Historyczne pojęcie filozofii edukacji
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEHistorical Concept of Philosophy of Education
Data publikacji: 20.06.2019
Filozoficzne Problemy Edukacji, 2019, Volume 2 (2019), s. 93 - 109
https://doi.org/10.4467/25450948FPE.19.006.10960Autorzy
Historical Concept of Philosophy of Education
The article attempts to determine the historical concept of philosophy of education on the basis of common features analysis along with identification the historical continuity in the prominent philosophers’ views on education. The analysis of the contexts in which the philosophy of education has functioned in the history of philosophy leads to negative results in the first approximation, since in each of them only a certain point of philosophy of education concept is noticeable. So, for example, some thinkers defined the value in human life as ethical education, others – gave preference to logical knowledge; some philosophers emphasized the necessity of self-cognition, others – insisted on the importance of the world cognition. Because of this, from the historical perspective, philosophy of education should be equated with all the diversity of its representations, because each of them, although isn’t sufficient, but is important for definition. That is, all the philosophical thinking expressions, based near the concept “education”, are philosophy of education subject. However, if we talk in depth, the same tendency is appearing in the historical context of philosophy: the understanding of education as assistance to a person in self-realization. In the history of philosophy, there is no noticeable restriction of education by any framework or norms. There is only emphasizing the needs to create opportunities for the practice of freedom to act, because a person needs to create his or her whole life in order to form own world view and outline own moral ideal. That demands from a person a constant attention to his or her own personality and the perfect ability to think critically. Philosophers are united by the idea that education is a human existence indispensable foundation. That is why in different historical circumstances they did not deny the values of individual sciences in human life, but insisted on the importance that it has for science that can form its personality.So, the philosophical content of education is the approach of a person to spiritualperfection.
Adorno Т. (2017). Th e Th eory of Half-education. Філософія освіти. “Philosophy of Education”, no. 1 (20), p. 128–152; https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2017-20-1-128-152 (accessed: 12.08.2019) [In Ukrainian].
Aristotle (1934). Nicomachean Ethics. W. Heinemann, G.P. Putnam’s sons, London–New York; http://data.perseus.org/catalog/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg010.perseus-eng1 (accessed: 15.12.2017).
Aristotle (1989). Metaphysics. London–Cambridge; http://data.perseus.org/catalog/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg025 (accessed: 15.12.2017).
Ciceronis M.T. (1557). Tusculanae quaestiones. LVGDVNI, APVD IOAN. TORNAESIVM ET GVL. CAZEIVM. M. D. LVII; https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_rLVxsu8DansC/page/n3 (accessed: 12.08.2019).
Curren R. (2003). Introduction, in: R. Curren (ed.), A Companion to Philosophy of Education. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, UK, p. 1–4.
Dewey J. (1909). Moral Principles in Education. Printed in the U.S.A, Cambridge, Massachusetts; http://www.gutenberg.org/files/25172/25172-h/25172-h.htm (accessed: 12.08.2019).
Dewey J. (1916). Democracy and Education; https://www.fulltextarchive.com/page/Democracy-and-Education1/ (accessed: 10.10.2017).
Dilthey W. (1921). Das Wesen der Philosophie, in: W. Dilthey, A. Riehl, W. Wundt, H. Ebbinghaus, R. Eucken, Br. Bauch, Th . Litt, M. Geiger, T.K. Oesterreich (eds.), Systematische Philosophie, Dritte Durchgesehene Aufl age, p. 1–67. Verlag und Druck von B.G. Teubner, Berlin und Leipzig; https://archive.org/details/SystematischePhilosophie/page/n4 (accessed: 12.08.2019).
Dilthey W. (1924a). Schulreformen und Schulstuben, in: W. Dilthey, Gesammelte Schrift en. Die geistige Welt: Einleitung in die Philosophie des Lebens, vol. 6, p. 83–88. Verlag von B.G. Teubner, Leipzig und Berlin; https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k69442d/f93.image (accessed: 12.08.2019).
Dilthey W. (1924b). Über die Möglichkeit einer Allgemeingültigen Pädagogischen Wissenschaft , in: W. Dilthey, Gesammelte Schrift en. Die geistige Welt: Einleitung in die Philosophie des Lebens, vol. 6, p. 56–82. Verlag von B.G. Teubner, Leipzig und Berlin; https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k69442d/f66.image (accessed: 12.08.2019).
