FAQ

Museums and the Traps of Social Media: The Case of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial and Museum

Data publikacji: 2020

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2020, 2/2020 (6), s. 223 - 250

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.20.017.13020

Autorzy

Ewa Manikowska
Institute of Art, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6633-823X Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Tytuły

Museums and the Traps of Social Media: The Case of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial and Museum

Abstrakt

In this article I discuss both the recent threats as well as opportunities posed by social media to the activities of museums, taking into account social media’s importance as an evolving space of both social outreach and social activism. Recalling the controversies around the U.S. and UK museums’ social media responses to George Floyd’s death, I argue that museums run the risk of politicization and entanglement in controversial issues which are not necessarily linked to their profile and mission. I analyse museums’ social media guidelines, good practices, and mission statements, and posit that they play a fundamental role in integrating the new realm of the Web 2.0 into traditional museum activities. My main case study and example of good practice is the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial and Museum. It has constantly embedded general ethical and educational principles and guidelines of Holocaust commemoration and education into its more than 60-years’ experience in dealing with and taming political and cultural controversies surrounding this memory site of universal importance, and this embeddedness lies at the core of its social media activity. Defined as an “online community of remembrance”, it consists of well-thought-out initiatives which aim at informing the public about the everyday history of the camp, involving itself in the current commemorations and anniversaries, and rectifying simplifications and misinformation about Auschwitz and the Holocaust. I also analyse the fundamental role played by the official social media profiles in managing the crisis which arose at the beginning of 2018 with the amendment of the socalled “Holocaust Law” in Poland.

Bibliografia

Anderson M. et al., Activism in the Social Media Age, 11 July 2018, https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/07/11/activism-in-the-social-media-age/ [accessed: 10.09.2020].
 
Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial and Museum, 70th Anniversary of the Extermination of Jews from Hungary. Living Community of Memory On-line, 24 April 2014, http://auschwitz.org/en/museum/news/70th-anniversary-of-extermination-of-jews-from-hungary-living-community-of-memory-on-line-,1072.html [accessed: 10.09.2020].
 
Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial and Museum, E-learning, http://auschwitz.org/en/education/e-learning/ [accessed: 10.09.2020].
 
Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial and Museum, Master Plan for Preservation, http://ftp.auschwitz.org/en/museum/preservation/master-plan-for-preservation [accessed: 10.09.2020].
 
Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial and Museum, Mission Statement, http://70.auschwitz.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=76&Itemid=173&lang=en [accessed: 10.09.2020].
 
Baggesen R.H., Augmenting the Agora: Media and Civic Engagement in Museums, “MediaKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research” 2014, Vol. 30.
 
British Museum, Social Media Code of Conduct, https://www.britishmuseum.org/terms-use/social-media-code-conduct [accessed: 10.09.2020].
 
Brown K., ‘This Is Performative’: Critics Mercilessly Mock the British Museum for Its ‘Hollow’ Statement of Solidarity with the Black Live Matter Movement, “Artnet News”, 9 June 2020,
https://news.artnet.com/art-world/british-museum-black-lives-matter-1882296 [accessed: 20.09.2020].
 
Bucholc M., Komornik M., The Polish ‘Holocaust Law’ Revisited: The Devastating Effects of Prejudice-Mongering, “Cultures of History Forum”, 19 February 2019, https://www.cultures-of-history.uni-jena.de/politics/poland/the-polish-holocaust-law-revisited-
the-devastating-effects-of-prejudice-mongering/ [accessed: 10.09.2020].
 
Carly Ch., Russia and Poland are Playing Political Games with the Holocaust, “The Washington Post”, 23 January 2020, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/01/23/russia-poland-are-playing-political-games-with-holocaust/ [accessed: 10.08.2020].
 
Charr M., How Have Museums Responded to the Black Live Matters Protests?, “MuseumNext”, 20 June 2020, https://www.museumnext.com/article/how-have-museums-responded-to-the-black-lives-matter-protests/ [accessed: 10.09.2020].
 
