Each work undergoes internal review conducted by the journal's editorial team. Based on this, Editors make a decision to accept, recommend revisions, or reject the submitted work.
In the next stage, the work undergoes an external review procedure in double-blind review model.
The review must be in writing and conclude with a clear recommendation regarding the acceptance of the article for publication or rejection.
Upon receiving two positive reviews, authors respond to reviewers' comments and implement the recommended corrections; they provide the editorial team with an updated version of the text along with a written confirmation of the corrections being considered.
In the case of receiving one negative review, the editorial team sends the text to a third independent reviewer.
With two negative reviews, the editorial team decides not to accept the article for publication.
Authors authorize the text after editorial processing and participate in the authorial correction.
The names of reviewers for individual journal issues are not disclosed; once a year, the journal publishes a list of reviewers collaborating with the journal to the public.
