Wymieranie gatunków. Reprezentacja i logika synekdochy

Jarosław Woźniak

Tytuły

Abstrakt

Extinction of Species: The Representation and Logics of Synecdoche

Extinction of Species: The Representation and Logics of Synecdoche

The aim of this paper is to analyze the phenomenon of extinction of species and its cultural representations. This will be done with reference to – among other contexts – Ursula K. Heise’s concepts of proxy logics or synecdoche (Imagining Extinction: The Cultural Meanings of Endangered Species, Chicago 2016).

The emotional and affective impact of images of violence against animals and the visualization and narrativization of the process of their dying is extremely strong. This issue has been widely described in scientific literature. Typically, an individual death represented in cultural texts evokes emphatic reactions and provokes the reader’s or viewer’s ethical reflection. Extinction proves to be much more difficult to capture:

it is a superindividual process which exceeds imagination. Therefore, in cultural texts which depict this issue, a specific narrative model is often applied. As Heise noted,

it is based on the logics of proxy or synecdoche (a part represents a whole), which functions on at least two levels, whose hierarchy can be reversed/questioned: 1) a particular species substitutes the ecosystem or biodiversity (i.e. all the species); 2) an individual life substitutes a species. The author of this article analyzes the discourse on extinction, as it functions in cultural texts, as a phenomenon which is marked by referential emptiness and signifies a failure of imagination. It is argued that despite the development of scientific and factual knowledge about the phenomenon itself no narrations or representations which apply the logics of synecdoche are capable of capturing the phenomenon of extinction of species.

Extinction of Species: The Representation and Logics of Synecdoche

The aim of this paper is to analyze the phenomenon of extinction of species and its cultural representations. This will be done with reference to – among other contexts – Ursula K. Heise’s concepts of proxy logics or synecdoche (Imagining Extinction: The Cultural Meanings of Endangered Species, Chicago 2016).

The emotional and affective impact of images of violence against animals and the visualization and narrativization of the process of their dying is extremely strong. This issue has been widely described in scientific literature. Typically, an individual death represented in cultural texts evokes emphatic reactions and provokes the reader’s or viewer’s ethical reflection. Extinction proves to be much more difficult to capture:

it is a superindividual process which exceeds imagination. Therefore, in cultural texts which depict this issue, a specific narrative model is often applied. As Heise noted,

it is based on the logics of proxy or synecdoche (a part represents a whole), which functions on at least two levels, whose hierarchy can be reversed/questioned: 1) a particular species substitutes the ecosystem or biodiversity (i.e. all the species); 2) an individual life substitutes a species. The author of this article analyzes the discourse on extinction, as it functions in cultural texts, as a phenomenon which is marked by referential emptiness and signifies a failure of imagination. It is argued that despite the development of scientific and factual knowledge about the phenomenon itself no narrations or representations which apply the logics of synecdoche are capable of capturing the phenomenon of extinction of species.

Słowa kluczowe

gatunki, wymieranie, reprezentacja, animal studies, synekdocha

species, extinction, representation, animal studies, synecdoche

Bibliografia

The Anthropology of Extinction: Essays on Culture and Species Death, ed. G.M. Sodikoff, Bloomington 2011.

Balbus S., Zagłada gatunków, „Teksty Drugie” 1999, nr 6.

Barcz A., Realizm ekologiczny. Od ekokrytyki do zookrytyki w literaturze polskiej, Katowice 2016.

Barrow M.V., The Specter of Extinction: Taking a Long View of Species Loss, ,,Environmental History” 2011, no. 3.

Borenstein E., The Plural Self: Zamjatin’s We and the Logic of Synecdoche, „The Slavic and East European Journal” 1996, no. 4.

Boyd R., Homeostasis, Species, and Higher Taxa [w:] Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, ed. R.A. Wilson, Cambridge 1999.

Boyd R., Realism, Anti-foundationalism, and the Enthusiasm for Natural Kinds, „Philosophical Studies” 1991, no. 1.

Burke K., Grammar of Motives, Berkeley 1969.

Chakrabarty D., Klimat historii. Cztery tezy, przeł. M. Szcześniak, „Teksty Drugie” 2014, nr 5.

Darwin K., O powstawaniu gatunków drogą doboru naturalnego czyli o utrzymywaniu się doskonalszych ras w walce o byt, przeł. S. Dickstein, J. Nusbaum, Warszawa 2009.

Ereshefsky M., Species [w:] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/species/ [dostęp: 13.01.2018].

Ereshefsky M., Matthen M., Taxonomy, Polymorphism, and History: An Introduction to Population Structure Theory, „Philosophy of Science” 2005, no. 1.