Declaration of the Stockholm International Forum on the Holocaust, 26–28 January 2000, https://tandis.odihr.pl/bitstream/20.500.12389/19314/1/00576.pdf [accessed: 10.09.2020].
 
Edson M., Fast, Open and Transparent. Developing the Smithsonian’s Web and New Media Strategy, in: J. Trant, D. Bearman (eds.), Museums and the Web 2010: Proceedings, Archives & Museum Informatics, Toronto 2010, https://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2010/papers/edson/edson.html [accessed: 10.09.2020].
 
Fink J., Auschwitz Museum Calls for Education after “Hurtful” TikTok Holocaust “Victim” Videos Posted, “Newsweek”, 27 August 2020, https://www.newsweek.com/auschwitz-museum-calls-education-after-hurtful-tiktok-holocaust-victim-videos-posted-1528116 [accessed: 10.09.2020].
 
Flynn N., The Social Media Handbook. Rules, Policies and Best Practices to Successfully Manage Your Organization’s Social Media Presence, Posts and Potential, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken 2012.
 
Greenberger A., Solomon T., Major U.S. Museums Criticized for Responses to Ongoing George Floyd Protests, “ArtNews”, 2 June 2020, https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/museums-controversy-george-floyd-protests-1202689494/ [accessed: 10.09.2020].
 
Harris G., ‘Racist’ Gallery in Liverpool Museum to be Overhauled in Light of Black Life Matters, “The Art Newspaper”, 13 July 2020, https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/racist-liverpool-museum-gallery-to-be-reconfigured-in-light-of-black-lives-matter [accessed: 20.09.2020].
 
Hicks D., The Brutish Museum. The Benin Bronzes, Colonial Violence and Cultural Restitution, Pluto Press, London 2020 [forthcoming].
 
Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, Using Social Media in Holocaust Education, https://www.holocaustremembrance.com/educational-materials/using-social-media-holocaust-education [accessed: 20.09.2020].
 
Huener J., Auschwitz, Poland and the Politics of Commemoration, 1945-1979, Ohio University Press, Athens 2003.
 
Huener J., From Liberation to Memorialization. The Transformation of the Auschwitz Site 1945-1947, “Pro Memoria” 2007, Vol. 7.
 
J. Paul Getty Trust, J. Paul Getty Trust Social Media Policy, September 2019, https://www.getty.edu/staff/forms/socialmedia.pdf [accessed: 10.09.2020].
 
Janes R.R., Sandell R. (eds.), Museum Activism, Routledge, London 2019.
 
Jenoff P.R., Managing Memory: The Legal Status of Auschwitz-Birkenau and Resolution of Conflicts in the Post-Communist Era, “The Polish Review” 2001, Vol. 46.
 
Kendall Adams G., Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum Suffers Wave of Abuse Following New Law, “Museums Association News”, 14 May 2018, https://www.museumsassociation.org/museums-journal/news/14052018-auschwitz-birkenau-wave-of-abuse [accessed: 10.09.2020].
 
Klauziński S., W polskiej pamięci o wojnie Auschwitz kilka razy ważniejsze niż Powstanie Warszawskie i Katyń [In the Polish Memory of the War Auschwitz Is Several Times More Important than the Warsaw Uprising and Katyn], “OkoPress”, 17 January 2020, https://oko.press/w-polskiej-pamieci-o-wojnie-auschwitz-kilka-razy-wazniejsze-nizpowstanie-warszawskie-i-katyn/ [accessed: 10.09.2020].
 
Kucia M., Auschwitz jako fakt społeczny: historia, współczesność i świadomość społeczna [Auschwitz as a Social Fact: History, Modernity and Social Awareness], Universitas, Kraków 2005.
 
Kucia M., The Europeanization of Holocaust Memory in Eastern Europe, “East European Politics and Societies” 2016, Vol. 30.
 
