Quarterly Journal of the History of Science and Technology, Volume 66, Issue 2, 2021, pp. 7 - 8
Quarterly Journal of the History of Science and Technology, Volume 66, Issue 2, 2021, pp. 11 - 23
https://doi.org/10.4467/0023589XKHNT.21.010.13708Quarterly Journal of the History of Science and Technology, Volume 66, Issue 2, 2021, pp. 25 - 45
https://doi.org/10.4467/0023589XKHNT.21.011.13709Quarterly Journal of the History of Science and Technology, Volume 66, Issue 2, 2021, pp. 47 - 54
https://doi.org/10.4467/0023589XKHNT.21.012.13710Quarterly Journal of the History of Science and Technology, Volume 66, Issue 2, 2021, pp. 55 - 67
https://doi.org/10.4467/0023589XKHNT.21.013.13711Quarterly Journal of the History of Science and Technology, Volume 66, Issue 2, 2021, pp. 69 - 86
https://doi.org/10.4467/0023589XKHNT.21.014.13712Quarterly Journal of the History of Science and Technology, Volume 66, Issue 2, 2021, pp. 87 - 102
https://doi.org/10.4467/0023589XKHNT.21.015.13713Słowa kluczowe: historiography of science, history of science, cognizing cultures – cognized cultures, researchers’ social roles with respect to the past, homo metahistoricus, Johannes Baptista Montanus, Walenty Sierpiński of Lublin, Consultationum medicinalium, medical history, eutectic solvents, history of science, NADES, Onomasticon, Julius Pollux, medical tools, ancient medicine, pharmacy, working conditions, society, history of medicine, Old-Polish memoirs, egodocuments, 16th–17th centuries
