Dezinformacja na temat COVID-19 w mediach społecznościowych a kryzys epistemiczny. Przegląd problemów
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEData publikacji: 17.06.2024
Kwartalnik Historii Nauki i Techniki, 2024, Tom 69, Numer 2, s. 9 - 32
https://doi.org/10.4467/0023589XKHNT.24.013.19818Autorzy
Dezinformacja na temat COVID-19 w mediach społecznościowych a kryzys epistemiczny. Przegląd problemów
The text considers several critical issues related to the role of false information in the COVID-19 pandemic. It mainly focuses on social media, which often resemble echo chambers responsible for disseminating disinformation. In these echo chambers, users close themselves off from arguments and justifications different from their own, often with a strong tendency towards polarization of views and attitudes. A particular case of echo chambers is the conspiracy mentality propagated in social media, promoting conspirational beliefs about COVID-19, which, besides offering an alternative understanding of reality, deepens distrust towards epistemic authorities and methods of producing scientific knowledge. This indicates an epistemic crisis as a consequence of the pandemic, which must be addressed in order to rebuild and protect epistemic trust. The authors conclude that the consequence of this crisis is a regression of cognitive abilities, which may, in a feedback loop, exacerbate the epistemic crisis.
Bruns R., Hosangadi D., Trotochaud M., Sell T.K., COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation and Disinformation Costs an Estimated $50 to $300 Million Each Day, [s.l.] 2022.
Camargo C.Q., Simon F.M., The ‘Infodemic’ as a Cautionary Tale – Policy Implications of a Metaphor, s. 1–5, www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Expression/disinformation/3-Academics/Chico-Camargo-and-Felix-Simon.pdf [dostęp 20.05.2023].
The Disinformation Dozen: Why Platforms Must Act on Twelve Leading Online Anti-vaxxers, [s.l.] 2021.
Understanding the Infodemic and Misinformation in the Fight against COVID-19, [s.l.] 2021.
Polacy wobec epidemii koronawirusa, „Komunikat z badań” [CBOS] 2022, nr 141.
Rothkopf D.J., When the Buzz Bites Back, „Washington Post” 11.05.2003, www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/2003/05/11/when-the-buzz-bites-back/bc8cd84f-cab6-4648-bf58-0277261af6cd/ [dostęp 21.05.2023].
Raport otwarcia. 11. Aktualne wyzwania i zagrożenia dla polityki zdrowotnej w zakresie szczepień ochronnych w Polsce, medfake.pl/ebook/aktualne-wyzwania-i-zagrozenia-dla-polityki-zdrowotnej-w-zakresie-szczepien-ochronnych-w-polsce/ [dostęp 24.09.2023].
U.S. House of Representatives, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Misinformation, Conspiracy Theories, and ‘Infodemics’: Stopping the Spread Online, U.S. House Washington 2020, www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/111087/documents/HHRG-116-IG00-Transcript-20201015.pdf [dostęp 1.05.2023].
WHO Competency Framework. Building a Response Workforce to Manage Infodemics, [s.l.] 2021.
Adorno T.W., Sztuka i sztuki. Wybór esejów, tłum. K. Krzemień-Ojak, Warszawa 1990.
Allington D., Duffy B., Wessely S., Dhavan N., Rubin J., Health-Protective Behaviour, Social Media Usage and Conspiracy Belief during the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency, „Psychological Medicine” 2021, t. 51, nr 10, s. 1763–1769, DOI 10.1017/S003329172000224X.
Beck U., Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne, Frankfurt am Main 1986.
Bessi A., Coletto M., Davidescu G.A., Scala A., Caldarelli G., Quattrociocchi W., Science vs Conspiracy: Collective Narratives in the Age of Misinformation, „PLOS ONE” 2015, t. 10, nr 2, s. 1–17, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0118093.
Bourdieu P., The Forms of Capital, [w:] Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, red. J. Richardson, Westport 1986, s. 241–258.
Bradley F., Bangerter A., Bauer M., Conspiracy Theories as Quasi-religious Mentality: an Integrated Account from Cognitive Science, Social Representations Theory, and Frame Theory, „Frontiers in Psychology” 2013, t. 4, s. 1–12, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00424.
Burki T., The Online Anti-vaccine Movement in the Age of COVID-19, „The Lancet. Digital Health” 2020, t. 2, nr 10, s. 504–505, DOI 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30227-2.
