Warunki teoretyczne dla zmiany w systemie oceniania studentów: dążąc do dobrych praktyk
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEData publikacji: 31.12.2020
Labor et Educatio, 2020, 8 (2020), s. 73-93
https://doi.org/10.4467/25439561LE.20.001.12992Autorzy
Theoretical Preconditions for [a] Change in the Student Assessment System: Toward Good Practices
Student formal assessment is the core axis of the educational process that affects the whole teaching / learning activity, its quality, students’ success experience, their self-respect and self-esteem, and the perception of self-efficacy. By recognising prospects as the main learning objective and defining the outcome as personal and authentic learner progress, the assessment raises the need to pay a due attention to reflection, deep consideration, and feedback to all participants of the educational process. Against this background, doubts are started to be raised about appropriateness of the grade, currently being one of the most popular methods of the formal student assessment, leading to the scientific problem of this article. Over the last few decades, a shift in the assessment has been observed, from the focus exclusively on the end result to a stronger orientation toward the whole educational process, with an emphasis on motivating students to learn and strengthening their involvement in the educational process. These changes are illustrated by the Finnish good practice where, in an environment based on mutual trust and respect, and without questioning the importance and need for testing learners’ knowledge, abilities, and skills in the teaching / learning process, alternative assessment methods: portfolio assessment and learning conversations, are successfully used. To transfer examples of the good practice and adapt them to the national context, it seems reasonable to apply theories and models of change management. Achieving a targeted and effective change in the area of the assessment requires a process-focused approach to the change management.
Alotaibi, K. A. (2018). Teachers’ Perceptions on Factors Influence Adoption of Formative Assessment. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(1), pp. 74–86. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v8n1p74
Alvarado, M., & Vargas, J. (2019). What It Takes to Increase Student Success through Systems Change: Lessons from the Linked Learning Regional Hubs of Excellence. Jobs for the Future. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED594034.pdf
Amonashvili, P. S. (2016). On the features of the humane educational process. Psychology. Historical-critical Reviews and Current Researches, (4), pp. 204–214. Retrieved from http://publishing-vak.ru/file/archive-psycology-2016-4/19-amonishvili.pdf
Atjonen, P., Laivamaa, H., & kt. (2019). „So That We Know Where We Stand” Assessment of Learning And Competence in Basic Education and General Upper Secondary Education. Finnish Education Evaluation Centre (FINEEC). Retrieved from: https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/publications/so-that-we-know-where-we-stand-assessment-of-learning-and-compete-2
Barnes, M. (2018). No, Students Don’t Need Grades. Retrieved from: https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2018/01/10/no-students-dont-need-grades.html
Black, A. E., Deci, E. L. (2000). The Effects of Instructors’ Autonomy Support and Students’ Autonomous Motivation on Learning Organic Chemistry: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Science Education, 84, pp. 740–756. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3
Black, P. (2015). Formative Assessment – an Optimistic but Incomplete Vision. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22, pp. 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.999643
Blanco-Portela, N., Benayas, J., Pertierra, L. R., Lozano, R. (2017). Towards the Integration of Sustainability in Higher Education Institutions: A Review of Drivers of and Barriers to Organisational Change and Their Comparison Against those Found of Companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, pp. 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.252
Bloom, B. S. (1969). Some Theoretical Issues Relating to Educational Evaluation. In: R. W. Tyler (Ed.), Educational Evaluation: New Roles, New Means: the 68th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (part II), 68(2), pp. 26–50. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Boud, D. (2009). How can Practice Reshape Assessment?. Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education, 1–5. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8905-3_3
Boud, D. (2018). Assessment Could Demonstrate Learning Gains, but What is Required For It to Do So?. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), pp. 54–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2017.1413671
Bourke, R., O’Neill, J., & Loveridge, J. (2018). What Starts to Happen to Assessment when Teachers Learn About their Children’s Informal Learning?. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), pp. 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13 384-018-0259-x
Brookhart, S. M. (2019). A Perfect World Is One with No Grades. Retrieved from: http://www.ascd.org/ascd-express/vol14/num31/a-perfect-world-is-one-with-no-grades.aspx
Brown, G. T. L., Harris, L. R. (2014). The Future of Self-Assessment in classroom practice: Reframing Self-Assessment as a Core Competency. Frontline Learning Research, 2(1), pp. 22–30. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i1.24
Brown, S. (2005). Assessment for Learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, pp. 81–89. Retrieved from: http://eprints.glos.ac.uk/3607/1/LATHE
Burkšaitienė, N. (2016). Mokymo (-si) ir vertinimo aplanko taikymo universitetinėse studijose galimybės. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia, 13(13), pp. 87–98. https://doi.org/10.15388/ActPaed.2004.13.9638
Cheang, C., So, W., Zhan, Y., Tsoi, K. (2017). Education for Sustainability Using a Campus Eco-Garden as a Learning Environment. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 18(2).
Informacje: Labor et Educatio, 2020, 8 (2020), s. 73-93
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Šiauliai University, Šiauliai, Litwa
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Litwa
Šiauliai University, Šiauliai, Litwa
Lithuanian Academy of Music and Theatre, Wilno, Litwa
Publikacja: 31.12.2020
Otrzymano: 09.03.2020
Zaakceptowano: 10.09.2020
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 807
Liczba pobrań: 775