The Development of Whistleblowing Laws in the United States and Europe (de lege ferenda remarks)

Łucja Kobroń-Gąsiorowska

The Development of Whistleblowing Laws in the United States and Europe (de lege ferenda remarks)

Data publikacji: 16.09.2021

Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej (Studies on Labour Law and Social Policy), Volume 28 (2021), Tom 28 Zeszyt 2, s. 139 - 155

https://doi.org/10.4467/25444654SPP.21.012.13402

Autorzy

Pobierz pełny tekst

PDF

drukuj

Tytuły

The Development of Whistleblowing Laws in the United States and Europe (de lege ferenda remarks)

Abstrakt

Corruption, harassment in a workplace, practices contrary to the correct work process, and many others are irregularities that can arise in any enterprise. This is a problem that affects established democracies and free markets and post-communist countries that are transitioning to democracy and market economies. While the causes of irregularities vary, the tools often suggested tackling them include that do not necessarily encourage potential whistleblowers to report them, whether inside or outside the organization. This article discusses the role of whistleblowing as a whistleblowing tool. Describes the law and whistleblowing in a comparative context, focusing on the United States and the European Union. The article then concludes with recommendations for strengthening whistleblowing in Europe, where reporting irregularities is just beginning, and the level of protection differs between the Member States.

ASJC: 3308, JEL: K31

Słowa kluczowe

whistleblowing, whistleblower, United States, European Union; whistleblowing, sygnalista, Stany Zjednoczone, Unia Europejska

whistleblowing, whistleblower, United States, European Union

Bibliografia

Pobierz bibliografię

Dyck A., Morse A., Zingales L. (2010) Who Blows the Whistle on Corporate Fraud?, “Journal of Finance,” Vol. 65, Issue 6.

Alford C.F. (2001) Whistleblowers: Broken Lives and Organizational Power, https://whistleblowersblog.org/2018/03/articles/whistleblower-news/corporate-whistleblowers/inside-the-mind-of-a-whistleblower/ (access: 12 October 2020).

Bhagat S., Bolton B. (2009) Sarbanes-Oxley, Governance and performance, Working Paper, University of Colorado at Boulder.

Boatright J. (2000) Ethics and the Conduct of Business, 3rd Ed., Upper Saddle River.

Calvert L. (1998) The Qui Tam Provision of the False Claims Act: Congressional Missile or a Net Full of Holes?, “The Annual Survey of American Law.”

Ching-Pu Ch., Tsung Lai Ch. (2014) To Blow or not to Blow the Whistle: The effects of potential harm, social pressure and organisational commitment on whistleblowing intention and behaviour, „Business Ethics: A European review,” Vol. 23, Issue 3.

Farrell D., Petersen J.C. (1982) Patterns of Political Behavior in Organizations, “Academy of Management Review,” Vol. 7.

Hirschman A.O. (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States, Cambridge (Mass.).

Huseynova D., Piperigos K. (2018) Justice for Justice: Protecting Whistleblowers in the EU. Protection of Whistleblowers: The Why and the How, http://transparency.eu/wp-content/ uploads/2018/04/WB_Transparency-Group-CoE-17-18.pdf (access: 12 August 2020).

Johnson R. (2003) Whistle-Blowing: When It Works—And Why, Boulder.

Jubb P.B. (1999) Whistleblowing: A Restrictive Definition and Interpretation, “Journal of Business Ethics,” Vol. 21.

King G. III (1999) The Implications of an Organization’s Structure on Whistleblowing, “Journal of Business Ethics,” Vol. 20(4).

Kobroń Ł. (2013) Whistleblower. Strażnik wartości czy donosiciel?, “Palestra,” nr 11–12.

Kobroń Ł. (2015) Czy Polskę czeka era etycznych donosów?, “Zeszyty Naukowe Towarzystwa Doktorantów UJ. Nauki Społeczne,” t. 10.

Kobroń-Gąsiorowska Ł. (2018) Whistleblower w prawie europejskim. Ochrona whistleblowera czy informacji, “Roczniki Administracji i Prawa,” t. 2.

Kobroń-Gąsiorowska Ł. (2019) Interes Publiczny jako element podstawowy funkcji ochronnej prawa pracy - w kontekście ochrony sygnalistów, “Roczniki Administracji i Prawa,” t. 2.

Kohn S. (2006) What Price Free Speech? Whistleblowers and the Garcetti v. Ceballos Decision, National Whistleblowers Centre, https://www.whistleblowers.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ ceballos.final_.testimony.pdf (access: 12 October 2020).

Lacayo R., Ripley A. (2002) Persons of the Year, http://content.time.com/time/magazine/ article/0,9171,1003998,00.html (access: 12 October 2020).

Liszcz T. (2005) Ogólna charakterystyka prawa pracy [in:] R. Borek-Buchajczuk (red.), Zarys prawa pracy, Lublin. Moberly R.E. (2007) SOX and Whistleblowing: The Concerns, College of Law, “Faculty Publications,” Vol. 32.

