FAQ

UNESCO and the Challenge of Preserving the Digital Cultural Heritage

Data publikacji: 2020

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2020, 2/2020 (6), s. 33 - 64

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.20.010.13013

Autorzy

Sabine von Schorlemer
Technische Universität Dresden, Chair of International Law, European Union Law and International Relations and UNESCO Chair in International Relations, Bergstraße 53 01062 Dresden, Germany
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1348-3879 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Tytuły

UNESCO and the Challenge of Preserving the Digital Cultural Heritage

Abstrakt

In recent years there has been a growing awareness of the need to preserve the digital cultural heritage, a part of which is at significant risk of being lost. In light of the pressing demands to develop informed and targeted strategies, this article analyses UNESCO’s approach towards the preservation of the digital cultural heritage. Being the lead UN agency in the field of cultural heritage preservation, the organization responded to the challenge early on, notably by adopting the Charter on the Preservation of Digital Heritage. The article thus outlines UNESCO’s competencies regarding the digital cultural heritage as well as its concept thereof, before examining the organization’s strategies for the preservation of digital cultural heritage. Furthermore, by providing an outlook on some emerging trends, i.e. increasing privatization and commercialization, future requirements are identified.

Bibliografia

Council of the European Union, Council Conclusions on the Role of Europeana for Digital Access, Visibility and Use of European Cultural Heritage, 1 June 2016, 9643/16, CULT 52, AUDIO 74, DIGIT 61, TELECOM 105, PI 65.
 
de Lusenet Y., Tending the Garden or Harvesting the Fields: Digital Preservation and the UNESCO Charter on the Preservation of Digital Heritage, “Library Trends” 2007, Vol. 56(1).
 
de Lusenet Y., Drenth P.J.D., Preservation and Access: Two Concepts, One Goal. The Work of the European Commission on Preservation and Access (ECPA), “Journal of the Society of Archivists” 1999, Vol. 20(2).
 
Digital Preservation Coalition, Executive Guide on Digital Preservation, https://www.dpconline.org/our-work/dpeg-home [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
Directive 2012/28/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on certain permitted uses of orphan works, OJ L 299, 27.10.2012.
 
Directive 2013/37/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 amending Directive 2003/98/EC on the re-use of public sector information, OJ L 175, 27.06.2013.
 
Edmondson R., Recommendation Concerning the Preservation of, and Access to, Documentary Heritage Including in Digital Form. Implementation Guidelines, https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/2015_mow_recommendation_implementation_guidelines_en.pdf [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
European Commission, Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on Key Principles on the Digitisation and Making Available of Out-of-Commerce Works – Frequently Asked Questions, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_11_619 [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
European Commission Directorate-General Regional Policy, Guidelines for Successful Public-Private Partnerships, March 2003, https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/guides/ppp_en.pdf [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
European Commission on Preservation and Access, Who We Are, http://web.archive.org/web/20080403233350/http://www.knaw.nl/ecpa/about.html [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
Europeana Foundation, Europeana DSI 2-Access to Digital Resources of European Heritage, D.4.4 Report on ENUMERATE Core Survey 4, 31 August 2017.
 
Francioni F., The Preamble, in: F. Francioni (ed.), The 1972 World Heritage Convention. A Commentary, Oxford University Press, Oxford–New York 2008.
 
Graham B., Redefining Digital Art: Disrupting Borders, in: F. Cameron, S. Kenderdine (eds.), Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage: A Critical Discourse, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA–London 2007.
 
Hemsley J., Cappellini V., Stanke G. (eds.), Digital Applications for Cultural and Heritage Institutions, Ashgate, Aldershot–Burlington 2005.
 
i2010 Digital Libraries Initiative High Level Expert Group on Digital Libraries, Final Report: “Digital Libraries: Recommendations and Challenges for the Future”, December 2009, http://www.ifrro.org/sites/default/files/hlg_ppp_final_report_2009.pdf [accessed:
04.08.2020].
 
ICOM, Museums, Museum Professionals and COVID-19. Report, May 2020, https://icom.museum/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Report-Museums-and-COVID-19.pdf [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
Internet World Stats, Internet World Users by Language: Top 10 Languages, https://www.Internetworldstats.com/stats7.htm [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
Ioannides M. et al., 3D Digital Libraries and Their Contribution in the Documentation of the Past, in: M. Ioannides, N. Magnenat-Thalmann, G. Papagiannakis (eds.), Mixed Reality and Gamification for Cultural Heritage, Springer, Cham 2017.
 
Keller P. et al., Re-use of Public Sector Information in Cultural Heritage Institutions, “International Free and Open Source Software Law Review” 2014, Vol. 6(1).
 
Lauber-Rönsberg A., Raubkopierer und Content-Mafia: Die Debatte um das Urheberrecht, “Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte” 2012, Vol. 41-42.
 
Logan W.S., Closing Pandora’s Box: Human Rights Conundrums in Cultural Heritage Protection, in: H. Silverman, D.F. Ruggles (eds.), Cultural Heritage and Human Rights, Springer, New York 2007.
 