Canela G., Claesson A., Pollack R., Addressing Mis- and Disinformation on Social Media, [w:] Managing Infodemics in the 21st Century. Addressing New Public Health Challenges in the Information Ecosystem, red. T.D. Purnat, T. Nguyen, S. Briand, Geneva 2023, s. 113–126, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-27789-4_9.
Cinelli M., Morales G.F., Galeazzi A., Quattrociocchi W., Starnini M., The Echo Chamber Effect on Social Media, „Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences” 2021, t. 118, nr 9, s. 1–8, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2023301118.
Czech F., Ścigaj P., Popularność narracji spiskowych w Polsce czasu pandemii COVID. Raport z reprezentatywnych badań sondażowych, Kraków 2020, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.27800.01288.
Desai A.N., Ruidera D., Steinbrink J.M., Granwehr B., Lee D.H., Misinformation and Disinformation: The Potential Disadvantages of Social Media in Infectious Disease and How to Combat Them, „Clinical Infectious Diseases” 2022, t. 74, nr 3, s. 34–39, DOI 10.1093/cid/ciac109.
Diaz R.C., Nilsson T., Disinformation and Echo Chambers: How Disinformation Circulates on Social Media Through Identity-Driven Controversies, „Journal of Public Policy & Marketing” 2023, t. 42, nr 1, s. 18–35, DOI 10.1177/07439156221103852.
Diethelm P., McKee M., Denialism: What Is It and How Should Scientists Respond?, „European Journal of Public Health” 2009, t. 19, nr 1, s. 2–4, DOI 10.1093/eurpub/ckn139.
Douglas K.M., Sutton R.M., Cichocka A., The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories, „Current, Directions in Psychological Science” 2017, t. 26, nr 6, s. 538–542, DOI 10.1177/0963721417718261.
Douglas K.M., Sutton R.M., What Are Conspiracy Theories? A Definitional Approach to Their Correlates, Consequences, and Communication, „Annual Review of Psychology” 2023, t. 74, nr 1, s. 271–298, DOI 10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-031329.
Dow B.J., Amber L., Wang J.C.S., Whitson J., Menon T., The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Search for Structure: Social Media and Conspiracy Theories, „Social and Personality Psychology Compass” 2021, t. 5, nr 9, s. 1–22, DOI 10.1111/spc3.12636.
Dynel M., Zappavigna M., Enacting Polyvocal Scorn in #CovidConspiracy Tweets: The Orchestration of Voices in Humorous Responses to COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories, „Discourse, Context & Media” 2023, t. 52, s. 1–10, DOI 10.1016/j.dcm.2023.100670.
Eysenbach G., How to Fight an Infodemic: The Four Pillars of Infodemic Management, „Journal of Medical Internet Research” 2020, t. 22, nr 6, e21820, DOI 10.2196/21820.
Eysenbach G., Infodemiology: The Epidemiology of (Mis)information, „The American Journal of Medicine” 2002, t. 113, nr 9, s. 763–765, DOI 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01473-0.
Farina M., Lavazza A., Lessons from Italy’s and Sweden’s Policies in Fighting COVID-19: The Contribution of Biomedical and Social Competences, „Frontiers in Public Health” 2020, t. 8, s. 1–6, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2020.563397.
Franks B., Bangerter A., Bauer M.W., Hall M., Noort M.C., Beyond ‘Monologicality’? Exploring Conspiracist Worldviews, „Frontiers in Psychology” 2017 t. 8, s. 1–16, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00861.
Freeman D., Waite F., Rosebrock L., Petit A., Causier C., East A., Lambe S., Coronavirus Conspiracy Beliefs, Mistrust, and Compliance with Government Guidelines in England, „Psychological Medicine” 2022, t. 52, nr 2, s. 251–263, DOI 10.1017/S0033291720001890.
Freiling I., Krause N.M., Scheufele D.A., Science and Ethics of “Curing” Misinformation, „AMA Journal of Ethics” 2023, t. 25, nr 3, s. 228–237, DOI 10.1001/amajethics.2023.228.
Garrett R.K., The ‘Echo Chamber’ Distraction: Disinformation Campaigns are the Problem, Not Audience Fragmentation, „Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition” 2017, t. 6, nr 4, s. 370–376, DOI 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.011.