Mandarano N., Musei e media digitali, Carocci Editore, Roma 2019.
 
Marshall A., To Protest Colonialism, He Takes Artifacts from Museums, “The New York Times”, 21 September 2020, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/21/arts/design/france-museum-quai-branly.html [accessed: 10.10.2020].
 
Massara K., Environmental Activists Focus on Museums that Take Oil Money, “The New York Times”, 9 October 2018, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/09/business/environmental-activists-take-on-oil-money.html [accessed: 20.09.2020].
 
Michlic J.B., ‘At the Crossroads’: Jedwabne and Polish Historiography of the Holocaust, “Dapim: Studies on the Holocaust” 2017, Vol. 31.
 
Mihr A., Cyber Justice. Human Rights and Good Governance for the Internet, Springer, Berlin 2017.
 
Mihr A., Why Holocaust Education is not Always Human Rights Education?, “Journal of Human Rights” 2015, Vol. 14.
 
Palmer E., Holocaust Survivors are Repeatedly Asking Mark Zuckerberg to Ban Denial on Facebook, “Newsweek”, 29 July 2020, https://www.newsweek.com/holocaust-denial-banned-facebook-survivors-1521039 [accessed: 20.09.2020].
 
Państwowe Muzeum Auschwitz-Birkenau, Fake newsy pojawiają się także w obszarze Pamięci [Fake News Also Affect the Area of Memory], 10 June 2019, http://auschwitz.org/muzeum/aktualnosci/fake-newsy-pojawiaja-sie-takze-w-obszarze-pamieci,1965.
html [accessed: 10.09.2020]
 
Pessach G., Shur-Ofry M., Copyright and the Holocaust, “Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities” 2018, Vol. 30.
 
Pietka B., Spory wokół liczby ofiar Auschwitz [Disputes over the Number of Auschwitz Victims], https://bohdanpietka.wordpress.com/2016/01/25/spory-wokol-liczby-ofiarauschwitz/[accessed: 10.09.2020].
 
Piper F., Auschwitz. How Many Perished Jews, Poles, Gypsies…, Frap-Books, Oświęcim 1996.
 
Randle A., We Were Tired of Asking: Why Open Letters Have Become Many Activists’ Tool of Choice for Exposing Racism at Museums, “ArtNet News”, 15 July 2020, https://news.artnet.com/art-world/museum-open-letters-activism-1894150 / [accessed:
20.09.2020].
 
Reynolds A., Circulation, Impact and the Use of Twitter in Contemporary Museum Activism, “Participations, Journal of Audience & Reception Studies” 2020, Vol. 17.
 
Ross M., Interpreting the New Museology, “Museums and Society” 2004, Vol. 2.
 
Röttjer J., Safeguarding “Negative Historical Values” for the Future? Appropriating the Past in the UNESCO Cultural World Heritage Site Auschwitz-Birkenau, “Ab Imperio” 2015, Vol. 4.
 
Russo A. et al., Participatory Communication via Social Media, “Curator. The Museum Journal” 2008, Vol. 51.
 
Shaw A., Harris G., Art World Presses Pause for #BlackOutTuesday, “The Art Newspaper”, 2 June 2020, https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/art-world-presses-pause-forblackouttuesday [accessed: 20.08.2020].
 
Smithsonian Institution, Office of the Inspector General, Use of Social Media: Report Number A-11-01, 28 September 2011, https://www.si.edu/Content/OIG/Audits/2011/A-11-01.pdf [accessed: 10.09.2020].
 
Smithsonian Institution, SITP Strategic Overview, 14 February 2011, https://soar.si.edu/sites/default/files/reports/2015.sp.ocio.pdf [accessed: 20.09.2020].
 
Smithsonian Institution, Smithsonian Directive 609: Digital Asset Access and Use, 19 December 2019, https://www.si.edu/content/pdf/about/sd/SD609.pdf [accessed: 10.09.2020].
 