López-Menchero Bendicho V.M. et al., Digital Heritage and Virtual Archaeology: An Approach through the Framework of International Recommendations, in: M. Ioannides, N. Magnenat-Thalmann, G. Papagiannakis (eds.), Mixed Reality and Gamification for Cultural Heritage, Springer, Cham 2017.
 
Mackenzie Owen J., Preserving the Digital Heritage: Roles and Responsibilities for Heritage Repositories, in: Y. de Lusenet, V. Wintermans (eds.), Preserving the Digital Heritage. Principles and Policies, Netherlands National Commission for UNESCO, Den Haag 2007.
 
Manikowska E., Digitization: Towards a European Cultural Heritage, in: A. Jakubowski, K. Hausler, F. Fiorentini (eds.), Cultural Heritage in the European Union. A Critical Inquiry into Law and Policy, Brill Nijhoff, Leiden–Boston 2019.
 
Marcato L., Culturally Digital, Digitally Cultural: Towards a Digital Cultural Heritage?, in: S. Pinton, L. Zagato (eds.), Cultural Heritage. Scenarios 2015-2017, Edizioni Ca’ Foscari, Venezia 2017.
 
Mason R., Thinking Critically about Privatization and Public-Private Partnerships in Built Heritage Conservation, May 2013, http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/images/Mason_Hangzhou_presentation_notes.pdf [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
McCarthy G., Finding a Future for Digital Cultural Heritage Resources Using Contextual Information Frameworks, in: F. Cameron, S. Kenderdine (eds.), Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage: A Critical Discourse, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA–London 2007.
 
National Library of Australia, Guidelines for the Preservation of Digital Heritage, March 2003, CI-2003/WS/3.
 
NEMO, Survey on the Impact of the COVID-19 Situation on Museums in Europe, May 2020, https://www.ne-mo.org/fileadmin/Dateien/public/NEMO_documents/NEMO_Corona_Survey_Results_6_4_20.pdf [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
Nwabueze C.J., Copyright and Data Authenticity in the Digital Preservation of Heritage: The Case of OAPI States, “International Journal of Intangible Heritage” 2017, Vol. 12.
 
OECD, ISOC, UNESCO, The Relationship between Local Content, Internet Development and Access Prices, OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 217, 18 February 2013.
 
Palumbo G., Privatization of State-owned Cultural Heritage: A Critique of Recent Trends in Europe, in: N. Agnew, J. Bridgland (eds.), Of the Past, for the Future: Integrating Archaeology and Conservation. Proceedings of the Conservation Theme at the 5th World Archaeological Congress, Washington, D.C., 22-26 June 2003, The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles 2006.
 
Pantalony R.E., Dances with Intellectual Property. Museums, Monetization and Digitization, in: B.L. Murphy (ed.), Museums, Ethics and Cultural Heritage, Routledge, London––New York 2016.
 
RICHES, D7.3 Public-Private-Partnership Guidelines for CH, May 2016, https://resources.riches-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/RICHES-D7.3-PPP-Guidelines-for-CH_public.pdf [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
RICHES, Digital Copyright Framework. The Move from Analogue to Digital and New Forms of IPR, European Policy Brief, June 2015, https://resources.riches-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/EUROPEAN-POLICY-BRIEF_Digital-Copyright-Framework_final. pdf [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
RICHES, Public-Private Partnerships for Cultural Heritage: Opportunities, Challenges, Future Steps, Think Papers Collection No. 7, April 2016, https://resources.riches-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/rch_thinkpapers_07.pdf [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
Robertson-von Trotha C., Hauser R., UNESCO and Digitalized Heritage: New Heritage – New Challenges, in: D. Offenhäußer, W.C. Zimmerli, M.-T. Albert (eds.), World Heritage and Cultural Diversity, German Commission for UNESCO, Bonn 2010.
 
Ross S., Digital Humanities Research Needs from Cultural Heritage Looking Forward to 2025?, in: A. Benardou et al. (eds.), Cultural Heritage Infrastructures in Digital Humanities, Routledge, London–New York 2018.
 
Silberman N.A., Cultural Heritage and the Information Technologies. Facing the Grand Challenges and Structural Transformations of the 21st Century, in: F. Niccolucci (ed.), Digital Applications for Tangible Cultural Heritage. Report on the State of the Union Policies, Practices and Developments in Europe, Vol. II, Archaeolingua, Budapest 2007.
 
SUB Goettingen, Gutenberg Digital, http://www.gutenbergdigital.de/ [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
Throsby D., Cultural Capital and Sustainability Concepts in the Economics of Cultural Heritage, in: M. de la Torre (ed.), Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage. Research Report, The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles 2002.
 