Garry J., Ford R., Johns R., Coronavirus Conspiracy Beliefs, Mistrust, and Compliance: Taking Measurement Seriously, „Psychological Medicine” 2022, t. 52, nr 14, s. 3116–3126, DOI 10.1017/S0033291720005164.
Grycuk A., Fake newsy, trolle, boty i cyborgi w mediach społecznościowych, „Analizy BAS” 2021, nr 1, 152, s. 1–12.
Habermas J., Legitimation Crisis, tłum. T. McCarthy, Cambridge 1992.
Halford S.J., Conspiracy Movements: A Definitional Introduction and Theoretical Exploration of Organized Challenges to Epistemic Authority, „The Sociological Quarterly” 2023, t. 64, nr 2, s. 187–204, DOI 10.1080/00380253.2022.2060147.
Han B.C., Społeczeństwo transparencji, [w:] B.C. Han, Społeczeństwo zmęczenia i inne eseje, tłum. R. Pokrywka, Warszawa 2022, s. 91–144.
Harris K., Conspiracy Theories, Populism, and Epistemic Autonomy, „Journal of the American Philosophical Association” 2023, t. 9, nr 1, s. 21–36, DOI 10.1017/apa.2021.44.
Hendriks F., Kienhues D., Bromme R., Measuring Laypeople’s Trust in Experts in a Digital Age: The Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory (METI), „PLOS ONE” 2015, t. 10, nr 10, s. 1–20, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0139309.
Himelein-Wachowiak M., Giorgi S., Devoto A. i in., Bots and Misinformation Spread on Social Media: Implications for COVID-19, „Journal of Medical Internet Research” 2021, t. 23, nr 5, s. 1–11, DOI 10.2196/26933.
Hissa D., Araúio N., Infodemia na sociedade do desempenho: entre o mural panfletário e o panóptico digital, „Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada” 2021, t. 21, nr 4, s. 1011–1035, DOI 10.1590/1984-6398202117906.
Inoue M., Shimoura K., Nagai-Tanima M., Aoyama T., The Relationship Between Information Sources, Health Literacy, and COVID-19 Knowledge in the COVID-19 Infodemic: Cross-sectional Online Study in Japan, „Journal of Medical Internet Research” 2022, t. 24, nr 7, s. 1–13, DOI 10.2196/38332.
Islam M.S., Kamal A.H.M., Kabir A., Southern D.L., Khan S.H. i in., COVID-19 Vaccine Rumors and Conspiracy Theories: The Need for Cognitive Inoculation Against Misinformation to Improve Caccine Adherence, „PLOS ONE” 2021, t. 16, nr 5, s. 1–17, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0251605.
Koselleck R., Dzieje pojęć. Studia z semantyki i pragmatyki języka społeczno-politycznego, tłum. J. Marecki, W. Kunicki, Warszawa 2009.
Kozik E., Jak troszczyć się o życie? Antyszczepionkowe narracje spiskowe w czasie pandemii COVID-19, „Studia Etnologiczne i Antropologiczne” 2021, t. 21, nr 1, s. 1–19, DOI 10.31261/SEIA.2021.21.01.02.
Kurtulmus F., Irzik G., Justice in the Distribution of Knowledge, „Episteme” 2017, t. 14, nr 2, s. 129–146, DOI 10.1017/epi.2015.65.
Kurtulmuş F., Science, Trust and Justice: More Lessons from the Pandemic, „Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective” 2022, t. 11, nr 6, s. 11–17.
Laudan L., Epistemic Crises and Justification Rules, „Philosophical Topics” 2001, t. 29, nr 2, s. 271–317, DOI 10.5840/philtopics2001291/22.
Lawson M.A., Anand S., Kakkar H., Tribalism and Tribulations: The Social Costs of Not Sharing Fake News, „Journal of Experimental Psychology: General” 2023, t. 152, nr 3, s. 611–631, DOI 10.1037/xge0001374.
Levy N., Bad Beliefs. Why They Happen to Good People, Oxford 2022, DOI 10.1093/oso/9780192895325.001.0001.
Levy N., Echoes of Covid Misinformation, „Philosophical Psychology” 2021, t. 36, s. 1–18, DOI 10.1080/09515089.2021.2009452.
