Faculty of Languages - University of Gdańsk
Cahiers ERTA, Numéro 18, 2019, pp. 25 - 43
https://doi.org/10.4467/23538953CE.19.011.10696Cahiers ERTA, Numéro 18, 2019, pp. 45 - 60
https://doi.org/10.4467/23538953CE.19.012.10697Cahiers ERTA, Numéro 18, 2019, pp. 61 - 73
https://doi.org/10.4467/23538953CE.19.013.10698Cahiers ERTA, Numéro 18, 2019, pp. 75 - 90
https://doi.org/10.4467/23538953CE.19.014.10699Cahiers ERTA, Numéro 18, 2019, pp. 91 - 103
https://doi.org/10.4467/23538953CE.19.015.10700Cahiers ERTA, Numéro 18, 2019, pp. 125 - 140
https://doi.org/10.4467/23538953CE.19.017.10702Słowa kluczowe: Mandarin paradox, arriviste, Honoré de Balzac, Félicien Champsaur, Jean‐Jacques Rousseau, Louis Aragon, dialectical image, commitment, historical novel, Beckett, Marcuse, poetry, the 70, trauma ; Grande Guerre, perte, spectralité, trauma, Great War, loss, spectrality, return, past, presence, memory, René Char, return, recreation of memories, obsession, love, past, Scriptural incest, proprietary device, intertextuality, duplication, Zola, La Conquêtede Plassans, body, gesture