cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTECOVID-19 Responses and the European Border Regime in Croatia and Serbia: Spectacularizing Borders and Sovereignties
Data publikacji: 29.09.2023
Studia Środkowoeuropejskie i Bałkanistyczne, 2023, Tom XXXII, s. 202 - 226
https://doi.org/10.4467/2543733XSSB.23.012.18438Autorzy
This article focuses on multiple bordering practices introduced in the context of the initial COVID -19 responses in Croatia and Serbia. These practices, often focused on the imposition of mobility control, were differently framed, executed and challenged in these two contexts and demonstrated a long-term restructuring of the European border regime at the gates of the EU . The paper outlines and contextualizes constant interplay and mutual stimulation of movement suppression and movement resilience in response to the new virus, blurring and sharpening borders, as seen from these two states at the political and geographical peripheries of Europe. Croatia and Serbia employed spectacularization and invisibilization of movement control, which steadily fostered the further compartmentalization of the population in both countries but with notable differences, especially regarding the control over unwanted migration toward the EU . In the period under discussion, borders were activated, imposed and challenged, exposing the changeability of relations between the EU border regime and the sovereign-nation states which comprise it. Different positions of Serbia and Croatia in the EU border regime also led to differences with regard to movement control, bordering, encampment and the repression exhibited toward people on the move. Old and new typologies of movement repression were tested and employed within the COVID -19 crisis framework, resulting in the further compartmentalization of societies and exclusions
Baričević V., Europske integracije i usvjanje europskih politika azilne zaštite u Hrvatskoj: prava osoba pod zaštitom i njihova integracija u društvo [European Integration and the Adoption of European Asylum Protection Policies in Croatia: the Rights of Persons under Protection and their Integration into Society], in: Prvih šezdeset godina razvoja sustava azila u Hrvatskoj (s osvrtom na sustave azila u regiji [The First Sixty Years of The Development of The Asylum System in Croatia (With Reference to the Asylum Systems in the Region)], Drago Župarić-Iljić (ed.), Zagreb 2013.
Beck U., Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London 1992.
BCHR (Belgrade Centre for Human Rights), 2020, Right to Asylum in the Republic of Serbia Periodic report for January – June 2020, http://azil.rs/en/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Periodic-Report-Right-to-Asylum-in-the-RS-January-June-2020.pdf (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
Beznec B., Speer M. and Stojić Mitrović M., Governing the Balkan Route: Macedonia, Serbia and European Border Regime, Beograd 2016.
Brambilla C., From Border as a Method of Capital to Borderscape as a Method for a Geographical Opposition to Capitalism, “Bollettino Della Società Geografica Italiana Roma”, 2015, R. 8, no 3, pp. 393–402.
Bosworth M., Inside Immigration Detention, Oxford, 2014.
Brown W., Walled States. Waning Sovereignty, New York 2010.
Brown W., Interview: A Worldwide Mutual Pact, “the drift”, 2020, R 1, no 1. https://www.thedriftmag.com/a-worldwide-mutual-pact/ (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
Bužinkić E. and Avon M., Pushback as a Technology of Crimmigration, in: Causes and Consequences of Migrant Criminalization, N. Kogovšek Šalamon (ed.), Cham 2020, pp. 157–170.
Bužinkić E. and Hameršak M., eds, Formation and Disintegration of the Balkan Refugee Corridor: Camps, Routes and Borders in Croatian Context, Zagreb and Munich 2018.
Campesi G., Immigrant Detention and the Double Logic of Securitization, in: The EU, Migration and the Politics of Administrative Detention, M. Ceccorulli & N. Labanca (eds.), London 2014, pp. 145–166.
Campesi G., Policing Mobility Regimes: Frontex and the Production of the European Borderscape, London 2021.
Collinson S., Visa Requirements, Carrier Sanctions, “Safe Third Countries” and “Readmission”: The Development of an Asylum “Buffer Zone” in Europe, “Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers”, 1996, R. 21, no 1, 76–90.
De Genova N., Spectacles of Migrant “Illegality”: The Scene of Exclusion, the Obscene of Inclusion, “Ethnic and Racial Studies”, 2013, R. 36, no 7, pp. 1180–1198.
