The Aboriginal Shield from the Collection of the British Museum: A Case Study from the Perspective of Recent Developments
cytuj
pobierz pliki
RIS BIB ENDNOTEWybierz format
RIS BIB ENDNOTEThe Aboriginal Shield from the Collection of the British Museum: A Case Study from the Perspective of Recent Developments
Data publikacji: 12.2022
Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2022, 2/2022 (8), s. 159 - 180
https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050XSNR.22.016.17029Autorzy
The Aboriginal Shield from the Collection of the British Museum: A Case Study from the Perspective of Recent Developments
This article analyses the case of the dispute over the return of the Aboriginal shield from the collection of the British Museum, which up to 2018 was believed to have come from the First Contact with the Aboriginal people made by the crew of captain James Cook. The arguments exchanged between the parties are studied from the perspective of the theory of hard cases. The claim for the return expressed by Rodney Kelly is supported mostly by the arguments based on justice, and both personal and cultural affiliation. The British Museum responded to the claim with results of research questioning the provenance of the shield. The relevance of the research is evaluated in the context of the symbolic significance of the case. The author believes that application of the theory of hard cases allows to broaden the debate beyond the scope of positive law.
Anghie A., Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2008.
Attenbrow V.J., Cartwright C.R., An Aboriginal Shield Collected in 1770 at Kamay Botany Bay. An Indicator of Pre-Colonial Exchange Systems in South-Eastern Australia, “Antiquity” 2014, Vol. 88(341).
Barkan E., The Guilt of Nations. Restitution and Negotiating Historical Injustices, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 2001.
Barringer T., Flynn T. (eds.), Colonialism and the Object. Empire, Material Culture and the Museum, Routledge, New York 1998.
Beaglehole J.C. (ed.), The Endeavour Journal of Sir Joseph Banks 1768-1771, vol. 2, Public Library of New South Wales, Sydney 1963.
Beckett J., Encounters with Indigeneity, Aboriginal Studies Press, Canberra 2014.
Blainey G., The Story of Australia’s People. The Rise and Fall of Ancient Australia, ePUB edition, Viking, Melbourne 2015.
British Museum Act (1963 c. 24).
British Museum, British Museum Policy. De-accession of Objects from the Collection, https://www.britishmuseum.org/sites/default/files/2019-10/De-accession_Policy_Nov2018.pdf [accessed: 13.05.2022].
British Museum, Early Shield from New South Wales, Australia, https://www.britishmuseum.org/about-us/british-museum-story/contested-objects-collection/early-shield-australia [accessed: 13.05.2022].
Buchan B., Heath M., Savagery and Civilization. From Terra Nullius to the “Tide of History”, “Ethnicities” 2006, Vol. 6(1).
Campfens E. (ed.), Fair and Just Solutions? Alternatives to Litigation in Nazi-Looted Art Disputes. Status Quo and New Developments, Eleven International, The Hague 2015.
Campfens E., Restitution of Looted Art. What About Access to Justice?, “Santander Art and Culture Law Review” 2018, Vol. 2(4).
Chechi A., The Settlement of International Cultural Heritage Disputes, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2014.
Cornu M., Renold M.-A., New Developments in the Restitution of Cultural Property. Alternative Means of Dispute Resolution, “International Journal of Cultural Property” 2010, Vol. 17(1).
Cuno J., Museums Matter. In Praise of Encyclopedic Museum, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2011.
Dworkin R., A Matter of Principle, Clarendon Press, Oxford 2001.
Feldman J.P., Restitution Is Not Enough. Deaccessioning for Justice in Contemporary Art, “Inquiries into Art, History, and the Visual” 2020, Vol. 21(1).
Flood J., The Original Australians, Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest 2006.
Foley G., Anderson T., Land Rights and Aboriginal Voices, “Australian Journal of Human Rights” 2006, Vol. 12(1).
Greenfield J., The Return of Cultural Treasures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge– New York 2007.
Herman A., Restitution. The Return of Cultural Artefacts, Lund Humphries, London 2021.
Hicks D., The Brutish Museums. The Benin Bronzes, Colonial Violence and Cultural Restitution, Pluto Press, London 2020.
Kealy-Bateman W. et al., Should We Be Royal?, “Australasian Psychiatry” 2021, Vol. 29(4).
Keenan S., The Gweagal Shield, “Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly” 2017, Vol. 68(3).
Kowalski W., Types of Claims for Recovery of Lost Cultural Property, “Museum International” 2005, Vol. 57(4).
Kryvoi Y., Matos S., Non-Retroactivity as a General Principle of Law, “Utrecht Law Review” 2021, Vol. 17(1).
Mattei U., Nader L., Plunder. When the Rule of Law Is Illegal, Blackwell, Malden–Oxford–Carlton 2008.
Nafziger J.A.R., Cultural Heritage Law. The International Regime, in: J.A.R. Nafziger, T. Scovazzi (eds.), Cultural Heritage of Mankind, Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden 2008.
Nugent M., Sculthorpe G., A Shield Loaded with History. Encounters, Objects and Exhibitions, “Australian Historical Studies” 2018, Vol. 49(1).
Oost T.I., Restitution Policies on Nazi-Looted Art in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. A Change from Legal to a Moral Paradigm?, “International Journal of Cultural Property” 2018, Vol. 25(2).
Pearson E., Old Wounds and New Endeavours. The Case for Repatriating the Gweagal Shield from the British Museum, “Art, Antiquity & Law” 2016, Vol. 21(3).
Plata A., Argumentative Aspects of Disputes over Return of Cultural Objects Lost to Colonial Powers, “Gdańskie Studia Międzynarodowe” 2020, Vol. 18(1-2).
Prott L.V., O’Keefe P.J., Law and the Cultural Heritage, vol. 3: Movement, Butterworth & Co., London 1989.
Read P., Meyers G., Reece B., What Good Condition? Reflections on an Australian Aboriginal Treaty 1986-2006, ANU Press, Canberra 2007.
Reynolds H., The Other Side of the Frontier, UNSW Press, Sydney 2006.
Sarr F., Savoy B., The Restitution of African Cultural Heritage. Toward a New Relational Ethics, November 2018, http://restitutionreport2018.com/sarr_savoy_en.pdf [accessed: 13.05.2022].
Schlunke K., One Strange Colonial Thing. Material Remembering and the Bark Shield of Botany Bay, “Continuum. Journal of Media & Cultural Studies” 2013, Vol. 27(1).
Shuart J., Is All “Pharaoh” in Love and War. The British Museum’s Title to the Rosetta Stone and the Sphinx’s Beard, “Kansas Law Review” 2004, Vol. 52(667).
Stamatoudi I., Cultural Property Law and Restitution. A Commentary to International Conventions and European Law, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2011.
Stelmach J., Kodeks argumentacyjny dla prawników [An Argumentative Code for Lawyers], “Zakamycze”, Kraków 2003.
Summary of report of the Advisory Committee on the National Policy Framework for Colonial Collections, https://www.raadvoorcultuur.nl/binaries/raadvoorcultuur/documenten/adviezen/2020/10/07/summary-of-report-advisory-committee-on-the-national-policy-framework-for-colonial-collections/Summary+of+report+Advisory+Committee+on+the+National+Policy+Framework+for+Colonial+Collections.pdf [accessed: 13.05.2022].
Taylor J., No Improper Measure, “Overland”, 15 July 2022, https://overland.org.au/2022/07/no-improper-measure/comment-page-1/ [accessed: 19.09.2022].
Thomas N., A Case of Identity. The Artefacts of the 1770 Kamay (Botany Bay) Encounter, “Australian Historical Studies” 2018, Vol. 49(1).
Thornton R., Repatriation as Healing the Wounds of the Trauma of History. Cases of Native Americans in the United States of America, in: C. Fforde, J. Hubert, P. Turnbull (eds.), The Dead and Their Possessions. Repatriation in Principle, Policy and Practice, Routledge, New York 2002.
UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, 14 November 1970, 823 UNTS 231.
UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects, 24 June 1995, 2421 UNTS 457.
van Beurden J., Treasures in Trusted Hands. Negotiating the Future of Colonial Cultural Objects, Sidestone Press, Leiden 2017.
Vrdoljak A.F., International Law, Museums and the Return of Cultural Objects, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2008.
Watson I., Aboriginal Peoples, Colonialism and International Law. Raw Law, Routledge, Abingdon–New York 2015.
Zajadło J., Po co prawnikom filozofia prawa? [Why Do Lawyers Need a Philosophy of Law?], Wolters Kluwer Polska, Warszawa 2008.
Zeidler K., Restitution of Cultural Property. Hard Case, Theory of Argumentation, Philosophy of Law, Gdańsk University Press, Gdańsk–Warsaw 2016.
Zeidler K., Plata A., The Argumentative Aspects of the Terezín Declaration and Its Place in Public International Law, in: V. Drbohlavová (ed.), Terezín Declaration – Ten Years Later. The Documentation, Identification and Restitution of the Cultural Assets of WWII Victims, Documentation Centre for Property Transfers of Cultural Assets of WWII Victims, Prague 2019.
Informacje: Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 2022, 2/2022 (8), s. 159 - 180
Typ artykułu: Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Tytuły:
The Aboriginal Shield from the Collection of the British Museum: A Case Study from the Perspective of Recent Developments
The Aboriginal Shield from the Collection of the British Museum: A Case Study from the Perspective of Recent Developments
University of Gdansk, Faculty of Law and Administration
Publikacja: 12.2022
Status artykułu: Otwarte
Licencja: CC BY
Udział procentowy autorów:
Korekty artykułu:
-Języki publikacji:
AngielskiLiczba wyświetleń: 1008
Liczba pobrań: 762