Psychografia, emocje społeczne i nowe formy komunikacji politycznej

Marcin Galent

Tytuły

Abstrakt

Psychographics, Social Emotions and New Forms of Political Communication

The development of social media in recent years has radically transformed the public sphere and, along with it, forms of political communication. Unfortunately, it seems that the current institutional order is not sufficiently adapted to the challenges posed by the saturation of social relations mediated by digital technologies. The recent years are full of examples of the lack of adequacy of existing solutions to revolutionary technological changes. This primarily concerns the Internet, which one’s rapid development has created a specific ecosystem that enabled the development of several highly influential platforms. Global social media enable creation and proliferation of knowledge in a vast, globally crosslinked and interrelated information environment. Such a situation creates many possibilities that are potentially conducive to public debate, but on the other hand it raises substantive and substantiated questions about the manner and rules according to which this information circuit is carried out. There is much evidence that social control based solely on traditional ethical canons is no longer sufficient. The public discourse loses signs of Habermasian rationality and is increasingly colonized by political actors who do not hesitate to manipulate public opinion and influence social emotions on a massive scale.

Słowa kluczowe

micro-targeting, social emotions, Internet, social media, political communication

Internet, social media, political communication, micro-targeting, social emotions

Bibliografia

Alcott H., Gentzkow M. (2016). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Working Paper, National Boureau of Economic Research [http://www.nber.org/papers/w23089; 14.11.2016].

Berners-Lee T. (2017). Three challenge of the web, according to its inventor [http://webfoundation.org/2017/03/web-turns-28-letter/; 10.04.2017].

Booth R. (2017). Electoral Commission urged to investigate Farage’s Brexit campaign. The Guardian, 2.03.2017 [https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/mar/02/electoral-commission-urged-to-investigate-farages-brexit campaign?utm_source=POLITICO.EU&utm_campaign=bdcdbedaa2-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_03_02&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_10959edeb5-bdcdbedaa2-190009869; 3.03.2017].

Booth R. (2014). Facebook reveals news feed experiment to control emotions. The Guardian, 30.06.2014 [https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/29/facebook-users-Emotions-news-feeds; 12.12.2016].

Cadwalladr C. (2016). Google, democracy and the truth about internet search. The Guardian, 4.12.2016[https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/dec/04/google-democracy-truth-internet-search-facebook; 4.12.2016].

Cadwalladr C. (2017). Robert Mercer: the big data billionaire waging war on mainstream media. The Guardian, 26.02.2017 [https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/feb/26/robert-mercer-breitbart-war-on-media-steve-bannon-donald-trump-nigel-farage; 26.02.2017].

Castells M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Davies H. (2015). Ted Cruz using firm that harvested data on millions of unwitting Facebook users. The Guardian, 11.12.2015 [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/dec/11/senator-ted-cruz-president-campaign-facebook-user-data; 30.10.2017]

Davis W. (2017). How statistics lost their power. The Guardian, 19.01.2017 [https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jan/19/crisis-of-statistics-big-data-democracy; 19.01.2017].

Duval A. (2017). Your Free Will has been compromised. Patheos, 27.01.2017 [http://www.patheos.com/blogs/tippling/2017/01/27/free-will-compromised/; 10.06.2017].

El-Bermawy M. (2016). Your Filter Bubble is Destroying Democracy. Wired, 18.11.2016 [https://www.wired.com/2016/11/filter-bubble-destroying-democracy/; 5.06.2017].

Gottfried J., Shearer E. (2016). News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2016 [http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/; 5.06.2017].

Grassegger V.H., Krogerus M. (2016). Ich habe nur gezeigt, dass es die Bombe gibt. Das Magazin, 3.12.2016 [https://www.dasmagazin.ch/2016/12/03/ich-habe-nur-gezeigt-dass-es-die-bombe-gibt/; 6.12.2016].

Green J., Issenberg S. (2016). Win or lose, the Republican candidate and his inner circle have built a direct marketing operation that could power a TV network – or finish off the GOP. Bloomberg, 27.10.2016 [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-10-27/inside-the-trump-bunker-with-12-days-to-go; 10.06.2017].

Grimmelmann J. (2014). The Laboratorium: As Flies to Wanton Boys. Blog autora, 28.06.2014 [http://laboratorium.net/archive/2014/06/28/as_flies_to_wanton_boys; 23.02.2017].

Halliday J. (2013). Facebook: four out of five daily users log on via smartphone or tablet. The Guardian, 14.08.2013 [https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/aug/14/facebook-users-smartphone-tablet; 5.06.2017].

Halpern S. (2017). How He Used Facebook to Win. The New York Review of Books, 8.06.2017 [http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2017/06/08/how-trump-used-facebook-to-win/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=NYR%20Trump%20and%20Facebook%20Martin%20Luther%20Javier%20Valdez&utm_content=NYR%20Trump%20and%20Facebook%20Martin%20Luther%20Javier%20Valdez+CID_506d9d29e50bc45d7dbaf7a11aa0ed87&utm_source=Newsletter&utm_term=How%20He%20Used%20Facebook%20to%20Win; 8.06.2017].

