The Articulated Involvement of Stakeholders in Social Innovation Research. The CHILD-UP approach
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTE
The Articulated Involvement of Stakeholders in Social Innovation Research. The CHILD-UP approach
Wybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEThe Articulated Involvement of Stakeholders in Social Innovation Research. The CHILD-UP approach
Data publikacji: 31.12.2021
Studia Migracyjne – Przegląd Polonijny, 2021 (XLVII), Nr 4 (182), s. 205-218
https://doi.org/10.4467/25444972SMPP.21.059.14812Autorzy
The Articulated Involvement of Stakeholders in Social Innovation Research. The CHILD-UP approach
The article focuses on the role of stakeholder involvement in social innovation research, exploring the reasons, strategies and difficulties associated with the dialogue between researchers and stakeholders. More than an original research article, it has the modest ambition of making a contribution to the current debate on the role of stakeholders in social research, based on the approach and results to date of an ongoing research project on the integration of migrant children, CHILD-UP, funded by the EU Horizon 2020 Programme in the period 2019–2022. In contrast to major contributions that focus on the relationship between researchers and policymakers, this article refers to many different categories of stakeholders, some of which are only active at the level of grassroots practice. Rather than focusing on the direct relation between researchers and decision makers, CHILD-UP has adopted a broader, predominantly bottom-up approach to how research results can influence current practices and future policies.
After a general introduction referring to mainstream contributions on the subject, the articulated and decentralised approach of the CHILD-UP Project is described and discussed in the central part of the article. The purpose of this part is not to present the project in itself, but to illustrate how the general approach to stakeholder involvement has been translated into structures and activities that are considered an integral part of the research project.
The final sections report results of interviews with project researchers and build on formative evaluation exercises conducted as the project has concluded its first two years of activity. According to these conclusions, the dialogue between researchers and stakeholders, although recognised as necessary and useful, it still has to overcome a number of difficulties of different nature and requires further efforts to produce all its potential benefits.
Balatcheff, N. and Ludvigson, S. (2007), Kaleidoscope Impact and lessons learned – A position paper, hal-00592671; http://telearn.noe_kaleidoscope.org/warehouse/KalPartBfinal_(oo1771v1).pdf.
Blok, V., Hoffmans L.and Wubben E.F.M. (2015), Stakeholder engagement for responsible innovation in the private sector: critical issues and management practices, “Journal on Chain and Network Science”, vol. 15(2), pp. 147–164.
Borst R., Maarten, A.J., Koka, O., O’Shea, C., Pokhrel, S, Jones, T.H., Boaz, A. (2019), Envisioning and shaping translation of knowledge into action: A comparative case-study of stakeholder engagement in the development of a European tobacco control tool, in Health Policy, pp. 917, 918.
Boswell, C. (2009), The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policy and Social Research, Cambridge University Press.
Chochoy, N. (2015), Médiation entre acteurs de la recherche et acteurs économiques: originalité des pratiques de recherche et de transfert de l’Institut Godin, “Sociologies pratiques”, vol: 31, no. 2, pp. 75–84.
Entzinger, H. Scholten, P. (2013), The interplay of knowledge production and policymaking – A comparative analysis of research and policy-making on migrant integration in Germany and the Netherlands, “Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis”, published online September.
Favell, A. (2003), Integration nations: The nation-state and research on immigrants in Western Europe, “Comparative Social Research”, 22, pp. 13–42.
Mohr, J., Spekman, R. (1994), Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication Behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques, “Strategic Management Journal”, 15, 135–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.425015020.
Osorio, Fernay et al. (2020), Shaping a Public Innovation Laboratory in Bogotà: Learning through Time, Space and Stakeholders, “Journal of Innovation Economics and Management”, vol. 31, no.1, pp. 69–100.
Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., Miller, D. T. (2008), Rediscovering social innovation, “Stanford Social Innovation Review”, 6(4), pp. 34–43.
Segarra-Ona, Peiró‐Signes, A., Albors‐Garrigós, J., De Miguel‐Molina, B. (2017), Testing the Social Innovation Construct: An Empirical Approach to Align Socially Oriented Objectives, Stakeholder Engagement, and Environmental Sustainability, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, no. 24, pp. 15–27.
Scholten, P., Entzinger, H., Penninx, R., Verbeek, S. (2015), (Eds.), Integrating Immigrants in Europe-Research-Policy Dialogues, IMSOE Research Series, Springer Open.
Traenhardt, D., Bommes, M. (2010), (Eds), National Paradigms of migration research, Goettingen, V&R Unipress.
Von Schomberg, R. (2013), A vision of responsible research and innovation, in: R. Owen, M. Heintz and J Bessant (eds.) Responsible Innovation. Wiley, New York, pp. 51–74.
Von Schomberg, R. (2009), Organising Collective Responsibility: On Precaution, Code of Conduct and Understanding Public Debate, European Commission, DG Research.
Wimmer, A. and Glick Schiller, N. (2002), Methodological nationalism and beyond: National-state building, migration and the social sciences, “Global Networks”, pp. 301–334.
Informacje: Studia Migracyjne – Przegląd Polonijny, 2021 (XLVII), Nr 4 (182), s. 205-218
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
International Institute of Humanitarian Law
International Institute of Humanitarian Law
European School Heads Association
Forum of European Regions for Research, Education and Training (FREREF)
Forum of European Regions for Research, Education and Training (FREREF)
Publikacja: 31.12.2021
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 579
Liczba pobrań: 514