FAQ
Jagiellonian University logo

Effects of external whistleblowing in Poland

Data publikacji: 31.03.2022

Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej (Studies on Labour Law and Social Policy), Volume 29 (2022), Tom 29 Zeszyt 1, s. 73 - 83

https://doi.org/10.4467/25444654SPP.22.007.15375

Autorzy

Łucja Kobroń-Gąsiorowska
Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
ul. Podchorążych 2, 30-084 Kraków, Polska
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8669-452X Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Tytuły

Effects of external whistleblowing in Poland

Abstrakt

In Poland, reporting of irregularities by employees has been largely ignored. This topic is not part of the professional-ethical or normative discourse. External disclosure involves reporting the irregularity to an external entity that can react or take follow-up action. The issue of external reporting is a highly controversial problem of labor law in Poland, which is limited by the primary obligation of an employee specified in the Labor Code in Art. 100 § 2 points 4. Under such conditions, employees who report irregularities to repair the organization are treated as persons violating their loyalty to the employer, even though they demonstrated the will to rectify the offense and the accompanying readiness to act. An attempt to go beyond this dilemma is to be the new Directive of the European Union on the protection of whistleblowers and the presented draft Polish act on the protection of whistleblowers submitted on October 18, 2021. The transposition of the Directive provisions turned out to be a failure on December 17, 2021. For employees who decide to report irregularities externally, reporting irregularities is a complex dilemma that may break the ties of trust and dismissal by employer-relevant regulations. The Polish Labor Code requires the conceptualization of the rationality of notifications, despite the lack of appropriate regulations in this regard.

