Ethnographies, Volume 45, Issue 1, 2017, pp. 1 - 14
https://doi.org/10.4467/22999558.PE.17.001.7896Ethnographies, Volume 45, Issue 1, 2017, pp. 15 - 33
https://doi.org/10.4467/22999558.PE.17.002.7897Ethnographies, Volume 45, Issue 1, 2017, pp. 35 - 54
https://doi.org/10.4467/22999558.PE.17.003.7898Ethnographies, Volume 45, Issue 1, 2017, pp. 55 - 69
https://doi.org/10.4467/22999558.PE.17.004.7899Ethnographies, Volume 45, Issue 1, 2017, pp. 71 - 87
https://doi.org/10.4467/22999558.PE.17.005.7900Ethnographies, Volume 45, Issue 1, 2017, pp. 89 - 115
https://doi.org/10.4467/22999558.PE.17.006.7901Ethnographies, Volume 45, Issue 1, 2017, pp. 115 - 119
Ethnographies, Volume 45, Issue 1, 2017, pp. 123 - 143
Słowa kluczowe: tangible and intangible heritage, monument, lieux de mémoire, discourse, Armenia, Syrian-Armenians, Repatriates, Refugees, ancestral heritage, national identity, shaman, film, Kazakhness, Kazakhstan, Central Asia, polish minority, Ostrowiec District on Belarus, Belorusian SSR, historical awareness, lithuanian-belarusian borderland, footnote of memory, farm buildings, antique buildings, local heritage, Rabka Valley, regional architecture, discourse, essentialism, femininity, social conflict, locality