Time Machine, Time Machine Manifesto. Big Data of the Past for the Future of Europe, https://www.timemachine.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Time-Machine-Manifesto.pdf [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
UNESCO, Concept of Digital Heritage, https://en.unesco.org/themes/information-preservation/digital-heritage/concept-digital-heritage [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
UNESCO, Concept of Digital Preservation, https://en.unesco.org/themes/information-preservation/digital-heritage/concept-digital-preservation [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
UNESCO, Digital Heritage, https://en.unesco.org/themes/information-preservation/digital-heritage/ [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
UNESCO, Europeana, https://en.unesco.org/creativity/policy-monitoring-platform/europeana [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
UNESCO, Explore Initiatives & Stories from UNESCO Networks, https://en.unesco.org/covid19/initiatives [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
UNESCO, Information Preservation, https://en.unesco.org/themes/information-preservation [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
UNESCO, International Programme for the Development of Communication, https://en.unesco.org/programme/ipdc [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
UNESCO, Memory of the World, https://en.unesco.org/programme/mow [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
UNESCO, Museums Around the World in the Face of COVID-19, May 2020, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373530 [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
UNESCO, Safeguarding the Documentary Heritage of Humanity, 2010, CI-2010/WS/3-CLD11910.
 
UNESCO, Statistics of Memory of the World, December 2018, https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/statistics_of_mow.pdf [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
UNESCO, Turning the Threat of COVID-19 into an Opportunity for Greater Support to Documentary Heritage, April 2020, https://en.unesco.org/covid19/communicationinformationresponse/documentaryheritage [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
UNESCO, Warsaw Declaration: ‘Culture – Memory – Identities’, Fourth International UNESCO Memory of the World Conference, 18-21 May 2011, http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/mow/warsaw_declaration_en.pdf [accessed:
04.08.2020].
 
UNESCO Executive Board, Report by the Director-General on a Draft Charter on the Preservation of the Digital Heritage, 9 April 2002, 164 EX/21.
 
UNESCO General Conference, Charter on the Preservation of Digital Heritage, 15 October 2003, 32 C/Resolution 42.
 
UNESCO General Conference, Preservation of the Digital Heritage, 3 November 2001, 31 C/ Resolution 34.
 
UNESCO General Conference, Recommendation Concerning the Preservation of, and Access to, Documentary Heritage Including in Digital Form, 17 October 2015, 38 C/Resolution 55, Annex V.
 
UNESCO General Conference, UNESCO/UBC Vancouver Declaration, 6 August 2013, 37 C/INF.15, Annex.
 
UNESCO Information for All Programme (IFAP), The Moscow Declaration on Digital Information Preservation, International Conference on Preservation of Digital Information in the Information Society: Problems and Prospects, 3-5 October 2011, http://www.
unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/ifap/Moscow%20Declaration.pdf [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
UNESCO Intergovernmental Committee for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, 10 July 2019, WHC.19/01.
 
UNESCO, PERSIST, Guidelines for the Selection of Digital Heritage for Long-term Preservation, March 2016, https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/hq/topics/cultural-heritage/documents/persist-content-guidelines-en.pdf [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
United Nations, Economic Commission for Europe, Guidebook on Promoting Good Governance in Public-Private Partnerships, ECE/CECI/4, United Nations, New York–Geneva 2008.
 
Valtolina S., A Storytelling-Driven Framework for Cultural Heritage Dissemination, “Data Science and Engineering” 2016, Vol. 1.
 
van der Werf T., van der Werf B., Documentary Heritage in the Digital Age: Born Digital, Being Digital, Dying Digital, in: R. Edmondson, L. Jordan, A.C. Prodan (eds.), The UNESCO Memory of the World Programme. Key Aspects and Recent Developments, Springer, Cham 2020.
 
Virtual Multimodal Museum, The ViMM Manifesto for Digital Cultural Heritage, https://www.vi-mm.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/ViMM-Manifesto-for-digital-culture-heritage.pdf [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
von Schorlemer S., Cultural Heritage Protection as a Security Issue in the 21st Century: Recent Developments, “Indonesian Journal of International Law” 2018, Vol. 16(1).
 
von Schorlemer S., Telecommunications, International Regulation, “Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law”, March 2009, https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e998#law-9780199231690-e998-
div1-4 [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
Wang X. et al., Digital Heritage, in: M. Ioannides, N. Magnenat-Thalmann, G. Papagiannakis (eds.), Mixed Reality and Gamification for Cultural Heritage, Springer, Cham 2017.
 
Welterbe Westwerk Corvey, Neue Technologien zur Vermittlung von Welterbe, https://welterbewestwerkcorvey.de/tagung/ [accessed: 04.08.2020].
 
Wilson I., The UNESCO Memory of the World Program: Promise Postponed, “Archivaria” 2019, Vol. 87.

Informacje

Informacje: Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2020, 2/2020 (6), s. 33 - 64

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

UNESCO and the Challenge of Preserving the Digital Cultural Heritage

Angielski:

UNESCO and the Challenge of Preserving the Digital Cultural Heritage

Autorzy

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1348-3879

Sabine von Schorlemer
Technische Universität Dresden, Chair of International Law, European Union Law and International Relations and UNESCO Chair in International Relations, Bergstraße 53 01062 Dresden, Germany
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1348-3879 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Technische Universität Dresden, Chair of International Law, European Union Law and International Relations and UNESCO Chair in International Relations, Bergstraße 53 01062 Dresden, Germany

Publikacja: 2020

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND  ikona licencji

Udział procentowy autorów:

Sabine von Schorlemer (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski