FAQ

“We can and we must”: The scientificity of trade-union history-writing in the Soviet Union in the 1920s

Data publikacji: 15.11.2019

Studia Historiae Scientiarum, 2019, 18 (2019), s. 219 - 254

https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.19.008.11014

Autorzy

Roman Gilmintinov
Duke University. Durham, NC 27708, Stany Zjednoczone
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6107-5928 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Tytuły

"We can and we must": The scientificitiy of trade-union history-writing in the Soviet Union in the 1920s

Abstrakt

In the 1920s, the young Soviet Republic, rejecting the old social system, turned to the study of the past. Instead of engaging with professional historians, the new regime initiated a whole range of large-scale participatory projects incorporated into political and public institutions to produce new, revolutionary history. In this article, instead of approaching this topic in terms of ideology and memory I put it in the context of history of science. Focusing on the case of trade unions, I suggest considering the early Soviet non-academic history-writing as a form of radical citizen science. Even though trade unionists had no special education, they dared to use scientific methods in their research that ended with positive results. This story allows us to question the opposition between amateurs and professionals in the field of citizen science.

„Możemy i musimy”: Naukowość pisarstwa historycznego o związkach zawodowych w Związku Radzieckim w latach 20. XX wieku

Abstrakt

W latach 20. XX wieku młoda Republika Radziecka odrzuciwszy stary układ społeczny zwróciła się ku badaniom przeszłości. Zamiast współpracować z profesjonalnymi historykami, nowy reżim zapoczątkował całą gamę dużych projektów partycypacyjnych pod kontrolą instytucji politycznych i publicznych, których celem było stworzenia nowej, rewolucyjnej historii. W tym artykule zamiast podchodzić do tego tematu w kategoriach ideologii i pamięci, umieściłem go w kontekście historii nauki. Skupiając się na przypadku związków zawodowych, sugeruję rozważenie wczesnego sowieckiego, nieakademickiego pisarstwa historycznego jako formie radykalnej nauki obywatelskiej. Mimo że związkowcy nie mieli kierunkowego wykształcenia, odważyli się wykorzystać metodę naukową w swoich badaniach zwieńczonych pozytywnymi rezultatami. Przykład ten pozwala nam kwestionować opozycję między amatorami i profesjonalistami w dziedzinie nauki obywatelskiej.

Bibliografia

ARCHIVE SOURCES

The Central State Archive of St. Petersburg, fond 6276 Leningradskii Oblastnoi Sovet Professional’nykh Soiuzov.

The State Archive of the Russian Federation, fond 6935 Komissiia po Izucheniiu Istorii Professional’nogo Dvizhenia pri Vsesoiuznom Tsentral’nom Sovete Professional’nykh Soiuzov.

 

STUDIES

Alatortseva, Аlevtina 1989: Sovetskaia Istoricheskaia Periodika, 1917 – seredina 1930-kh godov. Moskva: Nauka.

Alekseeva, Galina 1968: Oktiabr’skaia Revoliutsiia i Istoricheskaia Nauka v Rossii. (1917–1923 gg.). Moskva: Nauka.

Aronova, Elena 2017: Citizen Seismology, Stalinist Science, and Vladimir Mannar’s Cold Wars. Science, Technology, & Human Values 42(2), pp. 226–56. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0162243916687643 (purchase PDF).

Barber, John 1979: The Establishment of Intellectual Orthodoxy in the USSR 1928-1934. Past and Present 83, pp. 141–164. Available online:http://www.jstor.org/stable/650604 (purchase PDF).

Beer, Daniel 2008: Renovating Russia: The Human Sciences and the Fate of Liberal Modernity, 1880–1930. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Belozerov, Alexandr 1923: Opyt Istorii Nizhegorodskikh Professional’nykh Soiuzov. [In:] Rabochee i Professional’noe Dvizhenie v Nizhegorodskom Krae: 1869–1917. Materialy. N.-Novgorod: Nizhegorod. gub. sov. prof. soiuzov, pp. 7–263.

