Financial Law Review, Issue 15 (3)/ 2019, 2019, pp. 1 - 19
https://doi.org/10.4467/22996834FLR.19.011.11267Financial Law Review, Issue 15 (3)/ 2019, 2019, pp. 20 - 37
https://doi.org/10.4467/22996834FLR.19.012.11268Financial Law Review, Issue 15 (3)/ 2019, 2019, pp. 38 - 52
https://doi.org/10.4467/22996834FLR.19.013.11269Financial Law Review, Issue 15 (3)/ 2019, 2019, pp. 53 - 74
https://doi.org/10.4467/22996834FLR.19.014.11270Financial Law Review, Issue 15 (3)/ 2019, 2019, pp. 75 - 85
https://doi.org/10.4467/22996834FLR.19.015.11271Financial Law Review, Issue 15 (3)/ 2019, 2019, pp. 86 - 104
https://doi.org/10.4467/22996834FLR.19.016.11272Financial Law Review, Issue 15 (3)/ 2019, 2019, pp. 105 - 123
https://doi.org/10.4467/22996834FLR.19.017.11273Financial Law Review, Issue 15 (3)/ 2019, 2019, pp. 124 - 128
https://doi.org/10.4467/22996834FLR.19.018.11274Słowa kluczowe: Values, taxation, taxation fairness, equality in taxation, prohibition of discrimination, tax law, legal certainty, tax, securing order, VAT, MTIC fraud, fighting tax frauds, ultima ratio, Czech Republic, administrative justice, judicial review of decisions made by administrative authorities, Corporate Tax, Brexit, tax harmonisation, CC(C)TB., Elections, electoral fund, political party, national representation, sovereignty, Local taxes, codification of general tax law, cost, municipal tax authorities, Budget, Local Self-Government, Municipalities, Information Systems, Information Technologies, Financial Activities; The Budget Process; Participatory Budgeting; Public Control; E-Participatory Budgeting, Principle Of Transparency (Openness); Blockchain, Tax, levy, retail chain, state aid, legislation, tax law science, Constitutional Identity; Direct Taxation; Hierarchy; Sovereignty