Lewandowsky S., Ecker U.K.H., Cook J., Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the ‘Post-Truth’ Era, „Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition” 2017, t. 6, nr 4, s. 353–369, DOI 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008.
Limaye R.J., Sauer M., Ali J., Bernstein J., Wahl B., Barnhill A., Labrique A., Building Trust While Influencing Online COVID-19 Content in the Social Media World, „Lancet Digital Health” 2020, t. 2, nr 6, s. 277–278, DOI 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30084-4.
MacIntyre A., Epistemological Crises, Dramatic Narrative and the Philosophy of Science, „The Monist” 1977, t. 60, nr 4, s. 453–472, DOI 10.5840/monist197760427.
Magarini F.M., Pinelli M., Sinisi A., Ferrari S., De Fazio G.L., Galeazzi G.M., Irrational Beliefs about COVID-19: A Scoping Review, „International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health” 2021, t. 18, nr 19, s. 1–21, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18199839.
Modgil S., Singh R.K., Gupta S. i in., A Confirmation Bias View on Social Media Induced Polarisation during Covid-19, „Information Systems Frontiers” 2021, s. 1–25, DOI 10.1007/s10796-021-10222-9.
Molden D.C., Higgins E.T., Motivated Thinking, [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, red. K.J. Holyoak, R.G. Morrison, Oxford 2012, s. 390–409, DOI 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0020.
Monaci S., The Pandemic of Conspiracies in the COVID-19 Age: How Twitter Reinforces Online Infodemic, „Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies” 2021, t. 11, nr 4, s. 1–11, DOI 10.30935/ojcmt/11203.
Morelock J., Narita F.Z., The Nexus of QAnon and COVID-19: Legitimation Crisis and Epistemic Crisis, „Critical Sociology” 2022, t. 48, nr 6, s. 1005–1024, DOI 10.1177/08969205211069614.
Murphy-Hollies K., Caporuscio C., What is Left of Irrationality?, „Philosophical Psychology” 2023, t. 36, nr 4, s. 808–818, DOI 10.1080/09515089.2023.2186220.
Nabożny A., Balcerzak B., Morzy M. i in., Improving Medical Experts’ Efficiency of Misinformation Detection: an Exploratory Study, „World Wide Web” 2023, t. 26, s. 773–798, DOI 10.1007/s11280-022-01084-5.
Neuberger C., Bartsch A., Fröhlich R., Hanitzsch T., Reinemann C., Schindler J., The Digital Transformation of Knowledge Order: a Model for the Analysis of the Epistemic Crisis, „Annals of the International Communication Association” 2023, t. 47, nr 2, s. 180–201, DOI 10.1080/23808985.2023.2169950.
Nguyen C., Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles, „Episteme” 2020, t. 17, nr 2, s. 141–161, DOI 10.1017/epi.2018.32.
Origgi G., Is Trust an Epistemological Notion?, „Episteme” 2004, t. 1, nr 1, s. 61–72, DOI 10.3366/epi.2004.1.1.61.
Özdemir V., Springer S., Decolonizing Knowledge Upstream: New Ways to Deconstruct and Fight Disinformation in an Era of COVID-19, Extreme Digital Transformation, and Climate Emergency, „OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology” 2022, t. 26, nr 5, s. 247–269, DOI 10.1089/omi.2022.0041.
Pierre J.M., Mistrust and Misinformation: A Two-Component, Socio-Epistemic Model of Belief in Conspiracy Theories, „Journal of Social and Political Psychology” 2020, t. 8, nr 2, s. 617–641, DOI 10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1362.
Poncela F.A.M., Infodemia: Rumores, Fake News, Mitos, „Sintaxis” 2020, r. 2, „Edición Especial COVID-19”, s. 35–55, DOI 10.36105/stx.2020edespcovid-19.02.
Posetti J., Bontcheva K., Disinfodemic. Deciphering COVID-19 disinformation Policy. Brief 1, [s.l.] 2021.
Prijić-Samaržija S., Isključuje li kritičko mišljenje povjerenje u epistemičke autoritete?, „Prolegomena” 2020, t. 19, nr 1, s. 5–26, DOI 10.26362/20200101.
Puri N., Coomes E.A., Haghbayan H., Gunaratne K., Social Media and Vaccine Hesitancy: New Updates for the Era of COVID-19 and Globalized Infectious Diseases, „Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics” 2020, t. 16, nr 11, s. 2586–2593, DOI 10.1080/21645515.2020.1780846.