ASJC: 3308, JEL: K31

Bibliografia

Pobierz bibliografię
Abazi V. (2019) Whistleblowing in Europe: A New Era of Legal Protections [in:] P. Czech, L. Heschl, K. Lukas, M. Nowak, G. Oberleitner (eds.), European Yearbook on Human Rights, Cambridge.
Abazi V. (2020) The European Union Whistleblower Directive: A “Game Changer” for Whistleblowing Protection?, “Industrial Law Journal,” Vol. 49, Issue 4.
Derlacz-Wawrowska M. (2013) Whistleblowing a ochrona informacji poufnych pracodawcy [in:] G. Uścińska (ed.), Prawo pracy. Refleksje i poszukiwania. Księga jubileuszowa Profesora Jerzego Wratnego, Warszawa.
Dral A. (2011) Ochrona pracowników przed działaniami odwetowymi pracodawcy w świetle międzynarodowego i polskiego prawa pracy [in:] J. Wratny, M.B. Rycak (eds.), Prawo pracy w świetle procesów integracji europejskiej. Księga Jubileuszowa Profesor Marii Matey-Tyrowicz, Warszawa.
Duska R.F (1990) Whistleblowing and Employee Loyalty [in:] J.R. Desjardins, J.J. McCall (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Business Ethics, Belmont, CA.
Dworkin T.M., Near J.P. (1997) A Better Statutory Approach to Whistle-Blowing, “Business Ethics Quarterly,” Vol. 7, Issue 1.
Handzel S. (2021) Whistleblowers in Healthcare: Recognizing Their Importance During COVID-19, https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/recognizing-importance-of-whistleblowersin-healthcare (access: 1 December 2021).
Johnson R.A. (2003) Whistleblowing: When It Works and Why, Boulder.
Kobroń Ł. (2013) Whistleblower: strażnik wartości czy donosiciel, “Palestra,” No. 8–9.
Kobroń Ł. (2015) Czy Polskę czeka era etycznych donosów? Społeczno-prawne aspekty działania, “Zeszyty Naukowe Towarzystwa Doktorantów Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Nauki Społeczne,” No. 10.
Kobroń-Gąsiorowska Ł. (2018) Informator w prawie europejskim. Ochrona whistleblowera czy informacji, “Roczniki Administracji i Prawa,” Vol. 18, Issue 2.
Kobroń-Gąsiorowska Ł. (2020) Poland on the Path towards Whistleblower Protection, “Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal,” Dispatch No. 27, https://cllpj.law.illinois.edu/dispatches (access: 1 December 2021).
Near J.P., Miceli, M.P. (1985) Organizational Dissidence: The Case of Whistleblowing, “Journal of Business Ethics,” Vol. 4.
Sanetra W. (1996) Rozwiązanie umowy o pracę bez wypowiedzenia w znowelizowanym kodeksie pracy, “Praca i Zabezpieczenie Społeczne,” No. 6.
Szewczyk H. (2020) Whistleblowing w zakładzie pracy w świetle nowej dyrektywy 2019/1937 Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) w sprawie ochrony osób zgłaszających przypadki naruszenia prawa Unii, “Praca i Zabezpieczenie Społeczne,” No. 2.
Wujczyk M. (2014) Podstawy whistleblowingu w polskim prawie pracy, “Przegląd Sądowy,” No. 6.
Internet sources
Annex to the Communication from the Commission, EU law: Better Results Through Better Application, OJ C 2017/18, pp. 10–20, ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/3/2016/PL/C-2016-8600-F1-PL-ANNEX-1-PART-1.PDF (access: 1 December 2021).
Annexes on the Proposal for a Directive on the protection of persons reporting on breaches of Union law, https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/annexes-proposal-directive-protection-personsreporting-breaches-union-law_en (access: 1 December 2021).
Commission Communication, Better monitoring of the application of Community law, 16 May 2003, {COM(2002)725 final}, https://ec.europa.eu/governance/docs/comm_infraction_en.pdf (access: 1 December 2021).
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, A new EU framework to strengthen the rule of law, 1 March 2014, {COM(2014) 158 final}, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52014DC0158&from=NL (access: 1 December 2021).
Communication from the Commission, A Europe of Effectiveness—Applying Community Law, 5 September 2007, {COM(2007) 502 final}, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:6fc1ad14-7018-485f-bceb-ab767b5c5927.0003.02/DOC_3&format=PDF (access: 1 December 2021).
European Commission, Whistleblower Protection: Commission Sets New, EU-wide Rules, Press Release, 23 April 2018, ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_18_3441 (access: 1 December 2021).
Political guidelines for the next term of the European Commission of 15 July 2014 and letters describing the tasks of 1 November 2014 sent by the President to the Vice-Presidents and Commissioners, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/the_working_methods_of_the_european_commission_2014-2019_november2014_en.pdf (access: 1 December 2021)
Public consultation on whistleblower protection, https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/just/item-detail.cfm?item_id=54254 (access: 1 December 2021).
Roziere positions whistleblower protection law as response to public concerns, https://whistleblowerprotection.eu/blog/roziere-positions-whistleblower-protection-law-as-response-to-public-concerns/ (access: 1 December 2021)
Legal acts
The Labour Code Act of 26 June 1974, Dz.U. 2019, item 1040 consolidated text, as amended.
Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, OJ C 2012/326, pp. 47–390.
Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law, OJ L 2019/305, pp. 17–56.
Regulation (EU) 2020/1503 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 October 2020 on European crowdfunding service providers for business, and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 and Directive (EU) 2019/1937 (Text with EEA relevance), OJ L 2020/347, pp. 1–49.
Court sentences
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 23 September 1997, I PKN 274/97, LEX 32888.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 16 November 2006, II PK 76/06, OSNP 2007, No. 21–22, item 312.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 9 July 2009, II PK 46/09, LEX 533035.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 6 July 2011, II PK 13/11, LEX 952560.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 24 February 2012, II PK 143/11, LEX 1217883.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 29 November 2012, II PK 116/12, LEX 1294659.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 28 August 2013, I PK 48/13, LEX 1448689.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 20 December 2013, II PK 81/13, LEX 1438800.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 20 January 2016, II PK 311/14, LEX 1974078.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 28 October 2018, II PK 188/17, LEX 2573404.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of 6 December 2018, II PK 233/17, LEX 2590753.

Informacje

Informacje: Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej (Studies on Labour Law and Social Policy), Volume 29 (2022), Tom 29 Zeszyt 1, s. 73 - 83

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

Effects of external whistleblowing in Poland

Angielski:

Effects of external whistleblowing in Poland

Autorzy

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8669-452X

Łucja Kobroń-Gąsiorowska
Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
ul. Podchorążych 2, 30-084 Kraków, Polska
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8669-452X Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
ul. Podchorążych 2, 30-084 Kraków, Polska

Publikacja: 31.03.2022

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: CC BY  ikona licencji

Udział procentowy autorów:

Łucja Kobroń-Gąsiorowska (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski

Liczba wyświetleń: 761

Liczba pobrań: 410

<p> Effects of external whistleblowing in Poland</p>