Bloch, Marc 1992(1941):The Historian’s Craft. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre 1975: The Specificity of the Scientific Field and the Social Conditions of the Progress of Reason. Social Science Information 14 (December), pp. 19–47. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847501400602 (purchase PDF).

Brandenberger, David 2002: National Bolshevism: Stalinist Mass Culture and the Formation of Modern Russian National Identity, 1931–1956. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bulkin, Fedor 1924: Na Zare Profdvizheniia: Istoriia Peterb. Soiuza Metallistov: 1906–1914. Moskva: Tsentr. Kom. Vseros. Soiuza Rabochikh Metallistov.

Bystrianskii, Vadim 1925: Lenin-Istorik: Istorizm v Leninizme. Leningrad: Gos. izd.

Chekin, A. (Iarotskii, Vasilii) 1924: Zadachi Izucheniia Rossiiskogo Professional’nogo Dvizheniia. In: Materialy po Istorii Professional’nogo Dvizheniia v Rossii, Vol. 1. Moskva: VTsSPS, pp. 7–16.

Corney, Frederick C. (ed.) 2015: Trotsky’s Challenge: The “Literary Discussion” of 1924 and the Fight for the Bolshevik Revolution. Boston: Brill.

Corney, Frederick C. 2004: Telling October: Memory and the Making of the Bolshevik Revolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

David-Fox, Michael 1997: Revolution of the Mind: Higher Learning among the Bolsheviks, 1918–1929. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Dolgova, Evgeniia 2013: Spory o Metode v Rossiiskoi Istoricheskoi Nauke v 1920-e gody. Vestnik RGGU. Seriia: Politologiia. Istoriia. Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniia 1 (102), pp. 166–172. Available online: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/spory-o-metode-v-rossiyskoy-istoricheskoy-nauke-v-1920-e-gody-1.

Dolgova, Evgeniia 2017: “Proektnaia Nauka”: Uchenye i Mekhanizm Gosudarstvennoi Podderzhki Nauchnykh Initsiativ v Postrevoliutsionnye Gody. In: L.N. Mazur (ed.), Epokha Sotsialisticheskoi Rekonstruktsii: Idei, Mify i Programmy Sotsial’nykh Preobrazovanii. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural’skogo Universiteta, pp. 405–416.

Dolgova, Evgeniia 2018: OBiografii Odnogo Stalinskogo Upravlentsa: Efim Abramovich Mil’shtein. Noveishaia Istoriia Rossii 8 (4), pp. 912–924. Available online: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/15284/1/08-Dolgova.pdf.

Dmitriev, Aleksandr 2015: Vvedenie. [In:] Aleksandr Dmitriev, Irina Savelieva(eds.), Nauki o Cheloveke: Istoria Distsiplin. Moskva: Izd. Dom Vysshei Shkoly Ekonomiki, pp. 7–39.

Dobrenko, Evgeny 2008: Stalinist Cinema and the Production of History: Museum of the Revolution. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

Engels, Frederick 1987 (1877): Anti-Dühring. Herr Eugen Dühring’s Revolution in Science. In: Karl Marx and Frederick Engels: Collected Works. Vol. 25. Moscow: Progress Publishers, pp. 5–298.

Engels, Frederick 1989 (1880): Socialism: Utopian and Scientific. [In:] Karl Marx and Frederick Engels:Collected Works. Vol. 24. Moscow: Progress Publishers, pp. 281–326.

Engelstein, Laura 1994: The Keys to Happiness: Sex and the Search for Modernity in Fin-de-Siecle Russia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Enteen, George M. 1976: Marxists versus Non-Marxists: Soviet Historiography in the 1920s. Slavic Review 35(1), pp. 91–110.Available online: https://doi.org/10.2307/2494822 (purchase PDF).

Enteen, George M. 1986: Writing Party History in the USSR: The Case of E.M. Iaroslavskii. Journal of Contemporary History 21(2), pp. 321–44. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/260368 (purchase PDF).

Fediukin, Sergei 1965: Sovetskaia Vlast’ i Burzhuaznye Spetsialisty. Moskva: Mysl’.

