A different kind of web. New connections between archives and our users, ed. K. Theimer, Chicago 2011.

Alberch Fugueras R., Los archivos, entre la memoria histórica y la sociedad del conocimiento, Barcelona 2003.

Bacia J., Unsere Geschichte gehört uns! Die Archive der Neuen Socialen Bewegungen, [in:] Logik und Lücke. Die Konstruktion des Authentischen in Archiven und Sammlungen, ed. M. Farrenkopf, A. Ludwig, A. Saupen, Göttingen 2021, pp. 272–274.

Bartlett N., Past imperfect (l’imparfait). Mediating meaning in archives of art, [in:] Archives,documentation, and institutions of social memory. Essays from the Sawyer Seminar, ed. F.X. Blouin and W.G. Rosenberg, University of Michigan Press 2006, pp. 121–133.

Blouin F.X., Rosenberg W.G., Processing the past. Contesting authority in history and the archives, Oxford 2011.

Bunn J., Frames and the future of archival processing, [in:] Archival futures, ed. C. Brown, London 2018, pp. 66–77.

Burton A., Archive stories. Facts, fictions, and the writing of history, Durham NC 2005.

Ciechanowski H., The principle of provenance as the principle of rationalization of archives, “Archiwa – Kancelarie – Zbiory” 2021, vol. 12, pp. 49–65.

Cook T., Evidence, memory, identity, and community. Four shifting archival paradigms, “Archival Science” 2013, vol. 13, pp. 95–120, repr., [in:] All shook up. The archival legacy of Terry Cook, ed. T. Nesmith, G. Bak and J.M. Schwartz, Chicago 2020, pp. 444–484.

Cook T., What is past is prologue. A history of archival since 1898, and the future paradigm shift, “Archivaria” 1997, vol. 43, pp. 17–63, repr., [in:] All shook up. The archival legacy of Terry Cook, ed. Tom Nesmith, G. Bak and J.M. Schwartz, Chicago 2020, pp. 227–274.

Ćwiek-Rogalska K., Archiving in the face of erasure. The idea of the “Post-German” archive, “Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne” 2020, vol. 19, pp. 77–100.

Deegan M., Sutherland K., Transferred illusions. Digital technology and the forms of print, Farnham– Burlington 2016.

Derrida J., Archive fever. A Freudian impression, The University of Chicago Press 1996.

Douglas J., Toward more honest description, “American Archivist” 2016, vol. 79, pp. 26–55.

Duff W.M., Harris V., Stories and names. Archival description as narrating records and constructing meanings, “Archival Science” 2002, vol. 2, pp. 263–285.

Evans J., McKemmish S., Daniels E., McCarthy G., Self-determination and archival autonomy. Advocating activism, “Archival Science” 2015, vol. 15, p. 337–368.

Farrenkopf M., Ludwig A., Saupe A., Logik und Lücke. Formen der archivischen und sammelnden Konstitution authentischen Wissens, [in:] Logik und Lücke. Die Konstruktion des Authentischen in Archiven und Sammlungen, ed. M. Farrenkopf, A. Ludwig, A. Saupe, Göttingen 2021, pp. 26–28.

Flinn A., Stevens M., Shepherd E., Whose memories, whose archives? Independent community archives, autonomy and the mainstream, “Archival Science” 2009, vol. 9, pp. 71–86.

Fritzsche P., The archive and the case of the German nation, [in:] Archive stories. Facts, fictions, and the writing of history, ed. A. Burton, Duke University Press 2006, pp. 184–208.

Füßl W., Überlieferungslücken, ihre Motive und Auswirkungen auf das kulturelle Erbe […], [in:] Logik und Lücke. Die Konstruktion des Authentischen in Archiven und Sammlungen, ed. M. Farrenkopf, A. Ludwig, A. Saupe, Göttingen 2021, pp. 153–159.

Galey A., The Shakespearean archive, Cambridge 2014.

Gallardo J.B., Ceci n’est pas une archive, https://revistafakta.wordpress.com/2013/12/17/ceci-nest-pas-une-archive-por-jorge-blasco-gallardo/ [originally published in: Memorias y olvidos del archivo, ed. F. Estévez González and N. de Santa Ana, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria 2010, pp. 11–19], accessed 1 June 2023.

