Reductionism Debate in Molecular Biology: Max Delbrück’s Complementarity Approach

Vito Balorda

Tytuły

Abstrakt

In this paper, I address Max Delbrück’s conceptual and experimental importance for molecular biology (henceforth MB) origins. In particular, his complementarity approach and its anti-reductive implications on the (epistemic) reductionism debate in MB.

Regarding Delbrück’s conceptual and experimental importance, I examine his influence on the development of MB by exploring a shift of his interests from physics to biology. Particularly, I outline his central role in “The Phage Group”, the informal group of scientists examining the origin of hereditary life using bacteriophages as their experimental model of choice. Delbrück and “The Phage Group” greatly influenced the development of MB, which culminated with the shared 1969 Nobel Prize for the discoveries regarding replication mechanism and genetic structure of viruses.

Moreover, I examine Delbrück’s complementarity approach towards biological explanations. The complementarity in biology assumes that “biological phenomena might require the employment of descriptions that are mutually exclusive yet jointly necessary for understanding life processes” (McKaughan 2011, p. 11). I explore Delbrück’s complementarity approach, in particular the debate between the reductive and anti-reductive interpretations of it. I argue for the latter interpretation by suggesting that Delbrück advanced an anti-reductive view towards biological explanations by advocating for independent status of explanations of various biological disciplines. Furthermore, I address the complementarity approach in the light of the anti-reductive interpretation in the recent developments in MB, particularly, the potentiality of finding the complementarity approach in systems biology, epigenetics, and boundary selection.

In this paper, I address Max Delbrück’s conceptual and experimental importance for molecular biology (henceforth MB) origins. In particular, his complementarity approach and its anti-reductive implications on the (epistemic) reductionism debate in MB.

Regarding Delbrück’s conceptual and experimental importance, I examine his influence on the development of MB by exploring a shift of his interests from physics to biology. Particularly, I outline his central role in “The Phage Group”, the informal group of scientists examining the origin of hereditary life using bacteriophages as their experimental model of choice. Delbrück and “The Phage Group” greatly influenced the development of MB, which culminated with the shared 1969 Nobel Prize for the discoveries regarding replication mechanism and genetic structure of viruses.

Moreover, I examine Delbrück’s complementarity approach towards biological explanations. The complementarity in biology assumes that “biological phenomena might require the employment of descriptions that are mutually exclusive yet jointly necessary for understanding life processes” (McKaughan 2011, p. 11). I explore Delbrück’s complementarity approach, in particular the debate between the reductive and anti-reductive interpretations of it. I argue for the latter interpretation by suggesting that Delbrück advanced an anti-reductive view towards biological explanations by advocating for independent status of explanations of various biological disciplines. Furthermore, I address the complementarity approach in the light of the anti-reductive interpretation in the recent developments in MB, particularly, the potentiality of finding the complementarity approach in systems biology, epigenetics, and boundary selection.

Słowa kluczowe

anti-reduction, explanation, molecular biology, Max Delbrück, complementarity approach

Bibliografia

Bala, Arun 2017: Complementarity Beyond Physics: Niels Bohr’s Parallels. Palgrave Macmillan.

Bechtel, William; Richardson, Robert 2010: Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Bohr, Niels 1933: Light and Life. Nature 131, pp. 421–423, 457–459. DOI: 10.1038/131457a0.

Brigandt, Ingo; Love, Alan 2022: Reductionism in Biology, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/reduction-biology/.

Darden, Lindley 2005: Relations Among Fields: Mendelian, Cytological and Molecular Mechanisms. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36, pp. 349–371. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2005.03.007.

Delbrück, Max 1949: A Physicist Looks at Biology. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences 38, pp. 173–190. URL: https://faculty.washington.edu/lynnhank/Delbruck.pdf (accessed on 15 November 2022)

Domondon, T. Andrew 2006: Bringing Physics to Bear on the Phenomenon of Life: The Divergent Positions of Bohr, Delbrück, and Schrödinger. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37, pp. 433–458. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2006.06.014.

Dupre’, John 2021: The Metaphysics of Biology. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781009024297.

Fischer, Ernst. P.; Lipson, Carol 1988: Thinking about Science. Max Delbrück and the Origins of Molecular Biology. New York: Norton. DOI: 10.1126/science242.4886.1711.

Fox Keller, Evelyn 1990: Physics and the Emergence of Molecular Biology: A History of Cognitive and Political Synergy. Journal of the History of Biology 23(3), pp. 389–409. DOI: 10.1007/BF00136376.

Harding, Carolyn 1978: Delbrück, Max, interview by Carolyn Harding. Pasadena, California, July 14–September 11, 1978. Oral History Project, California Institute of Technology Archives. URL: https://oralhistories.library.caltech.edu/16/1/OH_Delbruck_M.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2022).

Hausmann, Rudolf 2002: To Grasp the Essence of Life: A History of Molecular Biology. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-3540-7.

Hull, David 1976: Informal Aspects of Theory Reduction. [In:] R.S. Cohen and A. Michalos (eds.), Proceedings of the 1974 Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 653–670. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-1449-6.

