“Satysfakcjonujące, ale wymagające” – zarządzanie dokumentacją w Szwecji w okresie transformacji
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEData publikacji: 06.12.2024
Archeion, 2024, 125, s. 160 - 201
https://doi.org/10.4467/26581264ARC.24.011.20700Autorzy
“Fulfilling, but demanding” – Swedish recordkeeping in transition
In recent decades, records management has undergone profound changes due to technological developments as well as political and organisational changes. The global view shows considerable diversity, not only between legal and administrative systems based on common law, such as those in the UK, North America and Australia, but also between systems operating under civil law. Sweden represents a special case of a civil law system, the so-called Nordic model. The purpose of this study, based on three case studies, is to analyse the recordkeeping functions in contemporary government agencies in Sweden, their responsibilities, competences and the role they play. Study findings show that most of the functions defined in international standards are implemented by Swedish government agencies, but at different levels and with different outcomes. Furthermore, there are significant differences between them, which may stem from intraorganisational arrangements. The actual work tasks focus on implementing the strategic activities of recordkeeping, providing support in upgrading skills and acquiring new knowledge, while the more routine tasks are deprioritized.
Andreassen M., Hvem er de og hva gjør de? – arkivarene under lupen, unpublished thesis, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo 2020, https://oda.oslomet.no/oda-xmlui/handle/10642/9160 [access: 15.11.2024].
Ayres C.E., The theory of economic progress, Chapel Hill 1944.
Bhatia S., Douglas E.K., Most M., Blockchain and records management: disruptive force or new approach?, “Records Management Journal” 2020, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 277–286, https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-08-2019-0040 [access: 15.11.2024].
Brooks J., Perspectives on the relationship between records management and information governance, “Records Management Journal” 2019, vol. 29, no. 1–2, pp. 5–17, https://doi.org/10.1108/Rmj-09-2018-0032 [access: 15.11.2024].
Buchanan S.A., Stratton C., Sun Y., Chaudhary A., Survey research on tasks and competencies to inform records management education, “Records Management Journal” 2017, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 2–18, https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-11-2015-0041 [access: 15.11.2024].
Byström K., Heinström J., Ruthven I., Information at work: information management in the workplace, London 2019.
Cumming K. Recordkeeping [in:] Encyclopedia of Archival Science, eds. L. Duranti, P.C. Franks, Lanham 2015, pp. 319–323.
Duranti L., Rogers C., Trusting records in the cloud, London 2019.
Engvall T., The role of the records professional [in:] Trusting Records in the Cloud, eds. L. Duranti, C. Rogers, London 2019, pp. 223–244.
Fagerholm E., Arkivarien i informationssamhället: En komparativ kritisk diskursanalys av platsannonser för arkivarieyrket under 1980-talet och tidigt 2020-tal, unpublished thesis, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall 2021, http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-42521 [access: 15.11.2024].
Fayol H., Administration industrielle et générale: prévoyance, organisation, commandement, coordination, controle, Paris 1920.
Foscarini F., Function [in:] Encyclopedia of Archival Science, eds. L. Duranti, P.C. Franks, Lanham 2015, pp. 215–218.
Franks P.C., Implications of blockchain distributed ledger technology for records management and information governance programs, “Records Management Journal” 2020, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 287–299, https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-08-2019-0047 [access: 15.11.2024].
Gänser G., Michetti G., The Ontology of Functional Activities for Archival Systems, 2018, https://interparestrust.org/assets/public/dissemination/TR05-FinalReport-20180526.pdf [access: 15.11.2024].
Geijer U., Lövblad H., Arkivlagen: en kommentar, Stockholm 2018.
Gibbons L., Douglas J., Markers of professional identity: records management jobs advertisements in Australia, “Records Management Journal” 2021, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-03-2020-0007 [access: 15.11.2024].
Grönroos I., Yrkesroll i förändring? En studie av ett antal statsanställda arkivariers upplevelser av införandet av en verksamhetsbaserad arkivredovisning, unpublished thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala 2012, https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-197020 [access: 15.11.2024].