Delmas A. and Goeury D., Bordering the World in Response to Emerging Infectious Disease: The Case of SARS-CoV-2, “Borders in Globalization Review”, 2020, R. 2, no 1, 12–20, https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03083567/document (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
EC RE (European Council for Refugees and Exiles), Information Sheet 28 May 2020: COVID-19 Measures Related to Asylum and Migration Across Europe, 2020, https://www.ecre.org/information-sheet-28-may-2020-COVID -19-measures-related-to-asylum-and-migration-across-europe/ (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
EMN (European Migration Network), Special Annex to the 30th EMN Bulletin EU Member States & Norway: Responses to COVID-19 in the Migration and Asylum Area. 2020a, https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/00_eu_30_emn_bulletin_annex_COVID _19.pdf (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
EMN (European Migration Network), Special Annex to the 31st EMN Bulletin EU Member States & Norway: Responses to COVID-19 in the Migration and Asylum Area. 2020b, https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/docs/pages/00_eu_31st_emn_bulletin_special_annex_en_0.pdf (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
Ghezelbash D. and Feith Tan N., The End of the Right to Seek Asylum? COVID-19 and the Future of Refugee Protection, “EU Working Papers 55. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Migration Policy Centre”, 2020, https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/68175 (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
Green S., A Sense of Border: The Story so Far, in: A Companion to Border Studies, T.M. Wilson and H. D onnan (eds.), C hichester 2012, pp. 573–592.
Guild E., Carrera S., Vosyliūte L., Groenendijk K., Brouwer E., Bigo D., Jeandesboz J. and Martin-Mazé M. Internal Border Controls in the Schengen Area: Is Schengen Crisis-proof?, 2016, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/571356/IPOL_STU%282016%29571356_EN.pdf (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
Hameršak M. and Stojić Mitrović M., Pandemija koronavirusne bolezni in procesi omejevanja na Hrvaškem in v Srbiji [COVID-19 Pandemic and Bordering in Croatia and Serbia]. “Glasnik Slovenskega etnološkega društva”, 2021, R. 61, no 2, pp. 39–44.
Hameršak M., Hess S., Speer M. and Stojić Mitrović M., The Forging of the Balkan Route: Contextualizing the Border Regime in the EU Periphery. “movements: Journal for Critical Migration and Border Regime Studies”, 2020, R. 5, no 1, pp. 9–29.
Hathaway O., Stevens M. and P reston L., COVID-19 and International Law: Refugee Law- The Principle of Non-Refoulement. Just Security, 2020, https://www.justsecurity.org/73593/COVID-19-and-international-law-refugee-law-the-principle-of-non-refoulement/?fbclid=IwAR2QKP7p-4Hz2dsYDaI_m4UwCcI1hr19H4PuO01NtkobTNgnxZdwual2P8I (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
Heller C., De-confine Borders: Towards a Politics of Freedom of Movement in the Time of the Pandemic, in: Centre on Migration, Policy and Society Working Paper, 2020, R. 147. https://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/2020/de-confine-borders-towards-a-politics-of-freedom-of-movement-in-thetime-of-the-pandemic-wp/ (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
Hess S. and Kasparek B., De- and Restabilising Schengen: The European Border Regime After the Summer of Migration. “Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto”, 2017, R. 56, pp. 47–77.
INFO PARK weekly report. 2020. 10–16 March 2020 #9, 8–14 April 2020 #13 and 29 April–5 May 2020 #16 (private archive).
Karamanidou L., Kasparek B. and Hess S., Border Management and Migration Control: Comparative Report, in: Respond Working Papers Global Migration Consequences and Responses, 2020, 46. https://respondmigration.com/wp-blog/border-management-migration-control-comparativereport (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
Kasparek B. and Speer M., Of Hope. Hungary and the Long Summer of Migration, 2015, http://bordermonitoring.eu/ungarn/2015/09/of-hope-en/ (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
Kasparek B., De Genova, N. and Hess S., Border Regime. “Cultural Studies (New Keywords: Migration and Borders)”, 2014, R. 29, no 1, pp. 79–81.
Lazić N., Lazić V. and Kolarić B., First Three Months of COVID-19 in Croatia, Slovenia, Serbia and Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Comparative Assessment of Disease Control Measures. “Infektološki glasnik”, 2020, R. 40, no 2, pp. 43–49.
Malkki L., Refugees and Exile: From “Refugee Studies” to the National Order of Things, “Annual Review of Anthropology”, 1995, R. 24, pp. 495–523.
Mallet-Garcia M. and Delvino N., Migrants with Irregular Status During the COVID-19 Pandemic, in: Lessons for Local Authorities in Europe Working Paper, 2020. https://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/CMISE-Impact-of-COVID-on-access-to-services-for-irregular-migrants.pdf (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
Meh E., The Health of Migrants Passing through Serbia: The Threat of the Sick ‘Other’?, “Glasnik Etnografskog instituta”, 2017, R. 65, no 3, pp. 573–591. http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-0861/2017/0350-08611703573M.pdf (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
Minca C. and Collins J., The Game. Or, “the Making of Migration” along the Balkan Route. “Political Geography”, 2021, 91, pp. 1–11, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0962629821001505?via%3Dihub (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
New Keywords Collective, Europe/Crisis: New Keywords of ‘the Crisis’ in and of ‘Europe’, “Near Futures Online: Europe at a Crossroads”, 2016, R. 1. http://nearfuturesonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/New-Keywords-Collective_11.pdf (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
Newman D., Contemporary Research Agendas in Border Studies: An Overview, in: Ashgate Research Companion to Border Studies, D. Wastl-Water (ed.), London 2011, pp. 33–47. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315612782.ch2 (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
Papadopoulos D., Stephenson N. and Tsianos V., Escape Routes: Control and Subversion in the Twenty-first Century, London 2008.