Keiser, Marie, I. 2011: Limits of Reductionism in the Life Sciences. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 33, pp. 453–476. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23335178.

Kitcher, Philip 1984: 1953 and All That: A Tale of Two Sciences. Philosophical Review 93, pp. 335–373. DOI: 10.2307/2184541.

Kornberg, Arthur 1987: The Two Cultures: Chemistry and Biology. Biochemistry 26, pp. 6888–6891. DOI: 10.1021/bi00396a002.

Mazzocchi, Fulvio 2010: Complementarity in Biology. EMBO reports 11, pp. 339–344. DOI: 10.1038/embor.2010.56.

Mazzocchi, Fulvio 2012: Complexity and the Reductionism-Holism Debate in Systems Biology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Systems Biology and Medicine 4(5), pp. 413–427. DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1181.

McKaughan, Daniel, J. 2005: The Influence of Niels Bohr on Max Delbrück: Revisiting the Hopes Inspired by “Light and Life”. Isis 96(4), pp. 507–529. DOI: 10.1086/498591.

McKaughan, Daniel J. 2011: Was Delbrück a Reductionist? In Sloan, P. and Fogel, B., eds. Creating a Physical Biology: The Three-Man Paper and Early Molecular Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/22977953-06902016.

O’Malley, Maureen, A.; Dupre’, John 2005: Fundamental Issues in Systems Biology. BioEssays 27, pp. 1270–1276. DOI: 10.1002/bies.20323.

Plotnitsky, Arkady 2013: Niels Bohr and Complementarity: An Introduction. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4517-3.

Roll-Hansen, Nils 2000: The Application of Complementarity to Biology: From Niels Bohr to Max Delbrück. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 30(2), pp. 417–442. DOI: 10.2307/27757838.

Roll-Hansen, Nils 2011: Niels Bohr and Max Delbrück: Balancing Autonomy and Reductionism in Biology. [In:] Sloan, P. and Fogel, B., eds. Creating a Physical Biology: The Three-Man Paper and Early Molecular Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.2307/27757838.

Rosenberg, Alex 1997: Reductionism Redux: Computing the Embryo. Biology and Philosophy 12, pp. 445–470. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006574719901.

Rosenfeld, Leon 1961: Foundations of Quantum Theory and Complementarity. Nature 190, pp. 384–388. DOI: 10.1038/190384a0.

Sarkar, Sahotra 1992: Models of Reduction and Categories of Reductionism. In: S. Sarkar (ed.). 2005. Molecular Models of Life. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Schaffner, Kenneth, F. 1993: Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Schaffner, Kenneth, F. 2002: Reductionism, Complexity and Molecular Medicine: Genetic Chips and the ‘Globalization’ of the Genome. In Regenmortel M., Hull D. (eds.), Promises and Limits of Reductionism in the Biomedical Sciences, 323–351. Chichester, UK: Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/0470854189.

Strauss, Bernard, S. 2017: A Physicist’s Quest in Biology: Max Delbrück and “Complementarity”. Genetics 206, pp. 641–650. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.117.201517.

Strohman, Richard 1997: The Coming Kuhnian Revolution in Biology. Nat Biotech 15: 194–200. DOI: 10.1038/nbt0397-194.

Summers, William, C. 1993: How Bacteriophage Came to Be Used by the Phage Group. Journal of the History of Biology 26(2), pp. 255–267. DOI: 10.1007/BF01061969.

Tabery, James; Piotrowska, Monika; Darden, Lindley 2021: Molecular Biology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/molecular-biology/.

Theise, Neil D.; Kafatos, Menas C. 2013: Complementarity in Biological Systems: A Complexity Views. Wiley Periodicals 18(6), 11-20. DOI: 10.1002/cplx.21453.

Theise, Neil, D.; Krause, Diane 2002: Toward a New Paradigm of Cell Differentiation Capacity. Leukemia 16, pp. 542–548.

Waters, Kenneth, C. 1990: Why the Anti-Reductionist Consensus Won’t Survive: the Case of Classical Mendelian Genetics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 125–139.

Wimsatt, William C. 1976: Reductive Explanation: a Functional Account, in R.S. Cohen and A. Michalos (eds.), Proceedings of the 1974 Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 671–710.

Informacje

Informacje: Studia Historiae Scientiarum, 2023, 22 (2023), s. 587 - 610

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.23.016.17707

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

Reductionism Debate in Molecular Biology: Max Delbrück’s Complementarity Approach

Angielski:

Reductionism Debate in Molecular Biology: Max Delbrück’s Complementarity Approach

Autorzy

Vito Balorda

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7928-7088

University of Rijeka
Chorwacja

Publikacja: 05.10.2023

Status artykułu: Otwarte

Licencja: CC BY

Udział procentowy autorów:

Vito Balorda (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski

Liczba wyświetleń: 177

Liczba pobrań: 183

<p> Reductionism Debate in Molecular Biology: Max Delbrück’s Complementarity Approach</p>

Pobierz pełny tekst

Tytuły

Abstrakt

Słowa kluczowe

Bibliografia

Informacje

Autorzy