Greene M., The power of meaning. The archival mission in the postmodern age, “American Archivist” 2002, vol. 65, pp. 42–55.

Harris. V., Ethics and the archive. “An incessant movement of recontextualisation” , [in:] Controlling the past. Documenting society and institutions. Essays in honor of Helen Willa Samuels, ed. T. Cook, Chicago 2011, p. 360.

Horsman P., Ketelaar E., Archival History, [in:] Encyclopedia of archival science, ed. L. Duranti and P.C. Franks, London 2015, pp. 53–58.

Ivacs G. The pervasiveness of archives, “LEA – Lingue e Letterature d’Oriente e d’Occidente” 2012, vol. 1/1, pp. 468–497.

Jeurgens C., The scent of the digital archive. Dilemmas with archive digitisation, “BMGN – Low Countries Historical Review” 2013, vol. 128, pp. 30–54, DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/bmgn-lchr.9348.

Jimerson R.C., Archives power. Memory, accountability, and social justice, Chicago 2009.

Ketelaar E., Archival temples, archival prisons. Modes of power and protection, “Archival Science” 2002, vol. 2, pp. 221–238.

Ketelaar, E., Archival turns and returns. Studies of the archive, [in:] Research in the archival multiverse, ed. A.J. Gilliland, S. McKemmish and A.J. Lau, Clayton 2016, pp. 228–268.

Ketelaar E., Archives as spaces of memory, “Journal of the Society of Archivists” 2008, vol. 29, pp. 9–27.

Ketelaar E., Archives, memories and identities, [in:] Archives and recordkeeping. Theory into practice, ed. C. Brown, London 2014, pp. 131–170.

Ketelaar, E., Archives, memories and identities, [in:] Records, archives and memory, ed. M. Willer, A.J. Gilliland, M. Tomič, Zadar 2015, pp. 47–76.

Ketelaar, E., Archiving people. A social history of Dutch archives, ‘s-Gravenhage 2020, pp. 19a, 275b: https://archivistics.home.blog/2019/12/14/new-e-book/, accessed 1 July 2023.

Ketelaar E., Being digital in people’s archives, “Archives and Manuscripts” 2003, vol. 31, pp. 8–22, translated into Polish: „Cyfrowe życie” w archiwum dla ludzi, “Archeion” 2004, vol. 107, pp. 149–160.

Ketelaar E., Cultivating archives, “Archival Science” 2012, vol. 12, pp. 19–33.

Ketelaar E., Documents as monuments, “Archeion” 2011, vol. 112, pp. 51–63; Polish translation: Dokumenty jako pomniki, “Archeion” 2011, vol. 112, pp. 37–47. Reprinted [in:] Culture – Memory – Identities. Memory of the World Program and diversified perception of the past. Papers of the 4th International Conference of the UNESCO Memory of the World Programme, Warsaw, Poland 18–21 May 2011, ed. W. Falkowski, Warszawa 2013, pp. 48–60.

Ketelaar E., Tacit narratives. The meanings of archives, “Archival Science” 2001, vol. 1, pp. 131–141.

Konarski K., Nowożytna archiwistyka polska i jej zadania, Warszawa 1929.

Konarski K., On the issues of modern Polish archival science, transl. and ed. B. Nowożycki, “American Archivist” 2017, vol. 80. pp. 213–229.

Lamb W.K., The fine art of destruction, [in:] Essays in memory of Sir Hilary Jenkinson, ed. A.E.J. Hollaender, Chichester 1962, pp. 50–56.

Lane V., Hill J., Where do we come from? What are we? Where are we going? Situating the archive and archivists, [in:] The future of archives and recordkeeping. A reader, ed. J. Hill, London 2011, pp. 3–22.

Langlois CH.V., Seignobos CH., Introduction to the study of history, London–New York 1912.

Mak B., Archaeology of a digitization, “Journal of the Association for information science and technology” 2014, vol. 65, pp. 1515–1526.

Mak B., How the page matters, Toronto 2011.

Matwijów M., Manuscript books. Collections of political life materials from the area of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania dating back to the 17th and 18th centuries in libraries, archives and museums in Poland, “Knygotyra” 2021, vol. 77, pp. 171–202.

Meehan J., Arrangement and description: between theory and practice, [in:] Archives and recordkeeping. Theory into practice, ed. C. Brown, London 2014, pp. 63–99.