Smithsonian Institution, Smithsonian Directive 814: Management of Official Smithsonian Social Media Accounts, 27 June 2019, https://www.si.edu/content/pdf/about/sd/SD-814.pdf [accessed: 10.09.2020].
 
Smithsonian Institution, Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 2010–2015. Inspiring Generations through Knowledge and Discovery, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED583517.pdf [accessed: 10.09.2020].
 
Smithsonian Institution, Strategic Plan: Smithsonian 2022, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED583523.pdf [accessed: 10.09.2020].
 
Spilberger D., How the Auschwitz Memorial’s Twitter Account Became the Internet’s Holocaust’s Fact Checker, “The Insider”, 27 January 2020, https://www.insider.com/auschwitz-memorial-museum-twitter-internet-holocaust-fact-checker-paul-sawicki-2020-1 [accessed: 20.09.2020].
 
Spruce L., Leaf K., Social Media for Social Justice, “Journal of Museum Education” 2017, Vol. 42.
 
Stola D., Poland’s Institute of National Remembrance: A Ministry of Memory?, in: M. Lipman, A. Miller (eds.), The Convulsions of Historical Politics, CEU Press, Budapest 2012.
 
The Holocaust, Anti-Semitism and Racism: European Parliament Resolution on Remembrance of the Holocaust, Anti-Semitism and Racism, OJ C 253E, 13.10.2005, p. 37.
 
UNESCO, OSCE, Addressing Anti-Semitism through Education. Guidelines for Policymakers, Paris–Warsaw 2018, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000263702 [accessed: 20.09.2020].
 
United Nations General Assembly, Resolution 60/7: Holocaust Remembrance, 1 November 2005, A/RES/60/7, https://undocs.org/A/RES/60/7 [accessed: 24.10.2020].
 
United Nations General Assembly, Resolution 70/1: Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 25 September 2015, A/RES/70/1, https://undocs.org/A/RES/70/1 [accessed: 20.09.2020].
 
Ustawa z dnia 2 lipca 1947 r. o upamiętnieniu męczeństwa narodu polskiego i innych narodów w Oświęcimiu [Law of 2 July 1947 Regarding the Commemoration of Martyrdom of the Polish Nation and Other Nations in Oświęcim], Dziennik Ustaw 1947 No. 52 item 265.
 
Wellers G., Essai de détermination du nombre des morts au camp d’Auschwitz [An Attempt to Determine the Number of Victims of Auschwitz], “Le Monde Juif” 1983.
 
Wong A., Social Media Towards Social Change: Potential and Challenges for Museums, in: R. Sandell, E. Nightingale (eds.), Museums Equality and Social Justice, Routledge, London 2012.
 
Wong A.S., Ethical Issues of Social Media in Museums: A Case Study, “Museum Management and Curatorship” 2011, Vol. 26.
 
World Jewish Congress, Anti-Semitic Symbols and Holocaust Denial in Social Media Posts, January 2018, https://www.worldjewishcongress.org/download/3KVjYgi8FNOTxdWd5HeFPw?utm_source=PRESS&utm_campaign=3d806f4ab8-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_02_08&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_c3b21e69b1-3d806f4ab8-&utm_source=WJC+Mailing+Lists&utm_campaign=78bfed156d-EMAIL _CAMPAIGN_2018_02_08&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_04292c525e-78bfed15
6d-318920277 [accessed: 20.09.2020].
 
Wóycicka Z., Arrested Mourning: Memory of the Nazi Camps in Poland 1944-1950, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Mein 2013.

Informacje

Informacje: Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2020, 2/2020 (6), s. 223 - 250

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

Museums and the Traps of Social Media: The Case of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial and Museum

Angielski:

Museums and the Traps of Social Media: The Case of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial and Museum

Autorzy

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6633-823X

Ewa Manikowska
Institute of Art, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6633-823X Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Institute of Art, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw (Poland)

Publikacja: 2020

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND  ikona licencji

Udział procentowy autorów:

Ewa Manikowska (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski