FAQ

Santander Art and Culture Law Review

The Decision of the German Federal Court of Justice against Facebook: Opportunity to Define Digital Heritage?

Data publikacji: 2023

Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2020, 2/2020 (6), s. 251 - 260

https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.20.018.13021

Autorzy

Antoinette Maget Dominicé
Institute for Art History, LMU Munich, Zentnerstrasse 31 DE 80798 Munich, German
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9056-4544 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →
Dario Henri Haux
Faculty of Law, University of Lucerne, Frohburgstrasse 3 P.O. Box 4466 CH – 6002 Lucerne, Switzerland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1889-6231 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Abstrakt

The German Federal Court of Justice recently ruled (27.08.2020 – III ZB 30/20) that Facebook must grant parents direct access to the account of their deceased daughter. At the same time, the parents are prohibited from actively using the account. In this way, the judges established binding standards for the use of social network accounts of deceased users. Beyond inheritance and data protection law, the judgment provides an opportunity to prompt ongoing discussions about sustainable ways of safeguarding, as well as providing access to, digital content. Against the backdrop of a jurisprudence sensitized to the humanities, the two authors encourage a reflection on “spaces”, “containers”, and more generally on the significance of digital media for our everyday lives and future generations.

Bibliografia

Bartolini F., Patti F.P., Digital Inheritance and Post Mortem Data Protection: The Italian Reform, “European Review of Private Law” 2019, Vol. 27(5). BeckOGK/Blum BGB § 2311 Rn. 45-47.

Blake J., On Defining the Cultural Heritage, “The International and Comparative Law Quarterly” 2000, Vol. 49(1).

Bundesgerichtshof, 12.07.2018 – III ZR 183/17, “Neue Juristische Wochenschrift” 2018, p. 3178.

Bundesgerichtshof, 27.08.2020 – III ZB 30/20.

Cameron F., Beyond the Cult of the Replicant: Museums and Historical Digital Objects – Traditional Concerns, New Discourses, in: F. Cameron, S. Kenderdine (eds.), Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage: A Critical Discourse, MIT Press, Cambridge 2007.

Cameron F.R., Theorising Heritage Collection Digitisations in Global Computational Infrastructures, in: H. Lewi et al. (eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of New Digital Practices in Galleries, Libraries, Archives, Museums and Heritage Sites, Routledge, London–New York 2020.

Coleman D., Digital Colonialism: The 21st Century Scramble for Africa through the Extraction and Control of User Data and the Limitations of Data Protection Laws, “Michigan Journal of Race and Law” 2019, Vol. 24(2).

Colley S., Ethics and Digital Heritage, in: T. Ireland, J. Schofield (eds.), The Ethics of Cultural Heritage, Springer, New York 2015.

Edmondson R., Jordan L., Prodan A.C. (eds.), The UNESCO Memory of the World Programme: Key Aspects and Recent Developments, Springer, Cham 2019.

Etteldorf C., About Dashcams und Digital Estate – German Federal Court of Justice Weighs up Data Protection Interests, “European Data Protection Law Review” 2018, Vol. 4(3).

Galey A., The Human Presence in Digital Artefacts, in: W. McCarty, Text and Genre in Reconstruction. Effects of Digitalization on Ideas, Behaviours, Products and Institutions, Open Book Publishers, Cambridge 2010.

Grochowski M., Inheritance of the Social Media Accounts in Poland, “European Review of Private Law” 2019, Vol. 27(5).

Haux D.H., Maget Dominicé A., Raspotnig J.A., A Cultural Memory of the Digital Age?, “International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique” 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09778-7.

Henninger M., Scifleet P., How Are the New Documents of Social Networks Shaping Our Cultural Memory, “Journal of Documentation” 2016, Vol. 72(2).

Kammergericht Berlin, 03.12.2019 – 21 W 11/19, “Multimedia und Recht” 2020, p. 183.

Kwet M., Digital Colonialism: US Empire and the New Imperialism in the Global South, “Race & Class” 2019, Vol. 60(4).

Landgericht Berlin, 13.02.2019 – 20 O 172/15, “Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht – Rechtsprechungsdienst” 2019, p. 613.

Landgericht Berlin, 17.12.2015 – 20 O 172/15, “Kommunikation & Recht” 2016, p. 135.

Lefebvre H., La production de l’espace, 4th ed., Anthropos, Paris 2000.

Lixinski L., A Third Way of Thinking about Cultural Property, “Brooklyn Journal of International Law” 2019, Vol. 44(1).

de Lusenet Y., Tending the Garden or Harvesting the Fields: Digital Preservation and the UNESCO Charter on the Preservation of the Digital Heritage, “Library Trends” 2007, Vol. 56(1).

Musiani F., Schafer V., Digital Heritage and Heritagization, “RESET. Recherches en Sciences Sociales sur Internet” 2016, Vol. 6, https://doi.org/10.4000/reset.806.

Navas S., Digital Content of the Inheritance: Remarks on the Judgment of the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) of 12 July 2018 from the Standpoint of Spanish Law, “European Review of Private Law” 2019, Vol. 27(5).

Nothias T., Access Granted: Facebook’s Free Basics in Africa, “Media, Culture & Society” 2020, Vol. 42(3).

Informacje

Informacje: Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2020, s. 251 - 260

Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy

Tytuły:

Angielski:

The Decision of the German Federal Court of Justice against Facebook: Opportunity to Define Digital Heritage?

Autorzy

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9056-4544

Antoinette Maget Dominicé
Institute for Art History, LMU Munich, Zentnerstrasse 31 DE 80798 Munich, German
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9056-4544 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Institute for Art History, LMU Munich, Zentnerstrasse 31 DE 80798 Munich, German

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1889-6231

Dario Henri Haux
Faculty of Law, University of Lucerne, Frohburgstrasse 3 P.O. Box 4466 CH – 6002 Lucerne, Switzerland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1889-6231 Orcid
Wszystkie publikacje autora →

Faculty of Law, University of Lucerne, Frohburgstrasse 3 P.O. Box 4466 CH – 6002 Lucerne, Switzerland

Publikacja: 2023

Status artykułu: Otwarte __T_UNLOCK

Licencja: CC BY-NC-ND  ikona licencji

Udział procentowy autorów:

Antoinette Maget Dominicé ( Autor) - 50%
Dario Henri Haux ( Autor) - 50%

Korekty artykułu:

-

Języki publikacji:

Angielski

Liczba wyświetleń: 18

Liczba pobrań: 12