The New Ambitions of Turkey for a Multivector Policy in a Pluralist World
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEData publikacji: 21.11.2024
Studia Środkowoeuropejskie i Bałkanistyczne, 2024, Tom XXXIII, s. 271 - 286
https://doi.org/10.4467/2543733XSSB.24.015.20039Autorzy
The New Ambitions of Turkey for a Multivector Policy in a Pluralist World
The paper attempts to find an answer to the question of how a successful multivector policy by Turkey would be possible in today’s world of escalating global conflicts. This seems to have been bequeathed by Atatürk, and one could say that RT Erdogan’s mission is to achieve it and pass it on to his successors. This policy helped at the beginning of the Turkish Revolution to defeat foreign troops and establish a secular democratic republic. In the last two decades, it has become possible again in the conditions of the world’s development from a unipolar to a multipolar world. Thanks to this, Turkey can solve its most important national security problems, such as curbing Kurdish intentions for independence and conducting a nationally responsible policy with all its neighbors and especially with the major geopolitical powers. One can say that Turkey’s influence on decisions and actions in the field of security in several regions is testimony to the trend of its transformation from a regional to a great power. Successes in this regard are based on the consistent and uncompromising policy in defense of one’s own national interests, the successful finding of allies in the direction of the “geopolitical wind” and the understanding of the mutual complementarity of various political and economic processes. This analysis has been carried out through the methodology of the theory of regional security complexes.
Androlova K., Nakude shte trugne Turciya sled izborite, in: Politicheski nekorektno, 2023. https://infacto.bg/nakde-she-trgne-turciya-sled-izborite/ (date accessed: 12.01.2024).
Bouzov V., Global Conflicts and Dialogue of Civilizations from the Perspective of Southeast Europe, in: Southeast Europe: History, Culture, Politics, and Economy, D. Dimitrov, M. Palangurski, N. Hristova, V. Bouzov (eds.), Proceedings of Scientific Conference, Italy: Filodritto, 2018, pp. 63–70.
Buzan B., Waever O., Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security, Cambridge University Press 2003.
Davutoglu A., Strategicheska dalbochina. Miastoto na Turcjia v mejdunarodnite otnoshenia, Sofia: Iztok-Zapad, 2015.
Djon Keri sled prevrata: nadiavam se da ima stabilnost I priemstvenost w Turcija, //Actualno.com,16.07.2016, https://www.actualno.com/balkani/djon-keri-sled-prevrata-nadjavam-se-da-imastabilnost-i-priemstvenost-v-turcija-news_551010.html (date accessed: 10.01.2024).
Kanalat na Erdogan i riskat ot novo silno zemetresenie v Istanbul, DW, 30.06.2021, https://www.dw.-com/bg/58111430 (date accessed: 13.01.2024).
Konvencja Montre ne budet destvuvat na kanal Stambul, zajavil Erdogan, RIA Novosti, 14.04.2021, https://ria.ru/20210414/kanal-1728272832.html (date accessed: 20.09.2023).
Ercan P. (ed.), Turkish Foreign Policy: International Relations, Legality and Global Reach, Palgrave Macmillan 2017.
Grace J., What was the Black Sea grain deal and why did it collapse?, “Guardian” 20.07.2023, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/20/what-was-the-black-sea-grain-deal-and-whydid-it-collapse (date accessed: 15.01.2024).
Hamilton G., Mangott D., Preface, in: G. Hamilton, D. Mangott (eds.), The Wider Black Sea Zone in the 21th Century: Strategic, Economic and Energy Perspectives, Center for Transatlantic Relations, Johns Hopkins University 2008, pp. v-1.
Huntington S., The Clash of Civilizations and Remaking of World Order, New York: Simon&Schuster, 1996.
Kakvo е Kanal Istanbul? Harakteristiki i cena na proekta [What is Istanbul Chanel? Characteristics and Praise of the Project], “Rayhaber” 26.07.2020, https://bg.rayhaber.com/2020/07/kanalistanbul-nedir-kanal-istanbul-projesinin-ozellikleri-ve-maliyet/ (date accessed: 22.01.2024).
Informacje: Studia Środkowoeuropejskie i Bałkanistyczne, 2024, Tom XXXIII, s. 271 - 286
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
The St. Cyril and St. Methodius University of Veliko Turnovo, Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria
Publikacja: 21.11.2024
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY
Udział procentowy autorów:
Informacje o autorze:
Vihren Bouzov is a Professor of Philosophy of Law and Logic at “St. Cyril and St. Methodius” University of Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria. Member of International Society of Universal Dialogue and Bulgarian Philosophical Society. Dean of its Faculty of Philosophy (2003–2011) and since 2018 he has been a Vice-Rector for Quality Assurance and Accreditation. He has coordinated a numer international and national scientific projects. Prof. Bouzov teaches courses of lectures on Logic, Culture of Thinking and Philosophy of Law for philosophy and law-students and Crises of Regional Security for security students. He has many publications in English in the fields of Legal Philosophy, Security Studies and Logic in Bulgaria, Romania, Poland, Italy and other countries.
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 42
Liczba pobrań: 23