Pijnenburg A. and Rijken C., Moving beyond Refugees and Migrants: Reconceptualising the Rights of People on the Move, “Interventions”, 2021, R. 23, no 2, pp. 273–293.
Rapaić S., Mali Šengen’ kao mogućnost nove regionalne ekonomske integracije [Small Schengen as an Opportunity for a New Regional Integration]. “Međunarodni problem”, 2020, R. 72, no 3, pp. 566–594.
Reynolds J., Fortress Europe, Global Migration & the Global Pandemic, “AJIL Unbound”, 2020, R. 114, pp. 342–348, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-journal-of-international-law/article/fortress-europe-global-migration-the-global-pandemic/72D9CB9397CD295DE477F96B70DD2D22 (date accessed: 13.11.2022).
Rothenberg G.E., Austrian Sanitary Cordon and the Control of the Bubonic Plague: 1710–1871. “Journal of History of Medicine”, 1973, R. 28, no 1, pp. 15–23.
Rouse C.M., Necropolitics versus Biopolitics: Spatialization, White Privilege, and Visibility during Pandemic. “Cultural Anthropology”, 2021, R. 32, no 1, pp. 360–367.
Sekalala S. and Rawson B., Navigating the Paradoxes of Selective COVID-19 Border Closures. “Border Criminologies”, 2020, https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/centre-criminology/centreborder-criminologies/blog/2020/07/navigating (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
Stojić Mitrović M., Evropski granični režim i eksternalizacija kontrole granica EU: Srbija na balkanskoj migracijskoj ruti [The European Border Regime and the Externalization of the EU Border Control: Serbia on the Balkan Migration Route]. Beograd 2021a.
Stojić Mitrović M., Border Spectacles and COVID-19: From Invisibility to Forced Encampment of People on the Move in Serbia. “Anthropological Theory Commons”, 2021b, https://www.at-commons.com/2021/07/29/border-spectacles-and-COVID-19-from-invisibility-to-forcedencampment-of-people-on-the-move-in-serbia/ (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
Stojić Mitrović M., Ahmetašević N., Beznec B. and Kurnik A., Dark Sides of Europeanization: Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and the European Border Regime, Beograd 2020, https://rosalux.rs/rosa-publications/the-dark-side-of-europeanisation/ (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
Stojić Mitrović M. and Vilenica A., Enforcing and Disrupting Circular Movement in an EU Borderscape: Housingscaping in Serbia. “Citizenship Studies”, 2019, R. 23, no 6, pp. 540–558.
Tsianos V., Hess S. i K arakayali S., Transnational Migration. Theory and Method of an Ethnographic Analysis of Border Regimes, in: University of Sussex Working Paper, 2009, R. 55.
UN HCR Serbia Special Fortnightly Update 06–19 April 2020. https://reliefweb.int/report/serbia/unhcr-serbia-special-fortnightly-update-06-19-april-2020 (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
UN HCR Serbia Special Fortnightly Update 20 April – 3 May 2020 https://data2.unhcr.org/fr/documents/details/75989 (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
UN HCR Serbia Monthly Update March 2020. https://data2.unhcr.org/en/documents/details/75271 (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
UN HCR Serbia Monthly Update May 2020. https://data2.unhcr.org/en/documents/details/76834 (date accessed: 10.10.2022).
Walters W., Mapping Schengenland: Denaturalizing the Border. “Environmental and Planning D: Society and Space”, 2002, R. 20, no 5, pp. 561–580.
Walters W., Europe’s Borders, in: Handbook of European Studies, C. Rumford (ed.). London 2009, pp. 485–505.
Walters W., Foucault and Frontiers: Notes on the Birth of the Humanitarian Border, in: Governmentality. Current Issues and Future Challenges, U. Bröckling, S. Krassman and T. Lemke, London 2011, pp. 138–164.
Wille C. and Weber F., Analyzing Border Geographies in Times of COVID-19, 2020, https://www.melusinapress.lu/read/analyzing-border-geographies-in-times-of-covid-19/section/29d7ad90-ff96-48c6-964f-ce89416e6c6e (date accessed: 8.8.2022).
Informacje: Studia Środkowoeuropejskie i Bałkanistyczne, 2023, s. 202 - 226
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
COVID-19 Responses and the European Border Regime in Croatia and Serbia: Spectacularizing Borders and Sovereignties
University of Zagreb, Trg maršala Tita 14, HR-10000 Zagreb Croatia
Publikacja: 29.09.2023
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 568
Liczba pobrań: 226