Frankel, Jonathan 1966: Party Genealogy and the Soviet Historians (1920–1938). Slavic Review 25(4), pp. 563–603. Available online: https://doi.org/10.2307/2492821 (purchase PDF).

Gilmintinov, Roman 2015: Partiinoe Istoriopisanie i Pole Nauki: Opyt Zhurnala “Krasnaia Letopis’” v 1922-23 godakh. In: Gyula Szvák (ed.) Al’ternativy, Perelomnye Punkty, i Smeny Rezhima v Istorii Rossii. Materialy Pervoi Mezhdunarodnoi Konferentsii Molodykh Rusistov Budapeshtskogo Tsentra Rusistiki ot 19-20 Maia 2014 g. Budapesht: Russica Pannonicana, pp. 287-297.

Gruzdev, S. 1926: Iz Istorii Prof. Dvizheniia 1905 g. v Peterburge. [In:] Materialy po Istorii Prof. Dvizheniia v Peterburge za 1905–1907 gg. Leningrad: Izd-vo Leningr. Gubprofsoveta, pp. 29–58.

Gruzdinskaia, Viktoriia; Metel’ Ol’ga 2018: Institut Krasnoi Professury: Problemy Institutsional’nogo Stroitel’stva (1921–1923 gg.). Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta426, pp. 82–87. Available online: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/institut-krasnoy-professury-problemy-institutsionalnogo-stroitelstva-1921-1923-gg.

Hartzok, Justus Grant 2009: Children of Chapaev: The Russian Civil War Cult and the Creation of Soviet Identity, 1918–1941. Ph.D. dis., Univ. of Iowa.

Hirsch, Francine2005:Empire of nations: Ethnographic knowledge and the making of the Soviet Union. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Hobsbawm, Eric 1983: Introduction: Inventing Traditions. [In:] Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger (eds.), The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–15.

Holmes, Larry E.; Burgess, William 1982: Scholarly Voice or Political Echo? Soviet Party History in the 1920s. Russian History 9(1), pp. 378–98.Available online: https://doi.org/10.1163/187633182X00218 (purchase PDF).

Holquist, Peter 2001: To count, to extract, and to exterminate: population statistics and population politics in late imperial and soviet Russia. In: Ronald G. Suny and Terry Martin (eds.), A State of Nations: Empire and Nation-making in the Age of Lenin and Stalin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 111–145.

Holquist, Peter 2010:’In Accord with State Interests and the People’s Wishes’: The Technocratic Ideology of Imperial Russia’s Resettlement Administration. SlavicReview 1(69), pp. 151–179. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0037677900016739 (purchase PDF).

Iakub, R. 1924: K voprosu ob “istokakh” professional’nogo dvizheniia v Rossii. [In:] Materialy po Istorii Professional’nogo Dvizheniia v Rossii, Vol. 2. Moskva: VTsSPS, pp. 51–74.

Iarotskii, Vasilii 1924: Tezisy Doklada. [In:] Materialy po Istorii Professional’nogo Dvizheniia v Rossii, Vol. 2. Moskva: VTsSPS, pp. 3–7.

Iasnitskii, A. 2015: Distsiplinarnoe Stanovlenie Russkoi Psikhologii PErvoi Poloviny XX veka.[In:] Aleksandr Dmitriev and Irina Savelieva (eds.), Nauki o Cheloveke: Istoria Distsiplin. Moskva: Izd. Dom Vysshei Shkoly Ekonomiki, pp. 214–226.

Iasnitskii, A.; Zavershneva E. 2009: Ob Arkhetipe Sovetskoi Psikhologii kak Nauchnoi Distcipliny i Sotsial’noi Praktiki. Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie 100, pp. 334–355. Availableonline: http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2009/100/ai26.html.

Ivanova, Liudmila1968: UIstokovSovetskoiIstoricheskoiNauki: (Podgotovka KadrovIstorikov-Marksistov1917–1929 gg.).Moskva: Mysl’.

Joravsky, David 2013: Soviet Marxism and Natural Science, 1917-1932. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge.