Fletcher A.L., Mendel’s Ark: Biotechnology and the Future of Extinction, New York 2014.

Ghiselin M.T., A Radical Solution to the Species Problem, „Systematic Zoology” 1974, no. 4.

Gish D., Klinghard D., Thomas Jefferson and the Science of Republican Government: A Political Biography of Notes on the State of Virginia, Cambridge 2017.

Gould S.J., What Is a Species?, „Discover”, December 1992.

Grabizna A., Spór o gatunek [w:] Główne problemy filozofii biologii, red. K. Chodasewicz etal., Warszawa 2017.

Heise U.K., Imagining Extinction: The Cultural Meanings of Endangered Species, Chicago 2016.

Hey J., The Mind of the Species Problem, „Trends in Ecology and Evolution” 2001, no. 16.

Hull D., A Matter of Individuality, „Philosophy of Science” 1978, no. 3.

Janik B., Urojenia jako rodzaje naturalne: problem homeostatycznych klastrów własności, „Semina Scientiarum” 2016, nr 15.

Kitcher P., Species, „Philosophy of Science” 1984, no. 2.

Kolbert E., Szóste wymieranie. Historia nienaturalna, przeł. T. Grzegorzewska,
P. Grzegorzewski, Warszawa 2016.

Lovejoy A.O., Wielki łańcuch bytu. Studium historii pewnej idei, przeł. A. Przybysławski, Gdańsk 2009.

Łuczyński E., Maćkiewicz J., Językoznawstwo ogólne. Wybrane zagadnienia, Gdańsk 1999.

MacLeod N., Extinction [w:] Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, Chichester 2005.

Mahner M.,What Is a Species?, „Journal for General Philosophy of Science” 1993, no. 1.

Małecki W., Pawłowski B., Sorokowski P., Literary Fiction Influences Attitudes Toward Animal Welfare, „PLOS One”, 22.12.2016, http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168695 [dostęp: 15.01.2018].

Pimm S.L. etal., The Biodiversity of Species and Their Rates of Extinction, Distribution, and Protection, „Science” 2014, no. 344.

Quammen D., The Song of the Dodo: Island Biogeography in an Age of Extinction, New York 1996.

Queiroz K. de, The General Lineage Concept of Species and the Defining Properties of the Species Category [w:] Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, ed. R.A. Wilson, Cambridge 1999.

Ray J., Challenging Assumptions and Definitions of Extinction and Recovery in Endangered Species Conservation, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-0Fd7gwBQE&index=6&list=PLa1neAfzhXYU_Lt8fI4j5oBU0SvDIq8V7 [dostęp: 16.09.2017].

Richards R.A., The Species Problem: A Philosophical Analysis, Cambridge 2010.

Säterberg T., Functional Extinctions of Species in Ecological Networks, Linköping 2016.

Säterberg T., Sellman S., Ebenman B., High Frequency of Functional Extinctions in Ecological Networks, „Nature” 2013, no. 499.

Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, ed. R.A. Wilson, Cambridge 1999.

Stamos D.N., The Species Problem: Biological Species, Ontology, and the Metaphysics of Biology, New York 2003.

Śmierć zwierzęcia. Współczesne zootanatologie, red. M. Kotyczka, Katowice 2014.

Uniłowski K., Jak się zmienia literatura (dzisiaj)? [w:] Zamieranie gatunku, red.
M. Ładoń, G. Olszański, Katowice 2015.

Zamieranie gatunku, red. M. Ładoń, G. Olszański, Katowice 2015.

Zimmer C., What Is a Species?, „Scientific American”, June 2008.

Ziomek J., Retoryka opisowa, Wrocław 1990.

Żylińska J., Minimal Ethics for the Anthropocene, London 2014.

Informacje

Informacje: Wielogłos, 2018, Numer 1 (35) 2018: Otwarcia: zwierzęta i ich zwierzęcości, s. 83 - 104

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2084395XWI.18.004.8818

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Polski:

Wymieranie gatunków. Reprezentacja i logika synekdochy

Angielski:

Extinction of Species: The Representation and Logics of Synecdoche

Autorzy

Jarosław Woźniak

Publikacja: 12.06.2018

Status artykułu: Otwarte

Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND

Udział procentowy autorów:

Jarosław Woźniak (Autor) - 100%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Polski

Liczba wyświetleń: 1015

Liczba pobrań: 770

<p> Wymieranie gatunków. Reprezentacja i logika synekdochy</p>

Pobierz pełny tekst

Tytuły

Abstrakt

Słowa kluczowe

Bibliografia

Informacje

Autorzy