Przestrzeń Urbanistyka Architektura, Volume 2/2019, 2019, pp. 7 - 20
https://doi.org/10.4467/00000000PUA.19.019.11439Przestrzeń Urbanistyka Architektura, Volume 2/2019, 2019, pp. 23 - 30
https://doi.org/10.4467/00000000PUA.19.018.11438Przestrzeń Urbanistyka Architektura, Volume 2/2019, 2019, pp. 33 - 48
https://doi.org/10.4467/00000000PUA.19.025.11499Przestrzeń Urbanistyka Architektura, Volume 2/2019, 2019, pp. 51 - 60
https://doi.org/10.4467/00000000PUA.19.021.11441Przestrzeń Urbanistyka Architektura, Volume 2/2019, 2019, pp. 61 - 74
https://doi.org/10.4467/00000000PUA.19.022.11442Przestrzeń Urbanistyka Architektura, Volume 2/2019, 2019, pp. 75 - 84
https://doi.org/10.4467/00000000PUA.19.023.11443Przestrzeń Urbanistyka Architektura, Volume 2/2019, 2019, pp. 85 - 96
https://doi.org/10.4467/00000000PUA.19.024.11444Słowa kluczowe: Krakow, urbanism, suburbanisation, housing estate, urban planning, development, city, informal cities, informal settlements, slums, social architecture, poverty, spa park, spa town, spatial planning in spa towns, monument protection law, immovable monuments, protection of monument names, architecture, memory, communication, urban space, thanatourism, street art, Paris, cooperation, co-competence, coordination, protection of surroundings, monuments, heritage