Hersh E. (2015). Hacking the Electorat. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kosinski M., Stillwell D., Graepel T. (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, vol. 110, no. 15, s. 5802–5805,doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218772110 [http://www.pnas.org/content/110/15/5802.figures-only; 12.12.2016].

Kramer A.D.I., Guillory J.E., Hancock J.T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, vol. 111, no. 24, s. 8788–8790,doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320040111.

Lapowsky I. (2016). Here is how Facebook actually won Trump the presidency. Wired, 11.15.2016 [https://www.wired.com/2016/11/facebook-won-trump-election-not-just-fake-news/; 10.06.2017].

Mitchell A., Gottfried J., Matsa K. (2015). Facebook Top Source for Political News Among Millennials [http://www.journalism.org/2015/06/01/facebook-top-source-for-political-news
-among-millennials/; 5.06.2017].

Nash A. (2016). Affect, People and Digital Social Networks. W: Y.S. Tettegah (red.). Emotions, Technology and Social Media (s. 3–23). London: Elsevier.

Pariser E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin.

Piketty T. (2015). Kapitał w XXI wieku. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.

Quinn B. (2016). Google given access to healthcare data of up to 1.6 million patients. The Guardian, 4.05.2016 [https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/may/04/google-
deepmind-access-healthcare-data-patients; 4.02.2017].

Schwarz H.A., Eichstaedt J.C., Kern M.L., Dziurzynski L., Ramones S.M., Agrawal M., Shah A., Kosinski M., Stillwell D.E.P., Seligman M.E.P., Ungar L.H. (2013). Personality, Gender, and Age in the Language of Social Media: The Open-Vocabulary Approach. PLOS ONE, wrzesień 2013, vol. 8, iss. 8, s. 1–16.

Sclgroup.cc (2017) [https://sclgroup.cc/home; 12.06.2017].

Sieńko A. (2017). Jeśli lajkujesz na Facebooku, to możesz się bać. Polak opracował genialny system, który wykorzystał Donald Trump. Inn Poland, 21.01.2017 [http://innpoland.pl/132421,za-pomoca-analizy-lajkow-jest-w-stanie-powiedziec-o-tobie-wiecej-niz-twoi-rodzice-facebook-grozil-mu-za-to-sadem; 22.05.2017].

Silverman C., Singer-Vine J. (2016). Most Americans who see fake news believe it. Buzz Feednews, 7.12.2016 [https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/fake-news-survey; 25.02.2017].

Sputniknews (2017). Calls for Inquiry Into Farage Backed Leave.EU Campaign Over Profiling Tech. Sputniknews, 3.03.2017 [https://sputniknews.com/politics/201703031051234029-ukip-facebook-leave-eu/; 10.06.2017].

Srnicek N. (2016). Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Sustein C.R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Sustein C.R. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Templin J., Ray A., Delaney K. (2017). Filter Bubbles. Quartz, 21.02.2017 [https://qz.com/913114/bill-gates-says-filter-bubbles-are-a-serious-problem-with-news/; 5.06.2017].

Vestager M. (2017). A healthy democracy in a social media age, 7.06.2017 [https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/vestager/announcements/healthy-democracy-social-media-age_en; 10.06.2017].

Waterson J., Dugan E. (2017). The Tories Are Exploiting A New Loophole To Launch A Last-Minute Facebook Ad Blitz. BuzzFeednews, 7.06.2017 [https://www.buzzfeed.com/jimwaterson/the-tories-are-exploiting-a-new-loophole-to-launch-a-last?utm_term=.jsA1MNmvN#.caK9MV6nV; 07.06.2017].

Weedon J., Nuland W., Samos A. (2017). Information Operations and Facebook. [https://fbnewsroomus.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/facebook-and-information-operations-v1.pdf; 29.04.2017].

Zawadzki B., Strelau J., Szczepaniak P., Śliwińska M. (1998).Inwentarz osobowości NEO-FFI Costy i McCrae. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP.

Informacje

Informacje: Zeszyty Prasoznawcze, 2017, Tom 60, Numer 2 (230), s. 265-281

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/22996362PZ.17.018.7298

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

Psychografia, emocje społeczne i nowe formy komunikacji politycznej

Angielski:

Psychographics, Social Emotions and New Forms of Political Communication

Autorzy

Marcin Galent

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8072-0101

Instytut Europeistyki Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, ul. Jodłowa 13, 30-252 Kraków

Publikacja: 08.12.2017

Status artykułu: Otwarte

Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND

Udział procentowy autorów:

Marcin Galent (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Polski

Liczba wyświetleń: 3067

Liczba pobrań: 1632

<p> Psychografia, emocje społeczne i nowe formy komunikacji politycznej</p>

Pobierz pełny tekst

Tytuły

Abstrakt

Słowa kluczowe

Bibliografia

Informacje

Autorzy