Muller S., Feith J.A. and Fruin R., Manual for the arrangement and description of archives. Translation of the second edition by Arthur H. Leavitt, with a new introduction by Eric Ketelaar, Theo Thomassen and Peter Horsman, Chicago 2003.

Nesmith T., Seeing archives. Postmodernism and the changing intellectual place of archives, “American Archivist” 2002, vol. 65, p. 24–41.

Nowak L.P., Holenderski Podręcznik do porządkowania i opisu archiwów autorstwa S. Mullera, J. Feitha i R. Fruina z 1898 r. i jego późniejsze wydania, “Archiwa – Kancelarie – Zbiory” 2021, vol. 12(14), pp. 89–109.

O’Toole J.M.,On the idea of uniqueness, “American Archivist“ 2007, vol. 57, pp. 632–658, repr. in American archival studies. Readings in theory and practice, ed. R.C. Jimerson, Chicago 2000, pp. 245–277.

Principles of Access to Archives, http://www.ica.org/sites/default/files/ICA_Access-principles_EN.pdf, accessed 1 July 2023 r.

Recommendation No. R (2000) 13 of the Committee of Ministers to member stateson a European policy on access to archives, https://rm.coe.int/16804cea4f, accessed 1 July 2023.

Rekrut A., Material literacy. Reading records as material culture, “Archivaria” 2003, vol. 60, pp. 11–37.

Rekrut A., Reconnecting mind and matter. Materiality in archival theory and practice, Manitoba 2009, http://hdl.handle.net/1993/3161, accessed 1 July 2023.

Roeschley A., Kim J., Something that feels like a community”. The role of personal stories in building community‑based participatory archives, “Archival Science” 2019, vol. 19, pp. 27–49.

Schwarz J.M., Cook T., Archives, records, and power: the making of modern memory, “Archival Science” 2002, vol. 2, pp. 1–19.

Scott C., The archivist as translator. Representation and the language of context, “American Archivist” 2022, vol. 85, pp. 126–145.

Scott J.C., Seeing like a state. How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed, Yale University Press 1998.

Seed P., Ceremonies of possession in Europe’s conquest of the New World, 1492–1640, Cambridge 1995.

Shilton K., Srinivasan R., Participatory appraisal and arrangement for multicultural archival collections, “Archivaria” 2007, vol. 63, pp. 87–101.

Stoler A.L., Along the archival grain. Epistemic anxieties and colonial common sense, Princeton 2009.

Thijssen L., Duizend jaar Polen en Nederland, Zutphen 1992.

Thomas D., Fowler S., Johnson V., The silence of the archive, London 2017.

Thomassen T., A first introduction to archival science, “Archival Science” 2001, vol. 1, p. 375–385.

Trouillot M.R., Silencing the past. Power and the production of history, Boston 1995.

Valge J., Kibal B., Restrictions on access to archives and records in Europe: A history and the current situation, “Journal of the Society of Archivists” 2007, vol. 28, pp. 193–214.

Wiśniewska-Drewniak M., Inaczej to zniknie. Archiwa społeczne w Polsce – wielokrotne stadium przypadku, Toruń 2019.

Yakel E., Archival representation, “Archival Science” 2003, vol. 3, p. 1–25.

Yakel E., Balancing archival authority with encouraging authentic voices to engage with records, [in:] A different kind of web. New connections between archives and our users, ed. K. Theimer, Chicago 2011, pp. 75–101.

Yakel E., Thinking inside and outside the boxes. Archival reference services at the turn of the century, “Archivaria” 2000, vol. 49, pp. 140–160.

Yakel E., Who represents the past? Archives, records, and the social web, [in:]. Controlling the past. Documenting society and institutions. Essays in honor of Helen Willa Samuels, ed. T. Cook, Chicago 2011, pp. 257–278.

Yeo G., Can we keep everything? The future of appraisal in a world of digital profusion, [in:] Archival futures, ed. C. Brown, London 2018, pp. 45–63.

Yeo G., Records, information and data. Exploring the role of record-keeping in an information culture, Cambridge 2018.

Zavala J., Allina Migoni A., Caswell M., Geraci N., Cifor M., “A process where we’re all at the table”. Community archives challenging dominant modes of archival practice, “Archives and Manuscripts” 2017, vol. 45, pp. 202–215.