PDF

The 1995 UNIDROIT Convention: An Indispensable Complement to the 1970 UNESCO Convention and an Inspiration for the 2014/60/EU Directive

Marina Schneider

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 149 - 164

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.16.024.6132

PDF

Ratification of the 1995 UNIDROIT Convention
on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects,
in Light of Directive 2014/60/UE on the Return
of Cultural Objects Unlawfully Removed
from the Territory of a Member State:
The Perspective of Poland

Wojciech W. Kowalski

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 165 - 178

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.16.025.6133

PDF

Commentaries

Trading and Returning Cultural Objects under International Law

James A.R. Nafziger

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 179 - 194

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.16.026.6134

PDF

Directive 2014/60/EU and Its Effects on the European Art Market

Geo Magri

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 195 - 210

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.16.027.6135

PDF

Varia

The European Union’s Approach to Trade Restrictions on Cultural Property: A Trendsetter for the Protection of Cultural Property in Other Regions?

Richard Mackenzie-Gray Scott

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 211 - 236

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.16.028.6136

PDF

Debuts

Due Diligence Obligations in the New German
Cultural Property Protection Act

Paul Fabel

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 237 - 246

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.16.029.6137

PDF

Cultural Heritage in Poland

The Criminal Threat to Cultural Heritage
in Poland – An Analysis of the Events of 2015

Olgierd Jakubowski

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 247 - 262

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.16.030.6138

PDF

Events and Conferences

“Aim – the 1995 UNIDROIT Convention” Current Legal Instruments against Heist and the Illegal Exportation of Cultural Goods Warsaw, 17 December 2014

Magdalena Marcinkowska

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 263 - 265

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.16.032.6140

PDF

Looted Art and Cultural Property; Current Controversies, Future Resolutions The Seventh Annual Conference of the Lawyers’ Committee for Cultural Heritage Preservation, New York City, 25 March 2016

Editorial Report

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 266 - 269

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.16.033.6141

PDF

What does heritage change? A Review of the Third Biennial Conference of the Association of Critical Heritage Studies (ACHS), Montreal, 3-8 June 2016

Caecilia Alexandre

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 270 - 273

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.16.034.6142

PDF

A Review of the Second All Art and Cultural Heritage Law Conference, Geneva, 24-26 June 2016

Morgan Drake

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 274 - 276

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.16.035.6143

PDF

Call for Papers “Intangible Cultural Heritage – Successes, Problems and Challenges Ten Years After the Entry into Force of the UNESCO 2003 Convention”

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 277 - 280

PDF

Forthcoming HEURIGHT/SAACLR Conference: Cultural Heritage in the European Union: Legal Perspectives and Contemporary Challenges, 20-21 April 2017, Institute of Art of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 281 - 282

PDF

Book Reviews

Art, Museums, and Cultural Heritage through the Lens of Private Law – Recent Publications by Polish Authors (2013-2016)

Andrzej Jakubowski

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 283 - 289

PDF

Appendix

The Internal Market Information System (IMI) on the Return of Cultural Objects – Its Principles, Application, and Evaluation of Its Effectiveness for the Protection of Cultural Heritage

Olgierd Jakubowski

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2/2016 (2), 2016, pp. 290 - 312

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSR.16.031.6139

PDF

Files to download

Spis treści UNKOWN

Słowa kluczowe: European Union, Directive 2014/60/EU, Council Directive 93/7/EEC, Internal Market Information System, movement of cultural goods, illicit traffic in cultural goods, due diligence, good faith acquisition, France, protection of cultural heritage, European Union, Directive 2014/60/EU, Council Directive 93/7/EEC, movement of cultural goods, Greek implementation of Directive 2014/60/EU, illegal trade in art, unlawful movement of artefacts, Cultural heritage, cultural property, free movement of goods, restitution, return of cultural property, 1995 UNIDROIT Convention, Germany, EU, Single European Market, 1970 UNESCO Convention, import and export, return of cultural property, due diligence, Directive 2014/60/EU, Netherlands, protection cultural heritage, unlawful removal, due diligence and provenance, Cultural property, Austria, EU legislation, cultural significance, criminal liability, cultural goods, European Union, restitution, illicit export, private international law, Illicit traffic, Cultural objects, Due diligence, UNIDROIT, UNESCO, International Law, UNIDROIT, Directive 2014/60/EU, illicit export, restitution, Poland, international trade, cultural exception, national treasures, return of cultural objects, compliance with international obligations, Art market, economic assessment, circulation of cultural goods in the EU, cultural heritage law, cultural property, trade, Indigenous rights, international law, provenance, Due diligence, Directive 2014/60/EU, cultural property, burden of proof, criminality, cultural heritage, robbery, destruction, Internal Market Information System, European Union, national treasures, cultural objects, international cooperation

2/2016 (2)

2016 Next