Ranalli C., Malcom F., What’s so Bad about Echo Chambers?, „Inquiry” 2023, DOI 1-4310.1080/0020174x.2023.2174590 [w druku].
Romeo R.A., Théorie du complot, secret et transparence, „Rue Descartes” 2020, t. 2, nr 9, s. 81–102, DOI 10.3917/rdes.098.0081.
Rowell L., Call-Cummings M., Knowledge Democracy, Action Research, the Internet and the Epistemic Crisis, „Journal of Futures Studies” 2020, t. 24, nr 4, s. 73–82, DOI 10.6531/JFS.202006_24(4).0007.
Santos M.L.R., Paim M.C. i in., Ações governamentais para enfrentamento da crise de desinformação durante a pandemia da COVID-19, „Saúde Debate” 2021, t. 45, nr 2, s. 187–204, DOI 10.1590/0103-11042021E213.
Semino E., ‘Not Soldiers but Fire-fighters’ – Metaphors and Covid-19, „Health Communication” 2021, t. 36, nr 1, s. 50–58, DOI 10.1080/10410236.2020.1844989.
Simon F.M., Camargo C.Q., Autopsy of a Metaphor: The Origins, Use and Blind Spots of the ‘Infodemic’, „New Media & Society” 2021, nr 1, s. 1–22, DOI 10.1177/14614448211031908.
Soveri A., Karlsson L.C., Antfolk J. i in., Unwillingness to Engage in Behaviors that Protect Against COVID-19: the Role of Conspiracy Beliefs, Trust, and Endorsement of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, „BMC Public Health” 2021, t. 21, nr 684, s. 1–12, DOI 10.1186/s12889-021-10643-w.
Springer S., Özdemir V., Disinformation as COVID-19’s Twin Pandemic: False Equivalences, Entrenched Epistemologies, and Causes-of-Causes, „OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology” 2022, t. 26, nr 2, s. 82–87, DOI 10.1089/omi.2021.0220.
Špecián P., Epistemology and the Pandemic: Lessons from an Epistemic Crisis, „Social Epistemology” 2022, t. 36, nr 2, s. 167–179, DOI 10.1080/02691728.2021.2009931.
Steensen S., Journalism’s Epistemic Crisis and its Solution: Disinformation, Datafication and Source Criticism, „Journalism” 2019, t. 20, nr 1, s. 185–189, DOI 10.1177/1464884918809271.
Teovanović P., Zupan Z., Lukić P. i in., Irrational Beliefs Predict COVID-19 Related Health Behaviors. Irrational Beliefs Differentially Predict Adherence to Guidelines and Pseudoscientific Practices during the COVID-19 Pandemic, „Applied Cognitive Psychology” 2021, t. 35, nr 2, s. 486–496, DOI 10.1002/acp.3770.
Törnberg P., Echo Chambers and Viral Misinformation: Modeling Fake News as Complex Contagion, „PLOS ONE” 2018, t. 13, nr 9, s. 1–21, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0203958.
Valaskivi K., Robertson D.G., Introduction: Epistemic Contestations in the Hybrid Media Environment, „Popular Communication” 2022, t. 20, nr 3, s. 153–161, DOI 10.1080/15405702.2022.2057998.
Villa G., Pasi G., Viviani M., Echo Chamber Detection and Analysis, „Social Network Analysis and Mining” 2021, t. 11, nr 1, s. 1–17, DOI 10.1007/s13278-021-00779-3.
Wang Y., McKee M., Torbica A., Stuckler D., Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media, „Social Science & Medicine” 2019, t. 240, s. 1–12, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552.
Wesley M., Gradon K., COVID-19 Effects and Russian Disinformation, „Homeland Security Affairs” 2020, t. 16, nr 8, s. 1–27.
Informacje: Kwartalnik Historii Nauki i Techniki, 2024, Tom 69, Numer 2, s. 9 - 32
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Piastów Śląskich we Wrocławiu
Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Piastów Śląskich we Wrocławiu
Publikacja: 17.06.2024
Otrzymano: 11.06.2023
Zaakceptowano: 25.09.2023
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
PolskiLiczba wyświetleń: 301
Liczba pobrań: 156