Możliwości kształtowania charakteru uczniów w ocenie nauczycieli
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEMożliwości kształtowania charakteru uczniów w ocenie nauczycieli
Data publikacji: 20.09.2011
Psychologia Rozwojowa, 2011, Tom 16, Numer 2, s. 53 - 66
https://doi.org/10.4467/20843879PR.11.011.0184Autorzy
Możliwości kształtowania charakteru uczniów w ocenie nauczycieli
Teachers’ beliefs concerning the possibility of modeling pupils’ moral character
The main aim of the present investigation is to gain knowledge about teachers’ beliefs concerning the possibility of modeling pupils’ moral character. The main components in the process of moral education are a teacher’s personality, awareness of their role in education, their skills and competencies and belief in the possibility of infl uencing their pupils. In view of these facts it has been agreed that there should be conducted a study to examine how teachers assess their own abilities and skills in modeling their pupils’ character, and how they see teachers’ overall possibilities in this area.
The research used a questionnaire “Character Education Effi cacy Belief Instrument” developed by Milson and Mehlig (2002). This tool measures teachers’ beliefs concerning their effectiveness of modeling pupils’ moral character. There are two scales used in this measurement. The first scale allows to assess teachers’ personal effectiveness of teaching (personal teaching efficacy – PTE) and the second one allows to assess general effectiveness of teaching (general teaching efficacy – GTE). There were 218 people involved in the research (83% were women, and 17% men). The results show a signifi cant difference between the assessment of personal teaching effectiveness (PTE) and general teaching effectiveness (GTE). Respondents (teachers) evaluate their own abilities in modeling their pupils’ moral characters higher than the general ability of teachers in this respect. Three factors were taken into account in the analysis: teacher’s gender, type of school where the respondents work and subjects they teach.
Berkowitz M., Schaeffer E., Bier M. (2001), Character Education in the United States. Education in the North, New Series, 9.
Brzezińska A., Brzeziński J., (2006), Skale szacunkowe w badaniach diagnostycznych [w:] J. Brzeziński (red.), Metodologia badań psychologicznych. Warszawa:Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Cichoń W. (1996), Wartości, człowiek, wychowanie. Zarys problematyki aksjologiczno-wychowawczej. Kraków: Wydawnictwo UJ.
Feingold A. (1994), Gender Differences in Personality – a Metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, s. 429–456.
Gałkowski S. (2001), Rozwój i odpowiedzialność. Antropologiczne podstawy koncepcji wychowania moralnego. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
Gibson S., Dembo M.H. (1984), Teacher Effi cacy: A Construct Validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 4, 569–581.
Kohlberg L. (1981), The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice, vol. 1. San Francisco: Harper and Row Publishers.
Kohlberg L., Meyer R. (1993), Rozwój jako cel wychowania [w:] Z. Kwieciński, L. Witkowski (red.), Spory o edukację. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych.
Mandal E. (2003), Kobiecość i męskość. Popularne opinie a badania naukowe. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie Żak.
Mandal E. (2004), Podmiotowe i interpersonalne konsekwencje stereotypów związanych z płcią. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Milson A.J., Mehlig L.M. (2002), Elementary School Teachers’ Sense of Effi cacy for Character Education. Journal of Educational Research, 96, 1, 47–54.
Narvarez D. (2006), Integrative Ethical Education [w:] M. Killen, J. Smetana (red.), Handbook of Moral Development. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Weiner B. (1974), Achievment Motivation and Attribition Theory. Morristown, NY: General Learning Press.
Weiner B., Nierenberg R., Goldberg M. (1979), Social Learning (Locus of Control) Versus Attribution (Causal Stability) Interpretations of Expectancy of Success. Journal of Personality, 44, 52–68.
White R. (1963), Ego and Realit in Psychoanalytic Theory. A Proposal for Independent Ego Energies. Psychological Issues, 3, 17–21.
Informacje: Psychologia Rozwojowa, 2011, Tom 16, Numer 2, s. 53 - 66
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Możliwości kształtowania charakteru uczniów w ocenie nauczycieli
Teachers’ beliefs concerning the possibility of modeling pupils’ moral character
Instytut Psychologii, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, ul. Ingardena 6, 30-060 Kraków
Publikacja: 20.09.2011
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: Żadna
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
PolskiLiczba wyświetleń: 2689
Liczba pobrań: 1701