FAQ

2017 Następne

Data publikacji: 21.12.2017

Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND  ikona licencji

Redakcja

Redakcja zeszytu Michał Klincewicz, Marta Siedlecka, Błażej Skrzypulec, Adrianna Smurzyńska, Aleksander Smywiński-Pohl

Zawartość numeru

Michał Jarmoc

Rocznik Kognitywistyczny, Tom 10, 2017, s. 1-14

https://doi.org/10.4467/20843895RK.17.001.7781
Using nonstandard arithmetical structures in cognitive modellingof numerical cognition
 
In the paper, we argue, that due to the existence of non-recursive numerical cognition, we cannot arbitrary exclude nonstandard arithmetical structures from the toolset used in cognitive modeling of numerical cognition. We introduce the concept of using nonstandard arithmetical structures in modelling, defend it against the claims and show examples of non--recursive numerical cognition.
Czytaj więcej Następne

Sidey Myoo

Rocznik Kognitywistyczny, Tom 10, 2017, s. 15-26

https://doi.org/10.4467/20843895RK.17.002.7782
Introduction to the universalist ontology of consciousness
 
In this article I raise the question about consciousness, which stems from a philosophical issue. Distinguishes here two ontologies: the first resulting from the existence of the physical world, including biological, and the other, resulting from the assessment of the existence of non-biological beings, focusing primarily on the artificial intelligence. Ontological origins is crucial here to a finally modal treatment of such phenomena as intelligence or consciousness. I’m going to describe these phenomena as arising from these two ontologically different substrates, but in some way being similar. The consequence of this expanded understanding of intelligence and consciousness shows that they are the feature, and not the property of human.
Czytaj więcej Następne

Aneta Niczyporuk

Rocznik Kognitywistyczny, Tom 10, 2017, s. 27-38

https://doi.org/10.4467/20843895RK.17.003.7783
The role of distraction and cognitive load in thought suppression
 
Despite general agreement that successful thought suppression depends on distraction and cognitive load, we do not know how exactly those factors affect mental control. This is due to terminological confusion, on the one hand, and some mutually incompatible experimental results, on the other. The present article is an attempt to specify the impact of distraction and cognitive control on the effectiveness of thought suppression. On the proposed account, distraction and cognitive load should be considered jointly because arguably every act of distraction produces some cognitive load. Two types of distraction are also distinguished: one engaging mainly the direct-access region postulated by Oberauer and the other involving cognitive control resources. Distraction of the former kind should improve thought suppression whereas distraction of the latter kind should inhibit it.
Czytaj więcej Następne

Mateusz Włodarczyk

Rocznik Kognitywistyczny, Tom 10, 2017, s. 39-55

https://doi.org/10.4467/20843895RK.17.004.7784
Presuppositions and reinforceability
 
This paper describes the experiment concerning reinforceability of conversational implicatures and presuppositions. In the field of pragmatics it is assumed that conversational implicatures can be reinforced while presuppositions cannot. Test subjects evaluated a set of statements containing implicatures and presuppositions which were presented in two versions: non-reinforced and reinforced. Results of the experiment suggest that not only implicatures but also statements that contain implicative verbs can be reinforced without sense of anomalous redundancy.
Czytaj więcej Następne