Hagmann J., Information governance–beyond the buzz, “Records Management Journal” 2013, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 228–240, https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-04-2013-0008 [access: 15.11.2024].
Hansen L.E., Sundqvist A., A New Function: A New Archivist? [in:] 10th European Conference on Information Systems Management: ECISM 2016, eds. P. Silva, R. Quaresma, A. Guerriro, New York 2016, pp. 76–84.
Henriksen Hagen D., The effect of digitalization on the daily use of and work with records in the Norwegian public sector, “Records Management Journal” 2023, vol. 33, no. 2–3, pp. 105–119, https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-10-2022-0030 [access: 15.11.2024].
Ilshammar L,. Offentlighetens nya rum: teknik och politik i Sverige 1969–1999, doctoral dissertation, Örebro university, Örebro 2002, https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-28 [access: 15.11.2024].
Ilshammar L., Bjurström A., Grönlund Å., Public E-Services in Sweden: Old Wine in New Bottles?, “Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems” 2005, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 11–40, https://aisel.aisnet.org/sjis/vol17/iss2/3 [access: 15.11.2024].
ISO 15489-1:2016 Information and documentation – Records management – Part 1: Concepts and principles.
Kallberg M., Archivists – A Profession in Transition?, “Professions and Professionalism” 2012, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 27–21, https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.v2i1.158 [access: 15.11.2024].
Kallberg M., Archivists 2.0: redefining the archivist’s profession in the digital age, “Records Management Journal” 2012, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 98–115, https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691211268162 [access: 15.11.2024].
Katuu S., Enterprise architecture – a value proposition for records professionals [in:] 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), 9–12 December 2019, Los Angeles, eds. C. Baru, J. Huan, L. Khan, X. Hu, R. Ak, Y. Tian, R. Barga, C. Zaniolo, K. Lee, Y. F. Ye, 2019, pp. 3116– 3125, https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData47090.2019.9006603 [access: 15.11.2024].
Katuu S., The utility of enterprise architecture to records and archives specialists [in:] 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), 10–13 December 2018, Seattle, eds. N. Abe, H. Liu, C. Pu, X. Hu, N. Ahmed, M. Qiao, Y. Song, D. Kossmann, B. Liu, K. Lee, J. Tang, J. He, J. Saltz, Piscataway 2018, pp. 2702–2710, https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2018.8622467 [access: 15.11.2024].
Kautto T., Henttonen P., Records management as invisible work: A study of Finnish municipalities, “Government Information Quarterly” 2020, vol. 37, no. 4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101460 [access: 15.11.2024].
Ketelaar E., The difference best postponed? Cultures and comparative archival science, “Archivaria” 1997, vol. 44, pp. 142–148, https://www.archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12201 [access: 15.11.2024].
Klareld A.S., Recordkeeping in an outsourcing public agency, “Records Management Journal” 2018, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 99–114, https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-02-2017-0002 [access: 15.11.2024].
Klareld A.S., “The information has moved away from home”. Conceptions about how an outsourcing policy affects public records management, “International Journal of Public Information Systems” 2017, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 22–38.
Lomas E., Information governance: information security and access within a UK context, “Records Management Journal” 2010, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 182–198, https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011064322 [access: 15.11.2024].
Löfdahl N., E-arkiv – Gäller det att positionera sig rätt? En studie om samband och orsakssamband mellan e-arkiv och en yrkesroll i förändring, samt mekanismer till orsakssambandet, unpublished thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala 2016 https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-295698 [access: 15.11.2024].
Ministry of Justice, Public access to information and secrecy. Legislation in brief, 2020, https://www.government.se/information-material/2009/09/public-access-to-information-and-secrecy-act [access: 15.11.2024].
Mutch A., Practice, substance, and history: Reframing institutional logics, “Academy of Management Review” 2018, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 242–258, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0303 [access: 15.11.2024].
