Scope of Reference of Employees’ Right to Daily and Weekly Rest (A Discussion Article)

Beata Rutkowska

Scope of Reference of Employees’ Right to Daily and Weekly Rest (A Discussion Article)

Data publikacji: 21.07.2022

Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej (Studies on Labour Law and Social Policy), Volume 29 (2022), Tom 29 Zeszyt 2, s. 201 - 212

https://doi.org/10.4467/25444654SPP.22.017.15691

Autorzy

Pobierz pełny tekst

PDF

drukuj

Tytuły

Scope of Reference of Employees’ Right to Daily and Weekly Rest (A Discussion Article)

Abstrakt

The paper attempts to answer the question of whether periods of daily and weekly rest provided for in Art. 132 and 133 of the Labour Code Act of 26 June 1974 are to be accounted for with reference to the employment relationship, employer, or employee. Determinations in this respect were made by analysing various situations occurring in practice—employment of an employee with one employer on the basis of one employment relationship, simultaneous employment of an employee in several employment relationships with that employer, and parallel employment of an employee by more than one employer. This takes into account the need to ensure that the employee is afforded rest periods within strictly defined legal limits, as well as the nature of the right to daily and weekly rest and the purposes of this right.

ASJC: 3308, JEL: K31

Słowa kluczowe

employee’s right to daily and weekly rest, additional employment under an employment relationship, working time; prawo pracownika do odpoczynku dobowego i tygodniowego, dodatkowe zatrudnienie na podstawie stosunku pracy, czas pracy

employee’s right to daily and weekly rest, additional employment under an employment relationship, working time

Bibliografia

Pobierz bibliografię

Cudowski B. (2005) Wielość zatrudnienia pracowniczego u jednego pracodawcy, „Państwo i Prawo,” No. 3.

Cudowski B. (2007) Dodatkowe zatrudnienie, Warszawa.

Jaśkowski K. (2021) Komentarz do art. 132 k.p., teza 2 [in:] K. Jaśkowski, E. Maniewska, Komentarz aktualizowany do Kodeksu pracy, LEX.

Kubot Z. (2004) Praca rotacyjna w dwóch stosunkach pracy, „Praca i Zabezpieczenie Społeczne,” No. 12.

Kulig K. (2015) Aksjologiczne podłoże pracowniczego prawa do odpoczynku dobowego, „Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej,” Vol 22.

Liszcz T. (2018) Aksjologiczne podstawy prawa pracy. Zarys problematyki, Lublin.

Morawski L. (2008) Wstęp do prawoznawstwa, Toruń.

Piątkowski J. (2017) Aksjologiczne i normatywne podstawy prawa stosunku pracy, Toruń.

Pisarczyk Ł. (2017) Komentarz do art. 132 k.p., teza 2 [in:] L. Florek (ed.), Kodeks pracy. Komentarz, Warszawa, LEX.

Prusinowski P. (2012) Ochronny charakter norm o czasie pracy a zatrudnienie u dwóch i więcej pracodawców, “Gdańsko-Łódzkie Roczniki Prawa Pracy i Prawa Socjalnego,” No. 2.

Prusinowski P. (2017) Podmiotowe „rozdrabnianie” świadczenia pracy [in:] M. Szabłowska-Juckiewicz, B. Rutkowska, A. Napiórkowska (eds.), Tendencje rozwojowe indywidualnego i zbiorowego prawa pracy. Księga Jubileuszowa Profesora Grzegorza Goździewicza, Toruń.

Rycak M. (2008) Wymiar i rozkład czasu pracy, Warszawa.

Rycak M. (2017) Czas pracy a ochrona życia rodzinnego pracowników [in:] M. Szabłowska-Juckiewicz, B. Rutkowska, A. Napiórkowska (eds.), Tendencje rozwojowe indywidualnego i zbiorowego prawa pracy. Księga Jubileuszowa Profesora Grzegorza Goździewicza, Toruń.

Wiącek A. (2015) Prawo pracownika do wypoczynku a regulacja prawna czasu pracy, Lublin.

Wujczyk M. (2012) Prawo pracownika do ochrony prywatności, Warszawa.

Court sentences

Resolution of the Supreme Court of 12 March 1969, III PZP 1/69, LEX 15183.

Resolution of the Supreme Court of 12 April 1994, I PZP 13/94, LEX 11794.

Judgment of the Supreme Court of 13 March 1997, I PKN 43/97, LEX 30702.

Judgment of the Supreme Court of 14 February 2002, I PKN 876/00, LEX 82595.

Judgment of the Supreme Court of 8 October 2009, II PK 110/09, LEX 558295.

Judgment of the Supreme Court of 3 February 2011, III PK 32/10, LEX 1375430.

Judgment of the Supreme Court of 10 March 2011, III PK 50/10, LEX 901624.

Judgment of the Supreme Court of 21 June 2011, III PK 96/10, LEX 1212768.

Judgment of the CJEU of 7 September 2006, Commission of the European Communities v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, C-484/04, LEX 226889.

Judgment of the CJEU of 10 September 2015, Federacion de Servicios Privados del sindicato Comisiones obreras (CC.OO.) v. Tyco Integrated Security SL, Tyco Integrated Fire & Security Corporation Servicios SA, C-266/14, LEX 1785718.

Judgment of the CJEU of 17 March 2021, Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti v. Organismul Intermediar pentru Programul Operaţional Capital Uman – Ministerul Educaţiei Naţionale, C-585/19, LEX 3147631.

Legal acts

Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organization of working time, OJ L 1993/307, pp. 18–24.

Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, OJ L 2003/299, pp. 9–19.

The Labour Code Act of 26 June 1974, Dz.U. 2020, item 1320 consolidated text, as amended.

The Act of 24 August 2001 on drivers’working time, Dz.U. 2001, No. 123, item 1354, as amended.

The Act of 14 November 2003 amending the Labour Code and certain other acts, Dz.U. 2003, No. 213, item 2081.

The Act of 16 April 2004 on drivers’working time, Dz.U. 2019, item 1412 consolidated text.

Internet sources

Report from the Commission, State of Implementation of Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 Concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (‘Working Time Directive’)—COM(2000) 787 final, https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?langId=en&docId=2419& (access: 12 November 2021).

Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on implementation by Member States of Directive 2003/88/EC (‘The Working Time Directive’), COM(2010) 802 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52010DC0802 (access: 12 November 2021).

Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, Report on the implementation by Member States of Directive 2003/88/EC concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, COM(2017) 254 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52017DC0254(access: 12 November 2021).

Informacje

Informacje: Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej (Studies on Labour Law and Social Policy), Volume 29 (2022), Tom 29 Zeszyt 2, s. 201 - 212

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/25444654SPP.22.017.15691

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

Scope of Reference of Employees’ Right to Daily and Weekly Rest (A Discussion Article)

Angielski:

Scope of Reference of Employees’ Right to Daily and Weekly Rest (A Discussion Article)

Autorzy

Beata Rutkowska

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1920-8261

Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu
Polska

Publikacja: 21.07.2022

Status artykułu: Otwarte

Licencja: CC BY

Udział procentowy autorów:

Beata Rutkowska (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

Języki publikacji:

Angielski

Liczba wyświetleń: 789

Liczba pobrań: 332

<p> Scope of Reference of Employees’ Right to Daily and Weekly Rest (A Discussion Article)</p>

Pobierz xml