Foucault М. (2008). About Genealogy of Ethics: Review of Current Work. “Logos”, no. 2 (65), p. 135–158; http://www.intelros.ru/pdf/logos_02_2008/06.pdf (accessed: 12.08.2019) [In Russian].
Frankena W. (1965). Th ree Historical Philosophies of Education. Aristotle, Kant, Dewey. Scott, Foresman and Company, Chicago–Atlanta–Dallas–Palo Alto–Fair Lawn–New York; https://archive.org/details/WilliamFrankena1965ThreeHistoricalPhilosophiesOfEducationAristotleKantDewey (accessed: 12.08.2019).
Hadot P. (1999). What is Ancient Philosophy?. Humanitarian literature publishing, Moscow [In Russian].
Honcharenko O. (2017). Yakym Yarema’s Philosophical and Pedagogical Ideas in Discursive Practices of Education. “Kultura – Społeczeństwo – Edukacja”, no. 2 (12), р. 313–327. doi 10.14746/kse.2017.12.15
Jaeger W. (1997). Paideia. Th e Ideals of Greek Culture. “Greec-Latin cabinet” Y.А. Shichalina, Moscow [In Russian].
Janack M. (2001). Dewey, John, in: E.V. Taylor, C.E. Winquist (eds.), Encyclopedia of Postmodernism. Routledge, London–New York, p. 94–95.
Kant I. (1803). Über Pädagogik. Friedrich Nicolovius, Königsberg; https://archive.org/details/berpdagogik00kant/page/n2 (accessed: 12.08.2019).
Kant І. (1989). An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment?. “Universe”, no. 4, р. 135–138 [In Ukrainian].
Kultaieva М. (2017). Th e Education and its Deformations in the Contemporary Culture: A Contribution to the Actuality Theodor W. Adorno’s Theory of Half-educaton. “Філософія освіти. Philosophy of Education”, no. 1 (20), р. 153–195. doi https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2017-20-1-153-195 [In Ukrainian].
Montaigne М. (2005а). On the Education of Children, in: М. Montaigne, Essais. Book fi rst. DUKH I LITERA, Kyiv, p. 161–196 [In Ukrainian].
Montaigne М. (2005b). About bakaliarstvo, in: М. Montaigne, Essais. Book fi rst. DUKH I LITERA, Kyiv, p.149–160 [In Ukrainian].
Phillips D.C., Siegel H. (2018). Philosophy of Education, in: E.N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/education-philosophy/ (accessed: 12.08.2019).
Plato (1935). Republic. Plato in Twelve Volumes, vols. 5–6. Harvard University Press, W. Heinemann Ltd., Cambridge, Mass–London; http://catalog.perseus.org/catalog/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg030.perseus-eng1 (accessed: 10.10.2018).
Plato (1966a). Apology. Plato in Twelve Volumes, vol. 1. Harvard University Press, W. Heinemann Ltd., Cambridge, Mass–London; http://catalog.perseus.org/catalog/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg002.perseus-eng1 (accessed: 10.10.2018).
Plato (1966b). Phaedo. Plato in Twelve Volumes, vol. 1. Harvard University Press, W. Heinemann Ltd., Cambridge, Mass–London; http://catalog.perseus.org/catalog/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg004.perseus-eng1 (accessed: 10.10.2018).
Seneca (1999). Moral Letters to Lucilius. Osnovy, Kyiv; http://ae-lib.org.ua/texts/seneca__ad_lucilium_epistularum_moralium__ua.htm (accessed: 12.10.2018) [In Ukrainian].
Sloterdijk P. (2015). You Must Change Your Life (excerpts of work). “Philosophical Th ought”, no. 2, р. 95–106 [In Ukrainian].
Tatarkiewicz W. (2006). History of Philosophy, vol. 1: Ancient Philosophy and Medieval Philosophy. Svichado, Lviv [In Ukrainian].
Informacje: Filozoficzne Problemy Edukacji, 2019, Volume 2 (2019), s. 93 - 109
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Historical Concept of Philosophy of Education
National Academy of State Border Service of Ukraine
Publikacja: 20.06.2019
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
Angielski