Nilsson N., Arkivkunskap, Lund 1973.
Norberg E., A Nordic archival tradition, “Archival Science” 2003, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 85–95, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435652 [access: 15.11.2024].
Österberg E.E., Att styra med upphandling – staten som marknadsaktör [in:] Statlig förvaltningspolitik för 2020-talet: En forskningsantologi, eds. P. Ehn, G. Sundström, Stockholm 2020, pp. 111–128.
Pauloff A., Quist J., Centralisering och specialisering inom svensk statsförvaltning, Stockholm 2010.
Prop. 1997/98:136 Statlig förvaltning i medborgarnas tjänst [government bill 1997/98:136], https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/proposition/statlig-forvaltning-i- medborgarnas-tjanst_gl03136/html/ [access: 15.11.2024].
RA-FS 2008:4 Föreskrifter om ändring i Riksarkivets föreskrifter och allmänna råd (RA-FS 1991:1) om arkiv hos statliga myndigheter [The National Archives provision on governmental archives], https://riksarkivet.se/rafs?pdf=rafs/RA-FS%202008-04.pdf [access: 15.11.2024].
Richards L.L., Records Management in the Cloud: From System Design to Resource Ownership, “Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology” 2018, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 281–289, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23939 [access: 15.11.2024].
Rostgaard M., Bak G., The Nordic model of digital archiving, London, New York 2024.
Schellenberg T.R., Modern archives. Principles and techniques, Chicago 1956.
Scott W.R., Institutions and organizations: ideas, interests and identities, Thousand Oaks 2014.
Seo M.G., Creed W.D., Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective, “Academy of management review” 2002, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 222–247, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6588004 [access: 15.11.2024].
SFS 1949:105 Tryckfrihetsförordning [The Freedom of the press act]. SFS 1990:782 Arkivlag [The Archives act].
SFS 1991:446 Arkivförordningen [The Archives ordinance].
SFS 2007:603 Förordning om intern styrning och kontroll [The Ordinance on internal governance and control].
SFS 2009:400 Offentlighets- och sekretesslag [The Public access to information and secrecy act].
SFS 2018:218 Lag med kompletterande bestämmelser till EU:s dataskyddsförordning [Act containing supplementary provisions to the EU General Data Protection Regulation].
Shepherd E., Archival Science [in:] Encyclopedia of library and information sciences (4th ed.), eds. J.D. McDonald, M. Levine-Clark, Boca Raton 2018, pp. 166–178.
Shepherd E., Bunn J., Flinn A., Lomas E., Sexton A., Brimble S., Chorley K., Harrison E., Lowry J., Page J., Open government data: critical information management perspectives, “Records Management Journal” 2019, vol. 29, no. 1–2, pp. 152–167, https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-08-2018-0023 [access: 15.11.2024].
Shepherd E., Engvall T., Flinn A., The role of records managers and archivists in open government [in:] Trust and records in an open digital environment, ed. H. Stančić, London, New York 2020, pp. 11– 21.
Shepherd E., Yeo G., Managing records: a handbook of principles and practice, London 2003.
Solberg R.M., “Det er mer stas å jobbe som arkivar nå enn det var før” – Endringer i arkivaryrket med innføringen av ny teknologi, unpublished thesis, NTNU, Trondheim 2014, https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/274979 [access: 15.11.2024].
Solgård L.K., Arkivarer i dag – En undersøkelse av behovet for den menneskelige faktor i offentlig arkivdanning i Norge, unpublished thesis, NTNU, Trondheim 2019, https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/2610378 [access: 15.11.2024].
Stančić H., Trust and records in an open digital environment, London, New York 2020.
Informacje: Archeion, 2024, 125, s. 160 - 201
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
Oslomet – storbyuniversitetet (Oslo Metropolitan University)
Oslomet – storbyuniversitetet (Oslo Metropolitan University)
Publikacja: 06.12.2024
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 64
Liczba pobrań: 25