Moberly R.E. (2012) Sarbanes–Oxley’s Whistleblower Provisions: Ten Years Later, “South Carolina Law Review,” Vol. 64. Nader R., Petkas P.J., Blackwell K. (eds.) (1972) Whistle Blowing: The Report of the Conference on Professional Responsibility, New York.

Near J.P., Rehg M.Y., Scotter J.R. Van, Miceli M.P. (2009) Does Type of Wrongdoing Affect the Whistle-Blowing Process?, “Business Ethics Quarterly,” Vol. 14(2).

Near J.P., Miceli M.P. (1985) Organizational Dissidence: The Case of Whistle-Blowing, “Journal of Business Ethics,” Vol. 4.

Near J.P., Miceli M.P. (1992) Blowing the Whistle: The Organizational and Legal Implications for Companies and Employees, New York.

Near J.P., Rehg M.T., Scotter Van J., Miceli M.P. (2004) Does Type of Wrongdoing Affect the Whistle-Blowing Process, „Business Ethics Quarterly,” Vol. 14, No. 2.

Near J.P., Miceli M.P., Dworkin T.M. (2009) A Word to the Wise: How Managers and Policy-Makers Can Encourage Employees to Report Wrongdoing, “Journal of Business Ethics,” Vol. 86(3).

North G., Buckley R. (2012) The Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act: Unresolved Issues of Regulatory Culture and Mindset, “Melbourne University Law Review,” Vol. 35(2).

Omzigt P. (2009) The Protection of “Whistle-Blowers,” https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/ Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=12302&lang=en (access: 12 August 2020).

Oppenheimer D.B. (2003) Verdicts Matter: An Empirical Study of California Employment Discrimination and Wrongful Discharge Jury Verdicts Reveals Low Success Rates for Women and Minorities, https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ davlr37&div=25&id=&page= (access: 12 August 2020).

Paton W.O., Ferguson R., Bingham Ch., Casadonte D.J. (2013) Whistleblowing in Higher Education, https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/bitstream/handle/2346/50651/Bard_Jennifer_Diss.pdf?sequence=1 (access: 12 August 2020).

Sobczyk A. (2014) Różnicowanie praw (ochrony) zatrudnionych – wybrane kryteria i ich ocena [in:] M. Bosak (red.), Funkcja ochronna prawa pracy a wyzwania współczesności, Warszawa.

Vaughn R.G. (2005) America’s First Comprehensive Statute Protecting Corporate Whistleblowers, “Administrative Law Review,” Vol. 57, No. 1.

Wolfe S., Worth. M., Dreyfus S., Brown A.J. (2014) Whistleblower Protection Laws in G20 Countries: Priorities for Action, https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20140908101050/http:// pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/148392/20140917-0713/blueprintforfreespeech.net/wp-content/ uploads/2014/09/Whistleblower-Protection-Laws-in-G20-Countries-Priorities-for-Action. pdf (access: 20 October 2020).

Court sentences

Judgment of the Supreme Court of 15 November 2001, II UKN 620/00, OSNP 2003, No. 15, item 367.

Judgment of the Supreme Court of 3 March 1975, I PR 16/75, Lex Polonica 318105.

European Court of Human Rights, Guja v. Moldova, Application No. 14277/04 of 12 February 2008.

Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006).

United States ex rel. Marcus v. Hess, 317 U.S. 537, 541–42, 1943.

United States v. Griswold, 24 F. 361, 366, 1885.

Welch v. Cardinal Bankshares Corp., 407 F. Supp. 2d 773 (W.D. Va. 2006).

Legal acts

Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law.

Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub. L No. 111–203.

European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 April 2019 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of persons reporting on breaches of Union law, {COM(2018) 0218}, C8-0159/2018, 2018/0106(COD).

False Claims Amendments Act (1986). Pub. L No. 99–562, 100 Stat. 3153, codified as amended at 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729–3733.

Sarbanes–Oxley Act (2002). Pub. L No. 107–204, 116 Stat. 745.

Informacje

Informacje: Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej (Studies on Labour Law and Social Policy), Volume 28 (2021), Tom 28 Zeszyt 2, s. 139 - 155

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/25444654SPP.21.012.13402

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

The Development of Whistleblowing Laws in the United States and Europe (de lege ferenda remarks)

Angielski:

The Development of Whistleblowing Laws in the United States and Europe (de lege ferenda remarks)

Autorzy

Łucja Kobroń-Gąsiorowska

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8669-452X

Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
ul. Podchorążych 2, 30-084 Kraków, Polska

Publikacja: 16.09.2021

Status artykułu: Otwarte

Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND

Udział procentowy autorów:

Łucja Kobroń-Gąsiorowska (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

Języki publikacji:

Angielski

Liczba wyświetleń: 1117

Liczba pobrań: 672

<p> The Development of Whistleblowing Laws in the United States and Europe (<em>de lege ferenda</em> remarks)</p>

Pobierz xml