Target backcloth sprawcy, długość serii i dokładność profilowania geograficznego. Symulacyjna analiza target backcloth sprawcy, długości serii i dokładności profilowania geograficznego
Wybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTETarget backcloth, series length, and the accuracy of geographic profiling. Simulation analysis of target backcloth, series length, and the accuracy of geographic profiling
Data publikacji: 29.03.2022
Problems of Forensic Sciences (Z Zagadnień Nauk Sądowych), 2021, 126-127, s. 101-120
https://doi.org/10.4467/12307483PFS.20.006.15446Autorzy
Target backcloth, series length, and the accuracy of geographic profiling. Simulation analysis of target backcloth, series length, and the accuracy of geographic profiling
The main aim of this research was to establish a minimum series length when crime opportunities are not distributed at random. In addition, the behaviour of two methods of assessing the accuracy of a geographic profiling algorithms were analysed. The second objective was to analyse the existence and properties of the buffer zone in the created model. For the purpose of this research, a simulation was used. Data showed significantly different behaviour in the two tested methods of assessing the accuracy of geographic profiling, with hit score percentage being the significantly more sensitive measurement. The tests allowed all of the effects attributed to the buffer zone to be obtained, despite the fact that it was not included in the model itself. For series as long as nine offences accuracy in non-random conditions was similar to series length five and uniform distribution of opportunities.
1. Bernasco, W. (2009). Modeling micro-level crime location choice: Application of the discrete choice framework to crime at places. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(1), 113–138. DOI: 10.1007/s10940-009-9086-6.
2. Bernasco, W., Block, R. (2009). Where offenders choose to attack: A discrete choice model of robberies in Chicago. Criminology, 47(1):, 93–130. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00140.x.
3. Brantingham, P. L., Brantingham, P. J. (1991). Environmental criminology. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
4. Canter, D., Larkin, P. (1993). The environmental range of serial rapists. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(1), 63–69. DOI: 10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80215-4.
5. Canter, D. V., Coffey, T., Huntley, M., Missen, C. (2000). Predicting serial killers’ home base using a decision support system. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, 457–478.
6. Canter, D., Hammond, L. (2006). A comparison of the efficacy of different decay functions in geographical profiling for a sample of Us serial killers. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 3(2), 91–103. DOI: 10.1002/jip.45.
7. Canter, D. V., Youngs, D. (2008). Applications of geographical offender profiling. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
8. Chainey, S., Ratcliffe, J. (2008). GIS and crime mapping. Chichester: Wiley.
9. Górski, M. (2021). The accuracy of geographic profiling methods based on the example of burglaries in Warsaw. Problems of Forensic Sciences, 125, 51–65.
10. Hammond, L., Youngs, D. (2011). Decay functions and criminal spatial processes: Geographical offender profiling of volume crime. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8(1), 90–102. DOI: 10.1002/jip.132.
11. Levine, N. (2000). Crimestat: A spatial statistics program for the analysis of crime incident locations (version 1.1). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
12. Levine, N., Block, R. (2011). Bayesian journey-to-crime estimation: An improvement in geographic profiling methodology. The Professional Geographer, 63(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2010.547152.
13. Lundrigan, S., Czarnomski, S., Wilson, M. (2010). Spatial and environmental consistency in serial sexual assault. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7(1), 15–30. DOI: 10.1002/jip.100.
14. O’Leary, M. (2011). Modeling criminal distance decay. Cityscape, 13(3), 161–198. Retrieved June 19, 2017 from https://www.huduser.gov/portal/periodicals/cityscpe/vol13num3/Cityscape_Nov2011_Modelling_Criminal.pdf.
15. Rengert, G. F. (1996). The geography of illegal drugs. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
16. Rengert, G. F., Piquero, A. R., Jones, P. R. (1999). Distance decay reexamined. Criminology,7(2), 427–446. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00492.x.
17. Rich, T., Shively, M. (2004). A methodology for evaluating geographic profiling software. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates inc. Retrieved June 18, 2017 from https:// www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/208993.pdf.
18. Rossmo, D. K. (2000). Geographic profiling. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
19. Rossmo, D. K. (2005). Geographic heuristics or shortcuts to failure? Response to snook et al. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(5), 651–654. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1144.
20. Snook, B., Taylor, P. J., Bennell, C. (2005). shortcuts to geographic profiling success: A reply to Rossmo (2005). Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(5), 655–661. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1142.
21. Wickham, H. (2009). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer Verlag.
Informacje: Problems of Forensic Sciences (Z Zagadnień Nauk Sądowych), 2021, 126-127, s. 101-120
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Target backcloth, series length, and the accuracy of geographic profiling. Simulation analysis of target backcloth, series length, and the accuracy of geographic profiling
Kolegium Międzywydziałowych Indywidualnych Studiów Matematyczno-Przyrodniczych, Uniwersytet Warszawski
Publikacja: 29.03.2022
Otrzymano: 16.07.2020
Zaakceptowano: 17.12.2021
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
Angielski, Polski