Klushin, Vladimir 1971: Pervye Uchenye-Marksisty Petrograda. Leningrad: Lenizdat.

Kojevnikov, Alexei 2002: The Great War, the Russian Civil War, and the Invention of Big Science. Science in Context 15, no. 02, pp. 239–275.

Kojevnikov, Alexei 2008: The Phenomenon of Soviet Science. Osiris 23(1), pp. 115–135.

Kotkin, Stephen 1995: Magnetic Mountain: Stalinism as a Civilization, Reprint edition. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Krementsov, Nikolai 2011: From “Beastly Philosophy” to Medical Genetics: Eugenics in Russia and the Soviet Union, Annals of Science 68, pp. 61–92.

Lelevich, Georgii 1925: Lenin, kak Istorik Partii i Revoliutsii. Moskva: Gos. izd.

Maksakov, Vladimir 1959: Аrkhivnoe Delo v Pervye Gody Sovetskoi Vlasti. Moskva: B. I.

Metel’, Ol’ga 2017: Sotsialisticheskaia Akadedemiia Obshchestvennykh Nauk: Ocherk Istorii (1918–1919 gg.). Vestnik Omskogo Universiteta. Seriia “Istoricheskie Nauki”. 1, pp. 184–191. Available online: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsialisticheskaya-akademiya-obschestvennyh-nauk-ocherk-istorii-1918-1919-gg.

Miliukov, Pavel 1921: Istoriia Vtoroi Russkoi Revoliutsii. T. 1, Vyp. 1.Protivorechiia Revoliutsii. Sofiia: Pridvornaia Tipografiia.

Milonov, Iurii 1924: Osnovnye Problemy Istoriografii Professional’nogo Dvizheniia v Rossii. [In:] Materialy po Istorii Professional’nogo Dvizheniia v Rossii, Vol. 1. Moskva: VTsSPS, pp. 16–24.

Milonov, Iurii; Rakovskii, M 1928 Istoriia Moskovskogo Professional’nogo Soiuza Rabochikh Derevoobdelochnikov. Vyp. 1. Ot Pervykh Stachek (90-e gody) do Razgroma Soiuza (1907 god). Moskva: MGO Derevoobdelochnikov.

Mogil’ner, M. B. 2008: Homo Imperii: Istoriia Fizicheskoi Antropologii v Rossii (konets XIX – nachalo XX v.). Moskva: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie.

[N.N.1] 1921: Piataia Vserossiiskaia Konferentsiia Professional’nykh Soiuzov, 3–7 Noiabria 1920 g.: Stenograficheskii Otchet. Moskva: VTsSPS.

[N.N.2] 1924a: Ot Redaktsii. In: Materialy po Istorii Professional’nogo Dvizheniia v Rossii, Vol. 1. Moskva: VTsSPS, pp. 3–7.

[N.N.3] 1924b: Stenogramma Diskussionnykh Sobranii, Ustroennykh Istprofom VTsSPS 14 i 28 Fevralia 1924 g. [In:] Materialy po Istorii Professional’nogo Dvizheniia v Rossii, Vol. 2. Moskva: VTsSPS, pp. 7–51.

[N.N.4] 1930: Mirovoe Revoliutsionnoe Profdvizhenie ot IV do V Kongressa Profinterna 1928–1930. Moskva: Izd-vo VTsSPS.

[N.N.5] 1932: Za Marksistsko-Leninskuiu Istoriiu Profdvizheniia. Doklad E. Mil’shteina i Preniia po Dokladu. Moskva: Porfizdat.

Narskii, Igor’ 2004: Konstruirovanie Mifa o Grazhdanskoi Voine i Osobennosti Kollektivnogo Zabyvaniia na Urale v 1917–1922 gg. Ab Imperio 2, pp. 211–236.Available online: http://muse.jhu.edu/article/560049 (purchase PDF).

Nosach, V.I.; Zvereva N.D. 2009: Stalinizm i Razgrom Avangarda Profsoiuzov. Moskva: FNPR.

Novick, Peter 1988: That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Osipov, E. (Shatan) 1925: Gornorabochie i Gornopromyshlenniki v 1917 godu. [In:] Materialy po Istorii Professional’nogo Dvizheniia v Rossii, Vol. 4. Moskva: VTsSPS, pp. 389–418.

Perchenok, F.F. (1995): “Delo Akaemii Nauk” i “Velikii Perelom” v Sovetskoi Nauke. [In:] Tragicheskie Sud’by: Repressirovannye Uchenye Akademii Nauk SSSR. Moskva: Nauka, pp. 201–235.

Platt, Kevin M. F.; Brandenberger, David 1999: Terribly Romantic, Terribly Progressive or Terribly Tragic: Rehabilitating Ivan IV under I.V. Stalin. The Russian Review 58(4), pp. 635–654. Available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0036-0341.00098 (purchase PDF).

Platt, Kevin M. F.; Brandenberger, David (eds.) 2006: Epic Revisionism: Russian History and Literature as Stalinist Propaganda. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Pokrovskii, Mikhail 2012(1933)a: Istoricheskaia Nauka i Bor’ba Klassov: Istoriograficheskie Ocherki, Kriticheskie Stat’i i Zametki, Vol. 1. Moskva: URSS LIBROKOM.

Pokrovskii, Mikhail 2012(1933)b: Istoricheskaia Nauka i Bor’ba Klassov: Istoriograficheskie Ocherki, Kriticheskie Stat’ i Zametki, Vol. 2. Moskva: URSS LIBROKOM.

Ringer, Fritz K. 1990 (1969): The Decline of the German Mandarins: The German Academic Community, 1890–1933. Hanover: University Press of New England.

Sergeev, А. 1935: K Voprosu o Vyrabotke Pravil Izdaniia Dokumentov TSАU SSSR. Аrkhivnoe Delo 1 (34), pp. 55–77.

Tarle, Evgenii 1921: Istoriia Truda i ego Znachenie. Аrkhiv Istorii Truda v Rossii 1, pp. 6–10.

Tikhonov, Vitalii 2016: Ideologicheskie Kampanii “Pozdnego Stalinizma” i Sovetskaia Istoricheskaia Nauka (seredina 1940-kh – 1953 g.). Moskva, Sankt-Peterburg: Nestor-Istoriia.

Tolz, Vera 2011: Russia’s own Orient: the politics of identity and Oriental Studies in the Late Imperial and Early Soviet Periods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Valk, Sigizmund 1926: O Priemakh Izdaniia Istoriko-Revoliutsionnykh Dokumentov. [In:] Protokoly Pervogo S’ezda Arkhivnykh Deiatelei RSFSR 14–19 Marta 1925 g. Moskva, Leningrad: Izd-vo Tsentrarkhiva RSFSR i Gos. izd-vo, pp. 274–275.

Valk, Sigizmund 1991: Novyi Proekt Pravil Izdaniia Dokumentov. [In:] Sigizmund Valk, Izbrannye Trudy po Arkheografii. Nauchnoe Nasledie. Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka, pp. 116–131.

White, James D. 1985: Early Soviet Historical Interpretations of the Russian Revolution 1918–24. Europe-Asia Studies 37(3), pp. 330–352. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668138508411589 (purchase PDF).

Zelenov, Mikhail 2000: Аpparat TsK RKP(b)-VKP(b), Tsenzura i Istoricheskaia Nauka v 1920-e gody. Novgorod: Nizhpoligraf.

Informacje

Informacje: Studia Historiae Scientiarum, 2019, 18 (2019), s. 219 - 254

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

"We can and we must": The scientificitiy of trade-union history-writing in the Soviet Union in the 1920s

Angielski:

“We can and we must”: The scientificity of trade-union history-writing in the Soviet Union in the 1920s

Autorzy

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6107-5928

Roman Gilmintinov
Duke University. Durham, NC 27708, Stany Zjednoczone
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6107-5928 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Duke University. Durham, NC 27708, Stany Zjednoczone

Publikacja: 15.11.2019

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND  ikona licencji

Udział procentowy autorów:

Roman Gilmintinov (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski