Przestrzeń Urbanistyka Architektura, Volume 2/2020, 2020, pp. 7 - 44
https://doi.org/10.4467/00000000PUA.20.016.13077Przestrzeń Urbanistyka Architektura, Volume 2/2020, 2020, pp. 45 - 70
https://doi.org/10.4467/00000000PUA.20.014.13063Przestrzeń Urbanistyka Architektura, Volume 2/2020, 2020, pp. 73 - 92
https://doi.org/10.4467/00000000PUA.20.011.13060Przestrzeń Urbanistyka Architektura, Volume 2/2020, 2020, pp. 93 - 108
https://doi.org/10.4467/00000000PUA.20.012.13061Przestrzeń Urbanistyka Architektura, Volume 2/2020, 2020, pp. 111 - 122
https://doi.org/10.4467/00000000PUA.20.010.13059Przestrzeń Urbanistyka Architektura, Volume 2/2020, 2020, pp. 125 - 147
https://doi.org/10.4467/00000000PUA.20.013.13062Przestrzeń Urbanistyka Architektura, Volume 2/2020, 2020, pp. 151 - 171
https://doi.org/10.4467/00000000PUA.20.015.13064Słowa kluczowe: public archaeology, Italy, Middle Ages, history, light archaeology, Florence, Jordan, Pro-Jerusalem Council, orientalism, Europeanisation, parahistorical creation, landscape changes, space, coexistence, city, inner city, suburban zone, revitalisation, diversity, futuristic architecture, shopping centre, river, transformation of riverside areas, landscape architecture, public space, playground, nature, education, Rzeszów, city centre, downtown tissue, regional architecture, Świętokrzyskie Mountains, Kielce, Polish regionalism
